The Supreme Court of Canada continues to distinguish itself as the leading high court in the world for recognizing the need for balance in intellectual property law matters. The latest example is this morning’s pair of trademark decisions involving Mattel’s Barbie trademark and champagne maker Veuve Cliquot. In both cases, the trademark holder, arguing the fame of its brand, sought to stop small businesses from using the names in unrelated commercial activities (a Barbie restaurant and Cliquot line of clothing stores). The court ruled against the "famous" trademark holder in both cases, affirming the limits of trademark law that prevent rights holders from claiming a total monopoly for all good and services in their name given that there was limited likelihood of consumer confusion. The judgments, both written by Justice Binnie, again demonstrate that the court values both the importance of IP protection and the need for limits to such protection.
Supreme Court Rules Against Overbroad Trademark Rights
June 2, 2006
Share this post
Law Bytes
Episode 200: Colin Bennett on the EU’s Surprising Adequacy Finding on Canadian Privacy Law
byMichael Geist
April 22, 2024
Michael Geist
April 15, 2024
Michael Geist
April 8, 2024
Michael Geist
March 25, 2024
Michael Geist
March 18, 2024
Michael Geist
Search Results placeholder
Recent Posts
- The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 200: Colin Bennett on the EU’s Surprising Adequacy Finding on Canadian Privacy Law
- Debating the Online Harms Act: Insights from Two Recent Panels on Bill C-63
- The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 199: Boris Bytensky on the Criminal Code Reforms in the Online Harms Act
- AI Spending is Not an AI Strategy: Why the Government’s Artificial Intelligence Plan Avoids the Hard Governance Questions
- The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 198: Richard Moon on the Return of the Section 13 Hate Speech Provision in the Online Harms Act