The Issues Surrounding Subscriber Information in Bill C-30
February 29, 2012
Share this post
2 Comments
Law Bytes
Episode 199: Boris Bytensky on the Criminal Code Reforms in the Online Harms Act
byMichael Geist
April 15, 2024
Michael Geist
April 8, 2024
Michael Geist
March 25, 2024
Michael Geist
March 18, 2024
Michael Geist
March 11, 2024
Michael Geist
Search Results placeholder
Recent Posts
- Debating the Online Harms Act: Insights from Two Recent Panels on Bill C-63
- The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 199: Boris Bytensky on the Criminal Code Reforms in the Online Harms Act
- AI Spending is Not an AI Strategy: Why the Government’s Artificial Intelligence Plan Avoids the Hard Governance Questions
- The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 198: Richard Moon on the Return of the Section 13 Hate Speech Provision in the Online Harms Act
- Tweets Are Not Enough: Why Combatting Relentless Antisemitism in Canada Requires Real Leadership and Action
It’s good to see some mention of the fact multiple people/machines share an IP address. In fact I’d imagine the majority of connections in Canada do. It’s something this bill seems to entirely overlook and makes no mention of.
Considering the large number of unsecured routers that are merely purchased and plugged in I think this bill requires some sort of protection. We’ve all seen what allegations of anything related to child porngraphy can do to a person and their reputation.
http://www.buylebronjames9shoes.com/
555linli8
The tyrant dies and his rule ends, the martyr dies and his rule begins.