WORLD MARKETS LOSE 3%? by marc falardeau (CC BY 2.0) https://flic.kr/p/8erVqK

WORLD MARKETS LOSE 3%? by marc falardeau (CC BY 2.0) https://flic.kr/p/8erVqK

News

No Panic: Canadian TV and Film Production Posts Biggest Year Ever Raising Doubts About the Need for Site Blocking and Netflix Regulation

This year in digital and broadcast policy is likely to be dominated by two lobbying efforts: the radical website blocking plan proposed by the Bell coalition and the ongoing efforts from Canadian culture groups to impose new regulations on online video services such as Netflix. At the heart of both lobbying efforts are similar claims that seek to paint the Canadian cultural sector at risk of collapse without new regulations in the form of blocking or mandated contributions. Last week, the Canadian Media Production Association released Profile 2017, its annual report on the state of the industry. The latest report tells a remarkable success story. Far from the doom and gloom, the Canadian industry is achieving record growth, suggesting that website blocking and new Internet regulations are ill-advised solutions in search a problem.

The total value of the sector exceeded $8 billion, over than a billion more than has been recorded over the past decade. In fact, last year everything increased: Canadian television, Canadian feature film, foreign location and service production, and broadcaster in-house production. Canadian television, which some claim is at risk due to services such as Netflix, posted the largest expenditure ever (or least over the past two decades looking back at older annual reports).

 

CMPA, Profile 2017, p. 17 http://www.primetimeinottawa.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/PROFILE2017.pdf

 

The data in the report undermines claims from the Bell website blocking coalition that piracy lies at the heart of declining television subscriber revenues. For example, the Bell coalition application attributes cord cutting to piracy, guessing that “if even one third of the lost or never obtained subscriptions are in part attributable to piracy, the lost revenues for BDUs would be between $220 million and $350 million annually.”

But the industry data explains where the money is actually going: online video services, which have seen increased revenues of more than $1 billion per year over the last four years. In fact, two Canadian online video services – CraveTV and Club illico – are estimated to have earned $373 million last year, up from just $13 million four years earlier. In other words, these are not “lost revenues”, but rather shifting revenues from traditional television packages to paid Internet streaming services.

 

CMPA, Profile 2017, p. 23 http://www.primetimeinottawa.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/PROFILE2017.pdf

 

Further, movie theatre companies such as Cineplex have also joined the website blocking coalition, but their revenues have also increased in recent years. The Bell coalition claims that millions may be lost at the box office, but the data shows box office revenues increasing in Canada by 2.2% last year to a three-year high. The data also indicates that Canadian films consist of very a small part of overall revenues. English language films generated a total of $7.4 million for the entire year at the Canadian box office. With 113 English-language films playing in theatres, the average revenue for an English language film was just $65,000. Their issue is clearly not piracy, but rather a larger challenge of competing against U.S. and other foreign films for attention.

Both the Bell website blocking coalition and those arguing for Netflix regulation are united in the view that the Canadian television production sector is at risk, either due to piracy or the presence of foreign streaming services that do not face “Netflix taxes.” For example, the Bell coalition website blocking proposal highlights the economic impact of the production sector and argues “left unchecked, piracy will dramatically erode the contribution of these companies and their employees to Canada’s digital and creative economies.” Those comments were echoed in a Globe and Mail article today in which Bell executive Randy Lennox argued that production is at risk without site blocking. Proponents of Netflix taxes or regulation claim that the emergence of unregulated streaming services such as Netflix will mean less money to support to Canadian productions.

However, the experience to date is the completely the opposite with new streaming services investing in the sector and helping to propel it to greater heights. The increase in foreign investment in production in Canada is staggering. When Netflix began investing in original content in 2013, the total foreign investment (including foreign location and service production, Canadian theatrical, and Canadian television) was $2.2 billion. That number has doubled in the last five years, now standing at nearly $4.7 billion. While much of that stems from foreign location and service production that supports thousands of jobs, foreign investment in Canadian television production has also almost doubled in the last five years. The data makes it clear that Netflix isn’t a threat, it’s an opportunity with new money entering the sector.

 

CMPA, Profile 2017, p. 28 http://www.primetimeinottawa.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/PROFILE2017.pdf

 

Indeed, Canadian content production hit an all-time high last year at $3.3 billion, rising by 16.1%. Notably, the increased expenditures do not come from broadcasters, whose relevance continues to diminish year-by-year. In fact, the private broadcasters (led by Bell) now contribute only 11% of the total financing for English-language television production. Their contribution is nearly half of what it was just three years ago (now standing at $236 million) in an industry that is growing. Yet despite the private broadcaster decline, money is pouring into the sector from distributors (who see benefits of global markets) and foreign financing (which has grown by almost $200 million in the past four years) leading the way. The sector remains heavily supported by the public, with federal and provincial tax credits now accounting for almost 30% of financing.

 

CMPA, Profile 2017, p. 55 http://www.primetimeinottawa.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/PROFILE2017.pdf

 

The increasing irrelevance of private broadcasters for financing Canadian television production is particularly pronounced in the fiction genre (ie. drama and comedy shows). This is easily the most important genre from an economic perspective, with $1.29 billion spent last year. Private broadcasters only contributed $59 million or five percent of the total. By comparison, foreign financing was $285 million. Those numbers should be considered with Netflix critics claim that an additional $100 million per year means very little.

 

CMPA, Profile 2017, p. 57 http://www.primetimeinottawa.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/PROFILE2017.pdf

 

The Canadian industry data should be cause for celebration within the industry. The success story confirms that Canadian television and film production is far less dependent on regulation than is often portrayed with a sector that can compete on the global stage. Moreover, the data also undermines far-fetched claims from the Bell coalition that the industry is in crisis and that drastic measures such as website blocking are needed to save it. Billions of dollars are entering the marketplace with Canadian production at an all-time high, meaning politicians and regulators should avoid hitting the panic button and resist harmful policy proposals that are inconsistent with actual industry data.

21 Comments

  1. So it all boils down to revenue is up, so piracy is OK.

    There are smaller players involved than those mentioned in these profit figures.

    • And yet it is bigger players who are the ones complaining.

      • The smaller players rely on the clout of the larger ones to hire lawyers and mount lobbying campaigns to try to do the impossible: enforce the law and get people to stop stealing from them. A generation ago this would not only have been impossible technologically but unthinkable morally.

        I love how all the responses to my comments avoid the main point: why pirate? Is it right? Do you pay for your computer? Your shoes? Your restaurant tabs? You pirate because the technology allows you to much easier than walking out of a restaurant after eating a meal without paying, the owner of which may be rich beyond your dreams. That doesn’t mean it’s right.

        • Once again, you miss the point in all of this. For one, these statistics prove that Canadians are legitimately paying for content. The shift is simply moving from one legitimate source (traditional cable TV to online subscriptions).

          Furthermore, the whole premise of demanding online censorship is that Canadians are somehow all racing from legitimate sources to unauthorized sources is a completely false as shown in this post.

          The industry is trying to scapegoat piracy and reality is putting the breaks on that.

          • You should try reading a few other sources other than those that just confirm your own misinformation. Try Barry Sookman’s blog.

            And no, law enforcement is not censorship. Censoring what? The illegal procurement of cultural products that can be procured legally elsewhere? Don’t make me laugh. You don’t know what censorship is.

  2. Was looking around for actual statistics myself. Looks like you had the same idea as I did and found them first. Nice one.

  3. David Brideau says:

    With regulations in place, they could make more money. They see this missing money as a loss of potential revenue – or that’s how I think they’re spinning it.

  4. Pingback: Banner Year: Canadian Film and TV Posts New Growth Records

  5. James Blkiwas says:

    Let’s call things what they are: Bell and its coalition partners are lying to the CRTC about the state of the industry. Yet they continue to be treated seriously by regulators and are given a hearing on their trumped-up (no pun intended) allegations that have no basis in fact.

    This has been Bell’s standard operating procedure since the days when Sprint wanted to offer an alternative long-distance service to Canadian consumers. Hasn’t anyone in Ottawa figured out what Bell is up to?

    It has been nearly two decades since I purchased anything from Bell, and this is a reason why.

    • Trumped up allegations? That piracy exists? Listen, I hate big telecoms and all the rest. But there’s more than that at issue here. With movies for example there are pirate sites like Karagarga that specialize in small indie productions that are being wiped out by piracy. These sites could be reviewed by an independent tribunal. There’s no way they would withstand the scrutiny. They’re torrent sites. You think torrents are freedom of expression? A complete red herring. That’s like saying you have freedom of assembly, so you want to have a party in your bank’s vault. What are you expressing on a torrent site, other than the fact that you’re quite happy to steal someone else’s livelihood?

      • Your comment: “indie productions that are being wiped out by piracy”

        Reality: “In Canada, box-office sales for independent film grew compared to the previous year, with total sales reaching $254 million”

        https://telefilm.ca/wp-content/uploads/telefilm-ar-final2015-2016.pdf

      • What do torrent sites and first run movies have to do with cable TV. Show me any stats that say Canadians are using torrents and/or Kodi to watch mostly independent Canadian movies. That is hardly the argument that lead Bell to launch this coalition.

        The reality is that Bell and the rest of the Canadian providers make most of their revenue off of American content and people are finding other ways to watch that content.

        • I said, I hate telecoms too. But they have the money and the clout to hire lawyers and lobbyists to protect their profits in ways which benefit Canadian creators who don’t have that money or clout.

          Mr. Wilson, find some statistics for the amount of money being lost by independents to piracy, not just how much they are making. If your boss cut your salary and said well, you’re still making money aren’t you, that would be OK, right? Right. Are people losing money to piracy or not? Is piracy fair or not? If piracy is not a problem and no Canadians are using torrent sites, why complain about a plan to shut them down here?

  6. Pingback: Trudeau Puts An End to the Netflix and ISP Tax Debate: "Consumers...Pay Enough for Their Internet" - Michael Geist

  7. Looks like they took the report down 🙁 – getting a 404 not found.

  8. Pingback: Sending a Different Message: After Bell Website Blocking Coalition Warns About Cord Cutting, Bell CEO Says It Isn't Accelerating - Michael Geist

  9. thank you admin shear his content

  10. Pingback: The Case Against the Bell Coalition's Website Blocking Plan, Part 1: Canada's Current Copyright Law Provides Effective Anti-Piracy Tools - Michael Geist

  11. Pingback: EFF: Will Canada Be the New Testing Ground for SOPA-lite? Canadian Media Companies Hope So | tgh318

  12. Pingback: Will Canada Be the New Testing Ground for SOPA-lite? Canadian Media Companies Hope So | NETWORKFIGHTS.COM

  13. Pingback: EFF: Will Canada Be the New Testing Ground for SOPA-lite? Canadian Media Companies Hope So | worduser01

Leave a Reply to George Cancel

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

*