As debate over the AUCC - Access Copyright settlement spreads to
campuses across the country, one of the talking points that has emerged
is that the coverage of linking to content in the settlement provides
some value to the education community. The model licence defines copy
as:
any reproduction, in any material
form whatever, including a Digital Copy, that is made by or as a
consequence of any of the following activities
(k) posting a link or hyperlink to a
Digital Copy.
Critics argue that this provision gives the AUCC no value as there is
simply no need to license such activities. The inclusion of the
provision means students will be paying something - there must some
notional part of the $26 annual fee that covers this section - for
nothing. Supporters of the deal, including AUCC, claim otherwise.
Indeed, the AUCC
FAQ has two questions and answers on point:
Slashdot, Digg, Del.icio.us, Newsfeeder, Reddit, StumbleUpon, TwitterTagsShareFriday May 04, 2012 |
|
View
|