The recent federal budget was a hefty 498 pages, but my weekly
technology law column (Ottawa
Citizen version, homepage
version) notes it still omitted
disclosing the decision to eliminate funding for the Community
Access
Program, Canada's longstanding initiative to provide an Internet
access
alternative for those without connectivity. The world has changed
dramatically since the CAP was first launched in 1995, but the decision
to cut it without establishing alternative solutions for low-income
Canadians who are not online is a disappointing development that
highlights yet again the absence of a national digital strategy from
Industry Minister Christian Paradis.
The CAP was once a foundational element in the federal government's
effort to connect Canadians. In the late 1990s, many did not have
Internet access at home and wireless data plans were still years away.
Today, the majority of Canadians have residential broadband access as
well as wireless connectivity through their smartphones or other
devices.
The decision to cut the CAP therefore does not come as a surprise.
Slashdot, Digg, Del.icio.us, Newsfeeder, Reddit, StumbleUpon, TwitterTagsShareWednesday April 18, 2012 |
|
View
|
|
|
The CRTC has written to
participants
from the last "fact finding exercise" on over-the-top video services to
advise that it believes that no further studies are needed as this
time. The Commission notes that "over-the-top programming services have
not had an impact sufficient to warrant another fact-finding exercise
at this time." I wrote about the CRTC
exercise last year along with posts on the submissions it received (1, 2).
Slashdot, Digg, Del.icio.us, Newsfeeder, Reddit, StumbleUpon, TwitterTagsShareWednesday April 18, 2012 |
|
|
The Economist has an editorial
endorsing mandated open access for publicly funded research. It
concludes that "government bodies that fund academic research should
require that the results be made available free to the public. So
should charities that fund research. This would both broaden access to
research and strengthen the hand of 'open access' journals, since many
researchers would then be unable to publish results in closed ones."
Slashdot, Digg, Del.icio.us, Newsfeeder, Reddit, StumbleUpon, TwitterTagsShareWednesday April 18, 2012 |
|
|
I posted my initial
reaction to the AUCC - Access Copyright deal yesterday. Other
comments come from CAUT,
Ariel Katz, Sam
Trosow, Michael
Ridley, and Meera Nair.
Slashdot, Digg, Del.icio.us, Newsfeeder, Reddit, StumbleUpon, TwitterTagsShareWednesday April 18, 2012 |
|
|