|
Earlier today I walked a few blocks from my office to Ottawa's Rideau
Centre to attend a press conference with Industry Minister Tony Clement
and Canadian Heritage Minister James Moore, who promised an important
announcement.
The two ministers stood in front of an HMV and a group of students
wearing t-shirts with No iPod tax logos on the back to declare that
they were firmly set against a massive new tax on technology for all
the holiday shoppers in the mall. The Ministers claimed that all
three
opposition parties supported a tax of up to $75, which (reminiscent of
the Dion "tax on everything" campaign) would apply to all technology
devices and even cars.
The press conference suggests that opposition to extending the private
copying levy may be the key positioning point for the government in
support of Bill C-32. Rather than focusing on the bill's actual
provisions, the government will argue that the bill deserves support
from the public because of what isn't there - the levy extension.
However, an alternate press conference might have featured the
following script (the actual
script is here):
Slashdot, Digg, Del.icio.us, Newsfeeder, Reddit, StumbleUpon, TwitterTagsShareTuesday December 14, 2010 |
|
View
|
|
The Australian Government's Productivity Commission, which is the
government's independent research and advisory body on a range of
economic, social and environmental issues affecting the welfare of
Australians, has released a new
report
on the impact of bilateral and regional trade agreements. The
report,
which contains some key lessons for Canada given our current trade
negotiations activities with Europe, India, and South American
countries, warns against the inclusion of intellectual property within
these trade agreements. The report concludes:
The Commission considers that
Australia should not generally seek to include IP provisions in further
BRTAs, and that any IP provisions that are proposed for a particular
agreement should only be included after an economic assessment of the
impacts, including on consumers, in Australia and partner countries. To
safeguard against the prospect that acceptance of ‘negative sum game’
proposals, the assessment would need to find that implementing the
provisions would likely generate overall net benefits for members of
the agreement.
Slashdot, Digg, Del.icio.us, Newsfeeder, Reddit, StumbleUpon, TwitterTagsShareTuesday December 14, 2010 |
|
View
|
|
Rogers has been hit with a complaint about its throttling practices but
has been very slow amend its public disclosure documents as required by
the CRTC. Complaints began appearing online
earlier this fall, with users noting that Rogers was degrading P2P
uploads and downloads. Torrent Freak details
what happened next - a complaint to the CRTC, an attempt to downplay
the issue, and finally an acknowledgement that the traffic management
requires a change in publicly disclosed policy.
Slashdot, Digg, Del.icio.us, Newsfeeder, Reddit, StumbleUpon, TwitterTagsShareTuesday December 14, 2010 |
|
|
The CRTC has issued a call for
comments
on the regulations associated with the digital television transition.
The regulations include required public service announcements and
information posted on broadcaster websites. The transition is
currently set for August 31, 2011. The deadline for comments is
January 11, 2011.
Slashdot, Digg, Del.icio.us, Newsfeeder, Reddit, StumbleUpon, TwitterTagsShareTuesday December 14, 2010 |
|
|