30 Days of DRM: 30 Things You Can Do |
| Print | |
|
Monday September 18, 2006
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Update (December 3, 2007) - I have posted a newly updated version of what you can do in light of the forthcoming Canadian DMCA. The posting includes a YouTube video, a Facebook group, and updated contact information. Update (November 29/07): With a Canadian DMCA seemingly imminent, the importance of speaking out has never been more important. Some details on the likely new bill can be found here. I've updated the 30 Things You Can Do to reflect the new Ministers. The House of Commons is back in session and, as I promised last month, the 30 Days of DRM project has now concluded. The postings remain accessible via the 30 Days of DRM page, the wiki, and a new PDF version that incorporates all postings into a single document.
Comments (22)
![]()
Lindsey
said:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Need more info Could you possibly link to the text of the bill, with maybe excerpts of the sections that you object to? I don't feel comfortable writing to my MP without doing the research |
|
... What bill are you talking about? If you mean the next copyright bill, we will see it once the entertainment industry is finished writing it. |
|
... Charming, the idea that a paltry fraction of the population will wield some kind of power. Might makes right -- The big corp's have all the gold so they make all the rules. You need a massive mobilization of the population to have any effect. Three ways that can motivate the mainstream population: 1. Exposing a scandal (Most feasible) 2. Organized media campaign (Impossible without lots of $$) 3. Exposing American influence (Also feasible) 1. can be be achieved by pointing out the bribes that Oda has taken from the entertainment industry and the resulting conflict of interest. Even better would be to prove that the bill was written, in whole or in part, by the entertainment industry. This should be particularly shameful for the Conservative government which ran as an 'accountable' government. 3. can be achieved by pointing out that the 'Canadian' entertainment industry does not represent Canadians at all and are simply the Canadian arm of the *American* entertainment industry whose goal is to introduce legislation favourable to American industry. This is also embarrassing for the Conservative government, as they are commonly accused as being American lapdogs. |
|
Need more info too Saw the link on Boing-Boing, but I'm rather uneducated on this bill. There's a lot of information on your site, but where do I start? Do you have a link that disects the bill and what is so bad about it? I'm not a fan of DRM, nor do I want to see RIAA or MPAA type lawsuits in Canada, but I need points to argue in my letter. Thanks. |
|
Keeping Checking More Than Just A Bill Past experience on this issue suggests that it is just as important, and perhaps more so, to keep tabs on committee minutes and evidence. Much of the real work of Parliament actually happens in committee, and the Bill that arrives in Parliament is often barely rubber-stamped by the Commons. It's still all done by your elected representatives -- but committee hearings tend to be out of site and out of mind. Be prepared for a LOT of work to keep up on this issue. Often it seems that by the time a Bill is presented - and sometimes even before committee meetings start - there is a lot of groundwork, reading, and planning has gone on. Challenging the government's planning only when a Bill is presented is akin to complaining about the destination when you are almost there. You may also find that you get referred to your MP's legislative assistant. That's ok - that person may be more aware of legislation working its way up than your MP, who in many cases has a ton of public appearances to keep up. First thing - figure out who is on what committee. I have found that members sitting on committees are, in many cases, both more knowledgeable and more interested in a substantive discussion on an issue than even your own MP. Don't hesitate to cross party lines when communicating with committee members - if an issue is going to be a big one, all members of a committee are interested in hearing about it. |
|
Committee checking... As an example, check out the following exchange in the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage. Note that this level of detail is in the Evidence, not in the Minutes.. [ link ] *That's* the level where a lot of stuff happens. |
|
help with legalese Ditto on needing help finding this info with my own eyes. I read the actual Bill as best as I could but couldn't actually find the parts about making your own copies of media etc. I'm just not an expert at legal jargon. I'll write my MP ( i often do,) but I definitely need too see, read and interpret these changes myself. Can anyone point out where this info is? Thanks! |
|
... As long as the email TO YOUR OWN MP clearly contains a mailing address that is identifiable as being in that Member's riding, it counts just as much as a dead-tree letter. |
|
... Do you have any sample letters? I've sort of just glazed past this hubla when it was happening in the states since I couldn't contribute. Now, I'd like to contribute but I know I'll just get bogged down to write a letter. I care but I'm real lazy/busy to write a letter. I'm not too sure about the contents of the bill either and for the same reasons above, I probably won't read the text of the bill, let alone understand it. Any ideas for a lazy/busy university student who'd like to help out? |
|
Effective communication WJM is right. I have worked in a constituency office. An email can be just as effective as a letter, as long as you give your address and write to your own MP/MPP. Make it your own words, not a form letter. This is a federal matter. The suggestions of sending to your Provincial member and the school boards etc is nonsense. DON'T WRITE TO EVERYONE UNDER THE SUN. Target your message. Make sure you are sending it to the right person for your riding. |
|
Another Sample Letter The more time you put into communicating with your MP, the more effective it will be. I have met with my own MP many times, and he is very up-to-date on these issues. If people want to discuss this with a group of people that includes those who are quite engaged with their MPs they might wish to join the Digital Copyright Canada forum. [ link ] If you don't have the time, we do have another sample letter on the Digital Copyright Canada site which you can send. [ link ] If you log into the system and tell it what electoral district it is in, you can send an email directly from our site to your MP. If you don't want to log in you can cut-and-past the sample message into your own email program. |
|
my letter People can use the text/message in my letter. They can find it at [ link ] And in html if that's allowed on this blog. Note that I didn't get a response from my MP or any others CCed. I may not have included my address, but certainly included my phone number. Include your address so they can confirm what constituency you are in. |
|
good ideas Dave, "This is a federal matter. The suggestions of sending to your Provincial member and the school boards etc is nonsense." It's not nonsense. You need to find allies whereever you can, and getting other members of your community interested in petitioning the federal government is an important tactic. There's only so much one letter can do, and you need to enlist others in the cause to win against the RIAA/CRIA. |
|
... I'm an American, and I'd like to tell you that the American people hate this as much as you do. We are finally beginning to make some legal progress against the RIAA down here. It can be done. Please, fight this. Fight with every tactic you can muster. We need to stand together against these people. Thank you. |
|
... I am an American in the final stages of a PhD in Business. I have been investigating emigrating to Canada at the end of my program. This could be a deal-killer for me. My skills are in high demand worldwide, and this would put Canada at a disadvantage. Granted, I am only one individual, and Canada probably will get along just fine with one less American, but still... It would be a real shame. Please, O! Canada, do the right thing and make this evil, evil thing go away. |
|
Dead White Guy An anonymous writer above said, "3. Exposing American influence (Also feasible)" Maybe I can help. I am another American who really hopes that you guys stop this thing. "3. can be achieved by pointing out that the 'Canadian' entertainment industry does not represent Canadians at all and are simply the Canadian arm of the *American* entertainment industry whose goal is to introduce legislation favourable to American industry. This is also embarrassing for the Conservative government, as they are commonly accused as being American lapdogs." OK. So, here goes. Apologies if I offend anyone. OK, you silly Canadians. We have you now! Um, bwa-ha-ha. And, like, we're gonna make you adopt our laws to protect our companies, and we're gonna hold Denny Crane, Pamela Anderson, Bob & Doug McKenzie, and Capt. Kirk hostage, till you do our bidding. So, listen up! We're America, and we own the world! Um, bwa-ha-ha. And, like, we can do anything we want, and you'd better pass lots of laws that protect American interests. You can quote me. I hope that helps. |
|
US readers of this BLOG US readers of this article should note that it is not the IFPI/RIAA/CRIA that is the problem, but the USPTO, USTR and US Ambassador. Please write your federal representatives to convince them to direct these US government representatives from pushing laws on Canada which are already highly controversial within the USA, and already causing serious dammage to the US economy (IE: outsourcing manufacturing and real jobs to other countries in return for pledges to increase patent/copyright protectionism that can never replace what was given away). |
|
The Committee this is going to The Cabinet COmmittee this bill is being discussed in is the Economic Growth and LOng-Term Prosperity Committee, chaired by his lordship turncoat David Emerson. Find the Committee membership here (scroll down). [ link ] |
|
Muse Does this mean the price of blank media is going down? Because my understanding was that a portion of the price of blank tapes, CD-ROMs, DVDs, etc. goes directly to the recording industry (and ostensibly, to the artists) to compensate them for consumer copying. |
|
... "Does this mean the price of blank media is going down? Because my understanding was that a portion of the price of blank tapes, CD-ROMs, DVDs, etc. goes directly to the recording industry (and ostensibly, to the artists) to compensate them for consumer copying." There is no indication that any such change is planned. It's called having your cake and eating it too. |
|
respond this post Make your own life easier take the loans and all you require. |
We want to enhance competition and investment in this country, and this is why we adopted this policy back in 2008 for the AWS spectrum. Let me say that the price went down by an average of 11% since then, and we will continue this way with the 700 megahertz spectrum. We launched consultation with the industry to make sure that we enhance competition and provide better choice and better rates for our consumers.