The ACTA Internet Chapter: Putting Pieces Together
ACTA Guide, Part 1: The Talks To-Date
ACTA Guide, Part 2: The Documents (Official and Leaked)
ACTA Guide, Part 3: Transparency and ACTA Secrecy
Industry Minister Should Put Spam Law Back on the Agenda |
| Print | |
|
Monday September 25, 2006
|
|||
|
Appeared in the Toronto Star on September 25, 2006 as As Spam Flow Grows, Harper Government Sleeps [http://geistcanadaspamagenda.notlong.com] Earlier this month Industry Minister Maxime Bernier traveled to Saskatoon to deliver the keynote address at the Canadian Chamber of Commerce’s Annual Meeting. Bernier's speech focused on the value of entrepreneurialism and emphasized the federal government's plans to establish a business environment that facilitates the development of new Canadian companies. Should the Minister take the time to carefully read the report, he will find that a broad cross-section of Canadians representing Internet service providers, marketers, and the public, do not share his doubts about the role of government. The briefing warned that spam now dominates email, with some reports suggesting that up to 80 percent of all email entering businesses is spam. Moreover, it noted that the increase in spam "causes e-mail systems to experience unexpected overloads in bandwidth, server storage capacity and loss of end-user productivity" and that "spam has become more dangerous, and a primary vehicle for network threats such as viruses, spyware, and phishing." The briefing concluded that these threats were leading to an erosion of trust and confidence, discouraging consumer e-commerce, changing online behaviour, and resulting in diminishing faith in online banking. To address the concerns, department officials pointed to the Task Force’s recommendation of anti-spam legislation that would cover unsolicited commercial email, false and misleading email header data, counterfeit addressing, and the unauthorized collection of email addresses. Comments (1)
![]()
John Doak
said:
|
|||
|
V.P Operations, Machineco Michael Geist has produced as excellent commentary on the need for a focussed response to spam by our federal government. This is not a partisan issue. All levels of government,business and the private sector, today obligatorily on the internet, suffer. Surely the incidence of spam by now, an utter pestilence on the IT skyline, has passed any rational level of tolerence by those who can make a difference- the 'government'. Spam can even be viewed as a human rights issue, the rights and freedoms of individuals (and businesse) to NOT have the majority of their communications so invaded. I would back all GOVERNMENT intervention, even introducing (e.g.) a compulsory 1 charge for each email message, no matter to or from whom- and under ALL circumstances. ISP's would have their spam costs reduced to a trickle and the rest of us could reclaim our Inboxes and rejoice! John Doak machineco.com canallachine.com LaurentianLiving.com carcontract.com |