The ACTA Internet Chapter: Putting Pieces Together
ACTA Guide, Part 1: The Talks To-Date
ACTA Guide, Part 2: The Documents (Official and Leaked)
ACTA Guide, Part 3: Transparency and ACTA Secrecy
We're All On Candid Camera |
| Print | |
|
Monday November 27, 2006
|
|||
|
Appeared in the Toronto Star on November 27, 2006 as We're All On Candid Camera Appeared in the BBC on November 28, 2006 as Private Life Exposed by Net Video Before there was YouTube, the Internet video phenomenon that is currently streaming more than 100 million videos each day, there was George Holliday. Holliday was a mere by-stander on a Los Angeles street in 1992 when he captured amateur video of police officers beating Rodney King. The incident, which sparked riots and national outrage about police brutality, would likely never have come to light without the existence of the Holliday video.
While there are some obvious benefits that arise from the transparency and potential accountability that can come from video evidence of controversial events, the emergence of an always-on video society raises some difficult questions about the appropriate privacy-transparency balance, the ethics of posting private moments to a global audience, and the responsibility of websites that facilitate Internet video distribution. Those questioned crystallized this month at an Ottawa-area school, after two 13-year old students posted classroom video taken with a cellphone of their teacher yelling at a fellow student on YouTube. News reports indicate that the video may have been staged, with students inducing the teacher into the shouting match specifically so that it could be captured on video. Although the video has since been removed from YouTube, the teacher is currently on stress leave, the two students have been suspended, and the school has banned personal electronic devices from the classroom. As technology continues to evolve, it is unlikely that such measures will prove successful. With built-in video cameras on laptop computers, hundreds of tiny video-capable devices, an incredibly array of video-ready cellphones, and widespread Internet access, the clip culture is rapidly morphing from bits of favourite television shows to videos of our friends, neighbours, and even ourselves. Rather than banning the technology, we must instead begin to grapple with the implications of these changes by considering the boundaries between transparency and privacy. As our expectations of the availability of video changes, so too must our sense of the video rules of the road. Michael Geist holds the Canada Research Chair in Internet and E-commerce Law at the University of Ottawa, Faculty of Law. He can reached at mgeist@uottawa.ca or online at www.michaelgeist.ca. Comments (1)
![]()
anonmynous
said:
|
|||
|
- FYI: In Switzerland, there was a case of rape of a 13-years-old girl, commited by several teenagers from 15-18, which they recorded with their cellphone, intending to put it on a youtube-like site later. |