Text: Small Text  Normal Text  Large Text  Larger Text

    Blog Archive

    PrevPrevMay 2012NextNext
    SMTWTFS
      12345
    6789101112
    13141516171819
    20212223242526
    2728293031

    61 Reforms to C-61 - Wrap-Up Post

    PDF  | Print |  E-mail
    Wednesday September 17, 2008

    With the 61 reforms to C-61 series now concluded, this post provides more accessible access to the many posts.  A PDF version of all 61 posts can be downloaded here.  A list of all the posts, grouped by subject matter, can be found below.

    Consultation
    Day 1: Remedy the Lack of Consultation
     
    Format Shifting:
    Day 2: Format Shifting Limited to Videocassettes
    Day 3: Format Shifting Subject to Digital Lock Provision
    Day 4: Format Shifting's 12 Step Approval Process
     
    Time Shifting:
    Day 5: Time Shifting Provision Subject to the Broadcast Flag
    Day 6: Time Shifting Provision Excludes Internet-Only Recording
    Day 7: Time Shifting Provision Prohibits Network-Based PVRs
    Day 8: Time Shifting Provision's Time and Copy Limits
     
    Music Shifting
    Day 9: Music Shifting Subject To Anti-Circumvention Limitation
    Day 10: Music Shifting Provision May Conflict With Computer Backup Systems
    Day 11: Music Shifting Provision Non-Compatible With Online Music Lockers
    Day 12: Music Shifting Provision and Private Copying
    Day 13: Music Shifting Provision and One Copy Per Device
    Day 14: Music Shifting Provision Says Contract Trumps Contract
     
    TPMs
    Day 15: TPMs - No Exception for Cell Phones
    Day 16: TPMs - No Exception for Fair Dealing
    Day 17: TPMs - No Exception for Court Cases, Laws, and Government Documents
    Day 18: TPMs - No Exception for Personal Uses
    Day 19: TPMs - No Exception for Digital Archiving
    Day 20: TPMs - No Exception for Teaching
    Day 21: TPMs - No Exception to Protect Minors
    Day 22: TPMs - No Exception for Filtering Programs
    Day 23: TPMs - No Exception for Obsolete or Broken Digital Locks
    Day 24: TPMs - No Exclusion of Non-Infringing Access
    Day 25: TPMs - Research Exception Limited to Encryption and Security Testing
    Day 26: TPMs - Encryption Research Exception Requires Notice
    Day 27: TPMs - Encryption Research Exception Restricts Peer Review
    Day 28: TPMs - Interoperability Exception, Linux and DVDs
    Day 29: TPMs - Interoperability Exception Restricts Third Parties
    Day 30: TPMs - Anti-circumvention and Privacy
    Day 31: TPMs - Restrictions for Canadians with Perceptual Disabilities
    Day 32: TPMs - Perceptual Disability Provisions May Violate AODA
    Day 33: TPMs - LAM and Educational Institution Limitations, Part One
    Day 34: TPMs - LAM and Educational Institution Limitations, Part Two
    Day 35: TPMs - Unnecessary Coverage of Circumvention Devices
    Day 36: TPMs - No Identification of Authorized Circumventers
    Day 37: TPMs - No Requirement to Unlock for Exceptions
    Day 38: TPMs - No DRM Regulatory Authority
    Day 39: TPMs - No DRM Labelling Requirement
    Day 40: TPMs - No Regular Review Process
     
    ISP: Notice and Notice
    Day 41: ISP Notice and Notice - Mandatory Data Retention
    Day 42: ISP Notice and Notice - No Penalty for False Notices
     
    Information Location Tool Providers – Search Engines
    Day 43: ILTs - Safe Harbour Largely Illusory
    Day 44: ILTs - Notice and Takedown for Search Engines
     
    Making Available Right
    Day 45: Making Available Right and Actual Distribution
     
    Educational Harms
    Day 46: Education Harms - Lesson Provisions Only Extend To Limited Exceptions
    Day 47: Education Harms - Lessons Include Special Infringement Provision
    Day 48: Education Harms - Lessons Must Be Destroyed After the Course
    Day 49: Education Harms - Lessons May Require DRM
    Day 50: Education Harms - Lessons Contain Limited Definition of Students
     
    Education Internet Exception
    Day 51: Education Internet Exception Is Unnecessary
    Day 52: Education Internet Exception Is Harmful
    Day 53: Education Internet Exception Easily Avoided
     
    Library Issues
    Day 54: E-Reserve Provisions Less Effective Than Fair Dealing
    Day 55: E-Reserve Provisions Require DRM
    Day 56: Interlibrary Digital Loans Must Self-Destruct In Five Days
     
    Statutory Damages Reform
    Day 57: Statutory Damages Reform - Uncertainty
    Day 58: Statutory Damages Reform - What It Doesn't Cover
    Day 59: Statutory Damages Reform - Removes Court Discretion For Reduced Damages
     
    Photography Provisions
    Day 60: Photography Provisions

    Section 3 Provision
    Day 61: The Mysterious Section 3

    Comments (4)add comment

    a guest said:

    ...
    Thank you for all your time spent on the 61 reforms michael!

    This should serve as a textbook to the next government.

    voting Anything But Conservative JOIN ME (spread the word ABC)
    September 17, 2008

    Jean-Francois Messier said:

    Publish in a book !!!
    All those articles should be published in a book, to reach more readers. This is perhaps the first time a proposed bill is reviewed, commented and discussed online such as this one. This is a first !!! You're a great writer !
    September 17, 2008

    Maynard G. Krebs said:

    Interesting reading

    Here is the blog of one US lawyer actively engaged in defending people sued by the MPAA and RIAA

    [ link ]

    Down the right side of the web pages are quotes from judges relating to 'infringement' and 'making available' matters. At least some judges pay attention to the facts.


    "[W]ithout actual distribution of copies.... there is no violation [of] the distribution right.Ӕ 4 William F. Patry, Patry on Copyright 13:9 (2007); see also id. N. 10 (collecting cases); Perfect 10, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc., 508 F.3d 1146, 1162 (9th Cir. 2007)(affirming the district courtǒs finding that distribution requires an ӑactual dissemination of a copyҔ)".
    -Hon. Janet Bond Arterton
    District Judge
    District of Connecticut
    February 13, 2008
    Atlantic v. Brennan
    534 F. Supp.2d 278



    "An offer to distribute does not constitute distribution"
    -Hon. Neil V. Wake
    District Judge
    District of Arizona
    April 29, 2008
    Atlantic v. Howell
    2008 ILRWeb (P&F) 1665
    September 18, 2008

    a guest said:

    ...
    The whole 61 posts are well put, but they are missing the point. By the time election is over, the potentially majority Conservative government is going to fast track a C-62 that make C-61 look tame in comparison.
    September 18, 2008

    Write comment
    smaller | bigger

    busy
    Tags:
    , ,
    Share: Slashdot, Digg, Del.icio.us, Newsfeeder, Reddit, StumbleUpon, TwitterEmailPrintPDF
    Related Items: