Text: Small Text  Normal Text  Large Text  Larger Text
  • Blog
  • The Copyright Pledge - 2008 Election Edition

Blog Archive

PrevPrevApril 2014NextNext

The Copyright Pledge - 2008 Election Edition

PDF  | Print |  E-mail
Friday September 26, 2008

Unlike the 2006 election campaign, when copyright reform issues generated political attention in the Toronto riding of Parkdale-High Park, the current campaign has featured local discussions (here, here, here) but has yet to find its "copyright moment."  That is not to say that copyright has been entirely absent - copyright concerns have arisen in the context of political advertising with claims of Conservative copyright infringement serving as a useful reminder of the restrictions under the current law.  Moreover, the absence of copyright discussion from the red-hot culture funding fight demonstrates how little political payoff there is for unbalanced copyright reform as the same groups that applauded C-61 are now among the Conservatives' fiercest critics (ACTRA - before, after; CIRPA - before, after).

With several weeks left in the campaign, there is still a chance to build on the recent emergence of a strong voice for fair copyright in Canada.  I have crafted the following 2008 copyright pledge:

Will you commit to a balanced approach to copyright reform that reflects the views of all Canadians by pledging:

1.    To respect the rights of creators and consumers.

2.    Not to support any copyright bill that undermines or weakens the Copyright Act’s users rights.

3.    To fully consult with Canadians before introducing any copyright reform bill and to conduct inclusive, national hearings on any tabled bill.

While I certainly hope for more from copyright reform (see my fair copyright principles), I believe this a balanced starting point that respects the concerns of all stakeholders and provides a reasonable path toward reform.  If you agree, there are at least three things you can do.  First, urge all political parties to agree to the pledge.  Second, raise the issue with your local candidates - attend a town hall meeting or debate, pose the question if a candidate knocks at your door, or send an email to all the candidates in your riding.  Third, email your copyright question to question@electiondebate08.ca.  There are still 18 days left in the campaign which provides plenty of time to ensure that fair copyright concerns are heard before election day.

Update: My initial posting asked parties (not candidates) to "sign on to" the pledge. As noted in the comments, a candidate cannot legally "sign a written document" that would incorporate the pledge.  Of course, no one is asking either parties or candidates to sign anything.  In the same manner that parties have promised to increase arts funding or introduce anti-spam legislation, they can certainly commit to the copyright approach described above. 

Update II: In response to several requests, a French language version of the pledge:

Vous engagerez-vous dans une approche équilibrée de la réforme sur le droit d'auteur qui reflète les opinions de tous les Canadiens et Canadiennes en promettant:

1. de respecter les droits des créateurs et des consommateurs

2. de ne pas supporter tout projet de loi sur le droit d'auteur détruisant ou diminuant les droits des utilisateurs face à la Loi sur le droit d'auteur

3. De consulter pleinement les Canadiens et Canadiennes avant d'introduire toute réforme sur le droit d'auteur et de tenir des audiences nationales inclusives sur tout projet de loi proposé.

Comments (12)add comment

a guest said:

ya I thought this pledge was a great idea.. however I have just been informed:

it is illegal for candidates to sign a pledge. Section 550 of the Election Act states: "No candidate shall sign a written document presented by way of demand or claim made on him or her by any person or association of persons, between the issue of a writ and polling day, if the document requires the candidate to follow a course of action that will prevent him or her from excercising freedom of action in Parliament, if elected, or to resign as a member if called on to do so by any person or associated persons"

soo only ask them to "agree" to it not sign anything

September 26, 2008

Joss said:

All that
FilthyRichmond.com is tha taint.
September 26, 2008

Michel Donais said:

I\\m wondering again...
Last time we had an election, majority or minority, immediately after the Conservatives won, they made sure to pass as many legislations as possible, many that were not unanimous.

Now with this election, there are many contested bills in study, including C-61. I wouldn't be so surprised they want to do exactly the same with all these C-61, C-484 and C-10. Let say we have another minority, imagine the first day they can enact such legislation, they are sending all these as votes of confidence... at that point, who would start another political campaign?

That would certainly explain the unexpected election. That way, instead being demolished on these important topics by the opposition and sent into election immediately, they get their mandate back, and then leave the bad press to the opponents. It would explain why they were in a hurry to finalize these bills, then take a pause, then call a new election. This is why I am not hoping for the best on such pledge.

I totally agree the 3rd point should be mandatory. I do believe large associations have their words to say, but on such level, everyone would be affected. More importantly, right now, most people in Canada would have done something illegal on that bill at least once in the past years, meaning they could potentially be arrested. That's what I call a lot of implication.

(Sorry if my thoughts are blurry this morning, way too many things to think, and going to work in 5 minutes ;) )
September 27, 2008

a guest said:

The Conservatives look set to win a majority. As their candidates aren't even allowed to appear in public, never mind speak to anyone, my guess is C-61 will be reintroduced, probably with a few small fixes, and no major changes.
September 27, 2008

Concerned said:

What a dumb law that protects big partie
So who made the dumb law that says they can't sign a pledge and who do we fire for that.

Sounds a might bit undemocratic and it would be something that people could hold a candidate too. Something that might make the democracy work instead of that FOLLOW the LEADER mentality THAT HAS GOT US HERE.
September 27, 2008

WOW said:

Japan will get 1 GPBS to the home in October
[ link ]

canada we get same old same old
japans price of 56USD for 1000megabit
what my cost for 5 megabit?
200 times cheaper bandwidth in japan!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
September 27, 2008

YOU MEAN said:

Conservatives Continue SLIDE in the poll
to the noob above the neo cons are not looking even close ot a majority more like they have been slowly sliding poll after poll
repeat after me SLIDING everyone knows they only care about alberta
( whose not traffic shaped????? )
uh huh.
September 27, 2008

a guest said:

crowd-source good questions
Google Moderator:

on ArsTechnica: [ link ] Google unveils Moderator: crowd-source good questions

And here is "Canadian Federal Election 2008" to get started:

[ link ]

September 28, 2008

Sean Mitchell said:

This pledge is fluff, it has no meat, few specifics. The language is so vague that it would be meaningless... Jim Prentice could take this pledge and stand up and tell you that his bill lives up to it.

Sorry, I just don't see the point.
September 29, 2008

andrea said:

The Truth About
This vote is important! Check Out The Truth About… for expert opinions on Your Vote -- [ link ]
September 29, 2008

David Caplan - NDP Candidate i said:

2008 election copyright pledge
Hi Michael,

I'm a big fan of your work, and I enthusiatically endorse and commit to your Copyright Pledge - 2008 Edition. I would be honoured to see my name added to the roll call of supporters on your blog.

Keep up the great work, and all the best Michael,


P.S. You can phone me at 604-999-5341 to confirm my identity if you consider it advisable.
October 03, 2008

hanane said:

check this ou
In the race to the moment of truth people are still deciding who to
vote for as the next most influential person in the world.
In order to make the decision easier, a dutch company called
Kieskompas has developed the Electoral Compass. This voting advice
application is one of a kind. All the important issues are embedded in
the application that makes it easy to see where you fit in the
political compass. To what extent are you progressive (social liberal)
or traditional (social conservative) or left or right in economical
terms. And which candidate do you relate to the most.

If you haven't decided who to vote for than take the test.
November 04, 2008

Write comment
smaller | bigger

, ,
Share: Slashdot, Digg, Del.icio.us, Newsfeeder, Reddit, StumbleUpon, TwitterEmailPrintPDF
Related Items: