Moore Says Copyright Reform Bill Likely in the Fall |
| Print | |
|
Tuesday February 10, 2009
|
|||||
|
Canadian Heritage Minister James Moore appeared before the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage yesterday. Liberal MP Scott Simms asked specific questions about the future of Canadian copyright reform. Moore confirmed the shared responsibility for copyright with Industry Minister Tony Clement. He indicated that the timing for a new bill was still being worked out, but that the fall was more likely than the spring. He also acknowledged some of the concerns associated with Bill C-61, though argued that it moved in the "right direction." Moore's opening remarks are also noteworthy, since they demonstrate that the Clement - Moore duo may be the most technologically savvy Ministers in the Industry - Heritage portfolios in recent memory. Notes Moore:
Rapidly changing technologies are having a huge impact on the sector; they are bringing challenges but also new opportunities. There are now more ways to reach audiences- for instance social networking websites such as Facebook and Myspace. In fact, 34% of Canadians under the age of 20 use such sites to discover new music and art. The cultural industry is reaching them there - building artists’ profiles online instead of advertising through the traditional means such as flyers, radio and television. Comments (2)
![]()
anonymous
said:
|
|||||
|
Personability Hopeful for some wisdom, but personability was what got George W. Bush elected. Twice. |
|
Net Neutrality: The Internet is For Everyone Here is what I got from Justin Beach on Facebook: " Canadians have until February 16 to weigh in on Net Neutrality. If you already know what that is visit http://www.unionvoice.org/campaign/crtc_submission and let the CRTC know what you think. If you're not sure what Net Neutrality is visit http://www.publicbroadcasting.ca/2009/02/net-neutrality-last-chance-to-weigh-in.html " I would also like to refer you to this RFC by Vint Cerf, called "The Internet is For Everyone". http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc3271.html |