Text: Small Text  Normal Text  Large Text  Larger Text

Blog Archive

PrevPrevMay 2012NextNext
SMTWTFS
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031

CIRA Domain Name Dispute Panel Finds Reverse Hijacking

PDF  | Print |  E-mail
Friday April 24, 2009
A CIRA domain name dispute resolution panel has issued the first clear finding of reverse hijacking (essentially a bad faith complaint).  The case involved the forsale.ca domain.
Comments (2)add comment

runescape gold said:

runescape gold
Buy runescape accounts as low Pirce! We never rest so that we can offer you the best. We're here 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Get the most out of your game time and level with the best!
April 24, 2009

Dan Cera: DomainCop.com said:

Reverse Domain Hijacking Ruling
I find it interesting that it took the better part of a decade for panelists presiding over the Canadian domain name dispute resolution process to return a decision of reverse domain name hijacking and somewhat ironic that they chose to do so in an instance where the complainant actually owned a registered trademark interest in a term that was by any definition confusingly similar. I am not questioning the correctness of the ruling per se, I am merely suggesting that this case may well go down in history as the only case ever to be decided under the CDRP (UDRP or NAF for that matter)in which a decision of reverse domain name hijacking was rendered where the complainant had a certified trademark interest.
May 05, 2009

Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy
Tags:
, , ,
Share: Slashdot, Digg, Del.icio.us, Newsfeeder, Reddit, StumbleUpon, TwitterEmailPrintPDF
Related Items: