Text: Small Text  Normal Text  Large Text  Larger Text

Blog Archive

SMTWTFS
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
26272829

Bill Henderson on the SAC Proposal

PDF  | Print |  E-mail
Thursday August 20, 2009
Bill Henderson has an op-ed in the Georgia Straight (which btw has been providing a great diversity of perspectives on copyright) promoting the Songwriters Association of Canada legalized P2P proposal.
Comments (2)add comment

Anon-K said:

SAC has softened it a bit...
Although there are still parts of the proposal that I have problems with. First of all, it is an opt-out system, not opt-in... basically a negative option billing scheme, which, if I understand it correctly is banned.

Secondly, it specifically mentions that broadband and wireless customers would have the option to opt-out. What about dial-up subscribers? Will they be billed and not have the option to opt-out? Dialup users are even less likely to engage in this simply because it isn't particularly useful at dialup speeds (for instance, at home I get 26.4 kbps... at that speed, it takes about 40 minutes to download a 3 minute song).

They might get a better reception if it was an opt-in system.
August 20, 2009

Big Money said:

Then what
Thats like the last time when this topic was brought up here, around a year ago, and some song writer association wanted people to pay something like 5$/month to download all they want.

Again, I'll make the same argument using only Bell Canada stated figure of over 2-million internet subscribers (think this may have only been high speed)

5$/month x 2-million = $10,000,000 a month

Thats an insane value for only 1 ISP in Canada.

+ the hundreds of million in their levy.

I would rather see money like that funneled into health care or research into diseases like cancer or leukemia etc.

After 3 years then what? They will want to increase it to 8$/month because they aren't making enough. Music only?

Voluntary?

Why not just make a new tax line on the income tax? Artist tax. If you bought so much and have receipts, then the value should be 0$.

What would people pay per year on their income tax for such an Artist tax? Worth 60$/year? And if you can prove you bought say some arbitrary number like 120$ worth should it be 0 on the tax line?

But instead he is just saying give me.
August 20, 2009

Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy
Tags:
, , , , ,
Share: Slashdot, Digg, Del.icio.us, Newsfeeder, Reddit, StumbleUpon, TwitterEmailPrintPDF
Related Items: