Text: Small Text  Normal Text  Large Text  Larger Text
  • Blog
  • European Parliament ACTA Resolution Passes Overwhelmingly, Threatens Possible Court Action

Blog Archive

PrevPrevApril 2014NextNext
SMTWTFS
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930

European Parliament ACTA Resolution Passes Overwhelmingly, Threatens Possible Court Action

PDF  | Print |  E-mail
Wednesday March 10, 2010
The European Parliament today overwhelming approved a resolution on ACTA calling for transparency and raising concerns about substantive elements in the treaty such as the prospect of three strikes and personal border searches.  The final vote was 633 in favour, 13 against, and 16 abstentions.  The final approved text raises further issues:
  • the European Parliament "deplores the calculated choice of the parties not to negotiate through well-established international bodies, such as WIPO and WTO, which have established frameworks for public information and consultation"
  • It says "further ACTA negotiations should include a larger number of developing and emerging countries, with a view to reaching a possible multilateral level of negotiation"
  • provides that "any agreement must include the stipulation that the closing-off of an individual’s Internet access shall be subject to prior examination by a court"
  • warns that "ACTA provisions, notably measures aimed at strengthening powers for cross-border inspection and seizure of goods, should not affect global access to legitimate, affordable and safe medicinal products – including innovative and generic products – on the pretext of combating counterfeiting"
As for next steps, the European Parliament clearly wants action as the resolution also states that it "stresses that, unless Parliament is immediately and fully informed at all stages of the negotiations, it reserves its right to take suitable action, including bringing a case before the Court of Justice in order to safeguard its prerogatives."   This marks a major step toward ACTA transparency, highlighting the near-unanimous discomfort with the process and substance of ACTA to date.
Comments (9)add comment

maebnoom said:

...
Heading in the right direction...
March 10, 2010

Jason K said:

...
Why are we not getting the near-unanimous discomfort with the process and substance of ACTA in Canada if we support transparency? Why after 2 years is the EU spear heading this? Canadians used to stand tall on the global stage with respect to our Democratic rights, what happened? Oh yeah, forgot the conservative movement the majority of Canadians don't support in Canada. That might explain it.
March 10, 2010

A. Coward said:

At least this weakens the "meet our international obligations" nonsense.
They could have pulled the policy laundering trick off if they managed perfect secrecy. Each of us should give an ounce of gratitude for the individuals who dared to bring this into the light.
March 10, 2010

Laurel L. Russwurm said:

Go Europe!
I must say that I like the line:

"on the pretext of combating counterfeiting"

You have to wonder though... isn't the UK (with their Digital Economy Bill) part of the EU?

And isn't CETA ... the Canada-Europe Trade Agreement... advocating many of the same things as ACTA?

So, great, but taken with a grain of salt.
March 11, 2010

AlB said:

Potentially crippling to ACTA
Given the secrecy around ACTA negotiations it would not surprise me if many of the participants (specifically industry lobbyist) would rather walk away than have their involvement and positions made public.
March 11, 2010

Crockett said:

Who's in charge?
OK, I'm a little confused ... if the EU representatives on the ACTA negotiations are not sharing the details of said negotiations without threat of being sued by the the EU parliament. The who exactly is running this dog & pony show?
March 11, 2010

Vomio said:

...
I 'm not so sure that the ACTA negotiations can survive in the light of day and the scrutiny of John Q. Public.
Daylight will surely kill the vampires.
I don't see it as "a major step towards ACTA transparency", I see it as a torpedo to the bow.
It will be interesting to see how it goes down.
March 11, 2010

Jon said:

great news!
But I'm not holding a celebration until we get some sort of Canadian equivilent, instead of the sick suspicion that the Harper government is just waiting to jump at the chance to sneak conservative policy into law without having to fight it past a minority parliament.
(I can maintain hope that the whole thing will implode if the EU somehow manages to force public disclosure, but not holding my breath on that one)
March 11, 2010

crade said:

@Jon
Yes, even if it falls apart, I would be dissapointed if our government doesn't speak up for us. It may already be late, but common guys, take this chance to show that Canada believes in democracy too!
March 11, 2010

Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy
Tags:
, , , , , ,
Share: Slashdot, Digg, Del.icio.us, Newsfeeder, Reddit, StumbleUpon, TwitterEmailPrintPDF
Related Items: