Why Bill C-11's Digital Lock Rules May Hurt Copyright Enforcement
|| Print ||
Tuesday June 12, 2012
we have a concern that aspects of the Copyright Act may actually have an unintended consequence with respect to our local technology community and our ability help people in the protection of their intellectual property. Specifically, our concern is that the anti-circumvention provisions could create legal uncertainty where that would actually discourage the use of forensics to detect infringement of other forms of intellectual property. Even though the fact is that the circumvention of those protection measures actually have nothing to do with the copyright material under protection.
While the committee legislation is now passed and will soon be enacted we will continue our pledge to continue to work with the government and the appropriate bodies to ensure that the regulatory language bringing the act into force are clear and precise so they do not hinder the full and forceful protection of Canadian intellectual property and the protection of intellectual property creators and owners in the international marketplace.
In fact, MP Cheryl Gallant later asked how to address the problem and Page responds:
There are a number of ways to do that. We've looked at the legislation around the world and if you look at New Zealand's legislation, for example, they have the concept of an authorized circumventor which essentially defines the situation where circumvention is allowed. Certainly, with our own act there is an investigative exemption and we think if the investigative exemption actually was modified to include the investigating breaches of all laws and international IP treaties as well, that could be a focus of it as well.
In our mind, it's really more the intent of breaching the TPMs than the act itself. Obviously, breaching a TPM for the purpose of infringing and for copyrighting should be a breach of the law and heavily prosecuted. But we believe under the fair dealings provision, as well, that you should be allowed to circumvent any provision to actually investigate breaches of personal rights. So it's the circumstances under which you would actually investigate.
Page's comments and suggestions for reform were the same ones the Bill C-11 heard repeatedly from dozens of witnesses and thousands of Canadians. It rejected those amendments, leaving intact provisions that now even IP enforcement companies say will make their job more difficult.
Devil's Advocate said:
Chris Brand said:
Jason K said:
end user said:
ajay dhiman said:
Mike Keller said:
Tuesday June 12, 2012