Text: Small Text  Normal Text  Large Text  Larger Text
  • Blog
  • CETA Update, Part Two: ACTA Provisions Are Still Very Much Alive

Blog Archive

PrevPrevApril 2014NextNext

CETA Update, Part Two: ACTA Provisions Are Still Very Much Alive

PDF  | Print |  E-mail
Thursday August 09, 2012
Steve Verheul, the lead Canadian negotiator for the Canada - EU Trade Agreement, provided an update on the CETA negotiations last week on a call with civil society groups. My first post on the call included an update on the timing of future rounds, the lack of transparency with the negotiations, and the state of patents in CETA. This post focuses on the link between CETA and ACTA. During the call, I had the opportunity to directly raise the issue of the inclusion of ACTA provisions within CETA and ask for comment on the European Commission claims that the IP chapter will ultimately look much like the EU - South Korea FTA.

The Canadian response provided a different take from the European Commission. On the issue of ACTA provisions within CETA, Verheul confirmed that the ACTA Internet provider provision had been removed and that the EU was re-evaluating what it hopes to achieve in light of the European Parliament's rejection of ACTA last month.  However, Verheul noted that the ACTA criminal provisions were still very much in play and that the European Commission was seeking support from the member states. Since Canada signed ACTA, it may be willing to support the inclusion of ACTA provisions.

Further, Verheul denied claims that the IP chapter would ultimately look like the EU - South Korea FTA. He stated that Canada was not looking at that agreement as a model and that the final chapter would draw on several sources, including TRIPS, the WIPO Internet Treaties, domestic legislation, and ACTA. Given the lack of transparency associated with the CETA discussions (both sides insist that the draft text remain secret), the concerns that CETA may replicate ACTA appear to be very real despite the denials from the European Commission.
Comments (3)add comment

Byte said:

OK, so much of ACTA is indeed still alive, but it won't matter until the MEPs get back from their vacations.

What I wonder about: is the 2-decade or twenty (20) year copyright term extension demand still alive? This is being kept out of the limelight, but is VERY relevant to the Canadian public; those alive now with e-readers and those born soon with personal audio players (we'll probably all be dead or at least senile before anything on the sound recording front hits the public domain).
August 13, 2012

mac makeup sale said:

rel="nofollow" href="http://www.macmakeupprosale.com mac makeup
September 07, 2012

Maurice said:

Why ACTA is so evil
Anheuser Busch ( now Internrew IBI) have been trying to steal the Budweiser trademark from Budvar in Czech since 1907!

Local courts across UK and Europe have supported them. ACTA would trump those wins!

Here is news on the Latest win by the original Budweiser brewery:

September 17, 2012

Write comment
smaller | bigger

Share: Slashdot, Digg, Del.icio.us, Newsfeeder, Reddit, StumbleUpon, TwitterEmailPrintPDF
Related Items: