Text: Small Text  Normal Text  Large Text  Larger Text
  • Blog
  • EU Drops Demands for Inclusion of ACTA's Criminal IP Provisions in CETA

Blog Archive

PrevPrevApril 2014NextNext
SMTWTFS
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930

EU Drops Demands for Inclusion of ACTA's Criminal IP Provisions in CETA

PDF  | Print |  E-mail
Thursday November 01, 2012
Reports this morning from EDRI, a European digital rights group, indicate that Europe has now dropped demands to include ACTA-style intellectual property criminal provisions within the Canada - EU Trade Agreement. The inclusion of IP criminal provisions in CETA was the source of considerable outrage in Europe in the aftermath of the European Parliament's rejection of ACTA in early July.  EDRI reports that the European Council obtained support over the summer from member states to drop demands for the criminal provisions, fearing those provisions could lead to a European rejection of the treaty (the Dutch government has already indicated it will not support CETA if it includes ACTA provisions).

The removal of ACTA's criminal provisions leave only two copyright-related question marks in CETA. First, the ACTA border measures provisions have yet to be determined as they are being discussed within the context of protection for geographical indications. Second, Canada is still seeking the inclusion of criminal anti-camcording rules. Canada adopted those rules in 2007 under significant pressure from the United States. Europe resisted their inclusion within ACTA, resulting in a provision that is optional rather than mandatory. While Canada is seeking a mandatory rule, it seems likely this is a (very weak) bargaining chip, rather than a serious attempt to require criminal anti-camcording measures. Canada may drop the demand during negotiations later this month over pharmaceutical patent reform. Regardless, the European Parliament's rejection of ACTA has clearly had a significant impact on CETA as the Internet and criminal provisions are now both apparently gone in the face of widespread European opposition.
Comments (3)add comment

Crockett said:

Good riddance!
I heard these claims before but it is wonderful that we are now getting some credible conformation. I don't have much of a problem with geographical indications, but am still concerned with the possible cost increases on prescription drugs. I know many people, living in a rural area like myself, who are low wage & don't have extended medical benefits, increased prescription costs will hit them hardest.

Otherwise this seems another win for the public over the corporations, I know its never quite that simple but it is heartening nonetheless. We can now add CETA to the increasingly long list of failed attempts by the media industries to over criminalize IP. The six-strikes infringement system going in place in the USA at least seems to be cognizant of this new reality, remains to be seem if it will be fair or effective.
November 01, 2012

gurjeet said:

...
who are low wage & don't have extended medical benefits, increased prescription costs will hit them hardest.

http://gurjeetguri.blogspot.com
November 19, 2012

Best Legal Herbal Incense said:

Best Legal Herbal Incense
I have gain so much information from this blog.I like your blog.Thanks for the post.I am waiting for your new post.soccer skills. for more info cick here Best Legal Herbal Incense
July 16, 2013

Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy
Tags:
, ,
Share: Slashdot, Digg, Del.icio.us, Newsfeeder, Reddit, StumbleUpon, TwitterEmailPrintPDF
Related Items: