Text: Small Text  Normal Text  Large Text  Larger Text
  • Blog
  • Privacy Commissioner of Canada Sets Out Targets for PIPEDA Reform

Blog Archive

PrevPrevApril 2014NextNext
SMTWTFS
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930

Privacy Commissioner of Canada Sets Out Targets for PIPEDA Reform

PDF  | Print |  E-mail
Thursday May 23, 2013
Privacy Commissioner of Canada Jennifer Stoddart this morning set out her office's goals for PIPEDA reform. The last attempt to reform the private sector privacy law stalled in the House of Commons with Bill C-12 still technically alive (having been sitting at second reading for months) but destined to die once the government hits the legislative reset button in the summer. The five-year mandatory review of PIPEDA is now years behind schedule, so Stoddart's attempt to kick-start the process is a welcome development.

The PIPEDA report focuses on four areas of reform: stronger enforcement powers, mandatory security breach disclosure, increased transparency on personal information disclosures, and heightened accountability. In particular, the OPC is calling for:
  • Reform PIPEDA to provide for stronger enforcement powers. These could include statutory damages (administered by the Federal Court); or giving the Commissioner the power to make orders; or affording the Commissioner with the power to impose administrative monetary penalties; or a combination of the above;
  • Require organizations to report breaches of personal information to the Commissioner and to notify affected individuals, where warranted, so that appropriate mitigating measures can be taken in a timely manner;
  • Require organizations to publicly report on the number of disclosures they make to law enforcement under paragraph 7(3)(c.1), without knowledge or consent, and without judicial warrant, in order to shed light on the frequency and use of this extraordinary exception; and
  • Modify the accountability principle in Schedule 1 to include a requirement for organizations to demonstrate accountability upon request; to incorporate the concept of “enforceable agreements”; and to make certain accountability provisions subject to review by the Federal Court.
The report is a great start, but will require leadership from the Minister of Industry that has to date been absent.
Comments (2)add comment

pat donovan said:

and in other news
the open media people are cir'ing a petation, one of several hammering the harper gov't today.

sign 'em all, collect the whole set. woo-hoo!

save the CBC from overight, PETRS (pacfic trade), anti-spyware (this), robo calls, f-35

plus the idiocy stuff.. duf, et al.

OK, what's getting snuck by in the mindless sound +fury here? More monsanto? NAFTA?
6 million immigrants with a quebec subsiity?

worse yet, this is just another day in the life...

have a slice, people.

pat donovan
May 23, 2013

Nullify said:

We should be careful about this
As I recall, a certain C-12, while having some good provisions, also included the unfortunate measure to allow the police to easily intercept your information without a warrant in the name of national security, and to make the "sharing" of said information between tech companies and the police much easier as well.

I do not trust our gov't enough to think that this won't get tried again.
May 26, 2013

Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy
Tags:
,
Share: Slashdot, Digg, Del.icio.us, Newsfeeder, Reddit, StumbleUpon, TwitterEmailPrintPDF
Related Items: