Post Tagged with: "Copyright Canada"

61 Reforms to C-61, Day 59: Statutory Damages Reform – Removes Court Discretion For Reduced Damages

While the new statutory damages provision may create a ceiling of $500 in damages for certain infringements, it also creates a minimum that is higher than the current statute.  The drafting is complex, but the change is as follows:

Read more ›

September 11, 2008 1 comment News

61 Reforms to C-61, Day 58: Statutory Damages Reform – What It Doesn’t Cover

The problems associated with the statutory damages reform extend beyond the questions it raises.  The provision is presumably a response to the over 30,000 file sharing lawsuits in the United States which each bring the prospect of millions in liability.  Politically, the image of that kind of liability for Canadians would not sell well on the campaign trail.  Yet notwithstanding the intent, the current provision does very little to address the prospect of enormous liability for all sorts of activities.

The new provision would likely reduce liability for downloading (though downloading of sound recordings is already arguably permitted due to the private copying levy), however, it certainly does not address uploading or the making available of content on file sharing networks without authorization.  This means that BitTorrent users – who simultaneously upload and download – will still face the possible liability of $20,000 per infringement.  Similarly, uploading a copyrighted work to YouTube raises the same potential liability. 

Read more ›

September 10, 2008 3 comments News

61 Reforms to C-61, Day 57: Statutory Damages Reform – Uncertainty

Reforms to the statutory damages provisions formed a big part of the government's communication strategy for Bill C-61.  Although scooped by the National Post, Industry Minister Jim Prentice emphasized the introduction of amendments to the statutory damages provisions that purportedly create limits for damages that arise from "private purposes" infringement.  […]

Read more ›

September 9, 2008 4 comments News

61 Reforms to C-61, Day 55: E-Reserve Provisions Require DRM

The problems with the e-reserve provisions in C-61 extend beyond just the fair dealing concerns.  In order to qualify for the exception, librarians are required to implement DRM-based solutions on the distribution of electronic materials.  Yesterday I pointed to the provision that expressly permits digital reproduction.  Section 30.02(3) adds two […]

Read more ›

September 5, 2008 9 comments News

ITWorldCanada on the End of C-61

ITWorldCanada writes about the imminent demise of C-61, citing several people who signed its petition opposing the bill.

Read more ›

September 4, 2008 1 comment Must Reads