|
Friday November 04, 2011 |
Peter Nowak has a great interview
with Maxime Gagne, a lawyer with Heenan Blaikie who represents video
game developers. Asked specifically about an exception to the Bill C-11
digital lock rules for private use, Gagne states:
I haven’t seen the exception but
there could be ways that it’s crafted that wouldn’t necessarily make it
pointless. It would allow private copying but still prevent the uses
that are technically restricted to the author of the work, meaning
distribution or public performance of the work. That would still be
considered infringement. You could break the DRM and make a private
copy but you can’t break the DRM and make 160 copies and sell it. It
doesn’t render the provision pointless, it just makes clear that there
are certain limited uses that you’ll be able to do.
c-11, copyright, digital locks, video games Slashdot, Digg, Del.icio.us, Newsfeeder, Reddit, StumbleUpon, TwitterTagsShareFriday November 04, 2011 |
|
|
Thursday November 03, 2011 |
The Association
of Newfoundland and Labrador Archives represents archives, archivists,
and individuals committed to the preservation of archival records in
the province. It provided a submission
in the national copyright consultation that included the following on
digital lock rules:
Prohibiting circumvention for legal
purposes such as preservation
activities by archivists to protect the documentary heritage of Canada
is not acceptable to archivists. Archivists believe that circumvention
of technological measures should only be prohibited when the
circumvention is for the purpose of infringing copyright. Similarly,
circumvention tools and services should be available for non-infringing
uses.
Previous Daily Digital Locks: Provincial
Resource Centre for the Visually Impaired (PRCVI) BC, Canadian
Consumer Initiative, Retail
Council of Canada, Canadian
Council of Archives, Canadian
Teachers' Federation, Canadian
Federation of Students, Canadian
Civil Liberties Association, Documentary
Organization of Canada, Canadian
Library Association, Council of
Ministers of Education Canada, Business
Coalition for Balanced Copyright, Canadian
Association of Research Libraries, Canadian
Historical Association, Canadian
National Institute for the Blind, Canadian
Bookseller Association, Canadian Home
and School Federation, Film Studies
Association of Canada, Canadian Bar
Association, Canadian
Federation for the Humanities and Social Sciences, Appropriation
Art, Privacy
Commissioner of Canada
archives, c-11, copyright, digital lock Slashdot, Digg, Del.icio.us, Newsfeeder, Reddit, StumbleUpon, TwitterTagsShareThursday November 03, 2011 |
|
|
Thursday November 03, 2011 |
|
ACTRA is in Ottawa this week for one of its regular lobbying
efforts.
Copyright will undoubtedly form part of the effort and will apparently
include an unexpected issue. Leah Pinsent is fighting against the Bill
C-11 mashup provision, which allows Canadians to create new works for
non-commercial purposes with attribution. Pinsent argues that mashups
are "morally wrong" and constitute a form of plagiarism. For a
different perspective, see RIP: A Remix
Manifesto, one of the most critically lauded films on remix and
mashup, funded by the National Film Board and created by Montreal's
Brett Gaylor. Alternatively, see the mashup
created by Toronto's Josh Raskin, who was nominated for an Oscar in
2008 for his animated short film I Met The Walrus.
actra, c-11, copyright, mashups, pinsent Slashdot, Digg, Del.icio.us, Newsfeeder, Reddit, StumbleUpon, TwitterTagsShareThursday November 03, 2011 |
|
|
Wednesday November 02, 2011 |
The Privacy Commissioner of Canada has not spoken out on the recent
copyright bills, but in 2008 she wrote a public letter
to then-Industry Minister Jim Prentice expressing concern "about
possible changes to the Act authorizing the use of technical mechanisms
to prevent copyright infringement that could have a negative impact on
the privacy rights of Canadians." The Stoddart letter, which came in
the aftermath of the Sony rootkit case, stated:
If DRM technologies only controlled
copying and use of content, our Office would have few concerns.
However, DRM technologies can also collect detailed personal
information from users, who often do no more than access the content on
a computer. This information is transmitted back to the copyright owner
or content provider, without the consent or knowledge of the user.
Although the means exist to circumvent these technologies and thus
prevent the collection of this information, previous proposals to amend
the Copyright Act contained anti-circumvention provisions.
Commissioner Stoddart has not commented on the adequacy of the personal
information exception in Bill C-11, but there is reason for concern.
c-11, copyright, digital locks, privacy, stoddart Slashdot, Digg, Del.icio.us, Newsfeeder, Reddit, StumbleUpon, TwitterTagsShareWednesday November 02, 2011 |
|
View
|
|
|