|
Monday January 28, 2013 |
|
The European Commission has posted a public update
on the status of the agricultural provisions in the proposed Canada -
EU Trade Agreement. The EC says the goal is to conclude the agreement at
a Ministerial meeting in Ottawa on February 7th, though reports suggest
that may be overly optimistic. The state of the agricultural
provisions is described as follows: Slashdot, Digg, Del.icio.us, Newsfeeder, Reddit, StumbleUpon, TwitterTagsShareMonday January 28, 2013 |
|
View
|
|
|
Monday September 13, 2010 |
|
Confirming earlier comments from the European Commission, French
government officials have told
NGO groups that they are willing to walk away from ACTA if the
agreement does not include coverage of geographical indications.
Slashdot, Digg, Del.icio.us, Newsfeeder, Reddit, StumbleUpon, TwitterTagsShareMonday September 13, 2010 |
|
|
Tuesday July 27, 2010 |
The Department of Foreign Affairs held a call today with various groups to provide an update on the Canada - European Union Comprehensive Trade Agreement negotiations. The department indicated that there has been progress on virtually all issues and the broad shape of the deal is being outlined.
On intellectual property, the EU is still reflecting on Bill C-32. The department indicated that they have not identified any specific concerns but are weighing whether there are any provisions worth fighting over as part of the broader negotiations. They are concerned with some copyright issues not included in the bill, notably broadcasting and resale rights. Interestingly, copyright term extension was apparently not identified as a concern. There was very little progress on the other IP issues - some clarification on IP enforcement on EU demands, but no progress on the text; no progress on patents with some significant divergence on these issues, and no progress on geographical indications. There is Canadian concern that the EU demands on GIs may conflict with trademarks, common names, and have negative economic implications. The department indicated that the GI issue in CETA was separate from the issue in ACTA. Slashdot, Digg, Del.icio.us, Newsfeeder, Reddit, StumbleUpon, TwitterTagsShareTuesday July 27, 2010 |
|
|
Thursday July 22, 2010 |
Over the past week, I have had several posts on ACTA in the wake of the
most recent leaked text, including a scorecard
on the major remaining areas of disagreement, one assessing the growing rift
between the U.S. and E.U., Canadian positions
on ACTA, the changed U.S.
position on anti-circumvention rules, and a look at geographical
indications, a key issue for the EU. On top of these posts,
there is additional information
disclosed last weekend
that Luc Devigne, the lead EU negotiator is taking on new
responsibilities (though the EU says he will continue on ACTA).
Putting the pieces together, I think it may be worth considering
whether the EU is
prepared to walk away from ACTA altogether, leaving the U.S. with a far
smaller
agreement that cannot credibly claim to set a standard for the G8 or
developed world.
Why raise this possibility?
Slashdot, Digg, Del.icio.us, Newsfeeder, Reddit, StumbleUpon, TwitterTagsShareThursday July 22, 2010 |
|
View
|
|
|