|
Friday March 02, 2012 |
|
The CRTC has written
to Rogers Communication following the identification of yet another
violation of the Commission's Internet traffic management policy.
Rogers has announced plans to drop its traffic throttling practices,
but the CRTC wants the new issue addressed immediately. I discussed the
role of the CRTC in putting an end to Internet throttling in a recent
column on the Rogers case (Ottawa
Citizen version, homepage
version).
crtc, itmp, net neutrality, rogers Slashdot, Digg, Del.icio.us, Newsfeeder, Reddit, StumbleUpon, TwitterTagsShareFriday March 02, 2012 |
|
|
Monday February 06, 2012 |
|
Last week Rogers advised
the CRTC that it plans to drop
Internet throttling for all customers by the end of the year. The
move was not unexpected given that its policy was an outlier
among all major Canadian ISPs. I'll have more to say on this
development soon.
itmp, net neutrality, rogers, throttling Slashdot, Digg, Del.icio.us, Newsfeeder, Reddit, StumbleUpon, TwitterTagsShareMonday February 06, 2012 |
|
|
Friday January 13, 2012 |
|
Sarah Schmidt of Postmedia reports
that net neutrality complaints to the CRTC have accelerated over the
past six months.
crtc, itmp, net neutrality Slashdot, Digg, Del.icio.us, Newsfeeder, Reddit, StumbleUpon, TwitterTagsShareFriday January 13, 2012 |
|
|
Tuesday December 20, 2011 |
Bell advised
the CRTC yesterday that it plans to drop all peer-to-peer traffic
shaping (often called throttling) as of March 1, 2012. While the
decision has been described as surprising
or as quid
pro quo for the usage based billing ruling, I think it is neither
of those. The writing was on the wall in October when Bell announced
that it was dropping the traffic shaping for wholesale traffic, citing
reduced network congestion from P2P. At the time I wrote that the Bell
move:
raises the prospect that Bell's
current throttling practices may now violate the CRTC's Internet
traffic management guidelines. While Bell says its congestion has been
reduced, its retail throttling practices have remained unchanged,
throttling P2P applications from 4:30 pm to 2:00 am. Given the
decline
in congestion, a CRTC complaint might ask whether the current
throttling policy "results in discrimination or preference as little as
reasonably possible" and ask for explanation why its data cap policies
"would not reasonably address the need and effectively achieve the same
purpose as the ITMP."
The CRTC Internet
traffic management practice policy,
often referred to as the net neutrality rules, make it clear that the
Commission prefers network investment and "economic ITMPs" (ie. usage
charges) to traffic shaping. The Bell
letter
to the CRTC addresses this directly, citing its network investment, the
use of economic ITMPs, and declining P2P file sharing as a proportion
of network traffic as the reason for the change. Given the CRTC rules,
Bell had little choice but to drop traffic shaping since it was
increasingly difficult to justify given network and marketplace
developments.
The big question is now how much longer Rogers will maintain its throttling
practices. Most of the larger Canadian ISPs no longer traffic shape
(Cogeco seems to have quietly
dropped it after maintaining just two years ago that it had no
other alternative),
leaving Rogers as the outlier. Moreover, the company is currently
facing an enforcement action for violating the CRTC ITMP rules with
respect to the impact its throttling practices have had on online
gaming. The company might try hold out for awhile, but given the
network congestion profile in Canada and CRTC pressure to address
its net neutrality violations, it seems likely that it will follow
Bell's lead or face
further complaints that its practices do not comply with CRTC policy.
bell, itmp, net neutrality, rogers, traffic shaping Slashdot, Digg, Del.icio.us, Newsfeeder, Reddit, StumbleUpon, TwitterTagsShareTuesday December 20, 2011 |
|
|
