|
Thursday February 02, 2012 |
|
Transport Canada has reportedly
issued a DMCA takedown notice to Scribd over an on-the-record response
it provided to a journalist. The move is particularly odd (though not
unprecedented, see here and here) given the document was issued to
a journalist and the government changed its crown
copyright licence last year to allow for private and non-commercial
public use without the need for further permission.
dmca, takedown, transport canada Slashdot, Digg, Del.icio.us, Newsfeeder, Reddit, StumbleUpon, TwitterTagsShareThursday February 02, 2012 |
|
|
Thursday April 21, 2011 |
|
The UK Music Publishers Association has succeeded in taking down
the International Music Score Library Project, an enormously popular
Canadian-based sheet music site that has posted thousands of public
domain scores. The site has faced legal threats from European
publishers in the past and worked
hard
to ensure that all posted scores are compliant with Canadian copyright
rules. The term of Canadian copyright law is life of the author plus an
additional 50 years, a term compliant with international copyright law.
I wrote
about the site in 2007.
The UK Music Publishers Association filed a DMCA takedown notification with
GoDaddy, IMSLP's domain name registrar, which has frozen the site for
at least ten days. IMSLP has posted more information
about the claim and why it is unfounded. The case highlights yet
again
why demands for a notice-and-takedown approach in Bill C-32 were wisely
rejected by the Conservatives since that system can lead to outcomes
that shut down sites based on unproven allegations. The better
approach - as found in C-32 - was a notice-and-notice approach that
provides an effective deterrent while leaving it to the courts to
determine actual cases of infringement.
Update: The UK Music Publishers Association appears to have acknowledged it was wrong to file the takedown. c-32, copyright, imslp, public domain, takedown Slashdot, Digg, Del.icio.us, Newsfeeder, Reddit, StumbleUpon, TwitterTagsShareThursday April 21, 2011 |
|
|
Friday January 07, 2011 |
Earlier this week I posted
on the UK Bank Card Association demand that Cambridge University take
down a student research paper that the association said overstepped
responsible disclosure. The University responds
[PDF]:
"you seem to think that we might
censor a student’s thesis, which is lawful and already in the public
domain, simply because a powerful interest finds it inconvenient. This
shows a deep misconception of what universities are and how we work.
Cambridge is the University of Erasmus, of Newton, and of Darwin;
censoring writings that offend the powerful is offensive to our deepest
values. Thus even though the decision to put the thesis online was
Omar’s, we have no choice but to back him. That would hold even if we
did not agree with the material! Accordingly I have authorised the
thesis to be issued as a Computer Laboratory Technical Report. This
will make it easier for people to find and to cite, and will ensure that
its presence on our web site is permanent."
cambridge, takedown Slashdot, Digg, Del.icio.us, Newsfeeder, Reddit, StumbleUpon, TwitterTagsShareFriday January 07, 2011 |
|
|
Wednesday January 05, 2011 |
The UK Cards Assocation, a leading association representing the bank
card industry, has written
to Cambridge University to demand that it take down the web version of
a
research
paper by a graduate student. The paper identifies security
holes in one bank card products. The association argues the
disclosure "oversteps the boundaries of what constitutes responsible
disclosure." A blog post on the paper can be found here.
cambridge, security, takedown Slashdot, Digg, Del.icio.us, Newsfeeder, Reddit, StumbleUpon, TwitterTagsShareWednesday January 05, 2011 |
|
|