The Math Behind Copyright Math
March 21, 2012
Tags: copyright math
Share this post
6 Comments
Law Bytes
Episode 199: Boris Bytensky on the Criminal Code Reforms in the Online Harms Act
byMichael Geist
April 15, 2024
Michael Geist
April 8, 2024
Michael Geist
March 25, 2024
Michael Geist
March 18, 2024
Michael Geist
March 11, 2024
Michael Geist
Search Results placeholder
Recent Posts
- Debating the Online Harms Act: Insights from Two Recent Panels on Bill C-63
- The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 199: Boris Bytensky on the Criminal Code Reforms in the Online Harms Act
- AI Spending is Not an AI Strategy: Why the Government’s Artificial Intelligence Plan Avoids the Hard Governance Questions
- The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 198: Richard Moon on the Return of the Section 13 Hate Speech Provision in the Online Harms Act
- Tweets Are Not Enough: Why Combatting Relentless Antisemitism in Canada Requires Real Leadership and Action
Bad Link
The link to the file under “further details” doesn’t work.
Bad Link
It looks like he may have copied a local link from his computer into the URL text. The real link is at the end if you look at the URL:
http://blog.ted.com/2012/03/20/the-numbers-behind-the-copyright-math/
Hmm…
Hmm. It looks like the comments truncate links without making them clickable? I’ll try again with the long version and a short URL…
http://blog.ted.com/2012/03/20/the-numbers-behind-the-copyright-math/
http://ow.ly/9MYOy
I think the other $50 billion is the loss from resales. For some reason the music industry expects that customers will repurchase their music for new format…and for each device they own.
so if you have a computer + digitial music player + digital music player built into your car=3x the numbers of sales.
oh yeah and they expected to be able to force the sale to be an album instead of the 1-2 good songs off the album
Love it!
The impending doom of a big music industry frying in its own fat a boon to the oppressed!
http://www.cbc.ca/news/arts/story/2012/03/23/f-canadian-rock-revival.html