<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.michaelgeist.ca/wp-content/plugins/seriously-simple-podcasting/templates/feed-stylesheet.xsl"?><rss version="2.0"
	 xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	 xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	 xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	 xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	 xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	 xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	 xmlns:googleplay="http://www.google.com/schemas/play-podcasts/1.0"
	 xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	>
		<channel>
		<title>Law Bytes</title>
		<atom:link href="https://www.michaelgeist.ca/feed/podcast/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		<link>https://www.michaelgeist.ca/</link>
		<description>In recent years the intersection between law, technology, and policy has exploded as digital policy has become a mainstream concern in Canada and around the world. This podcast explores digital policies in conversations with people studying the legal and policy challenges, set the rules, or are experts in the field. It provides a Canadian perspective, but since the internet is global, examining international developments and Canada’s role in shaping global digital policy is be an important part of the story.

Lawbytes is hosted by Michael Geist, a law professor at the University of Ottawa, where he holds the Canada Research Chair in Internet and E-commerce Law and where he is a member of the Centre for Law, Technology and Society.</description>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 12:00:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<copyright>Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International</copyright>
		<itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:author>Michael Geist</itunes:author>
		<itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
		<itunes:summary>In recent years the intersection between law, technology, and policy has exploded as digital policy has become a mainstream concern in Canada and around the world. This podcast explores digital policies in conversations with people studying the legal and policy challenges, set the rules, or are experts in the field. It provides a Canadian perspective, but since the internet is global, examining international developments and Canada’s role in shaping global digital policy is be an important part of the story.

Lawbytes is hosted by Michael Geist, a law professor at the University of Ottawa, where he holds the Canada Research Chair in Internet and E-commerce Law and where he is a member of the Centre for Law, Technology and Society.</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:owner>
			<itunes:name>Michael Geist</itunes:name>
			<itunes:email>mgeist@pobox.com</itunes:email>
		</itunes:owner>
		<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:category text="Technology">
		</itunes:category>
		<podcast:locked owner="mgeist@pobox.com">yes</podcast:locked>
		<podcast:guid>d8ab6d8e-7cf9-572c-9a2c-ae69ac67f1cc</podcast:guid>
		
		<!-- podcast_generator="SSP by Castos/2.16.2" Seriously Simple Podcasting plugin for WordPress (https://wordpress.org/plugins/seriously-simple-podcasting/) -->
		<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.0.11</generator>
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">70762648</site>
<item>
	<title>Episode 261: Ian Goldberg on the Privacy Risks of Age Assurance Technologies</title>
	<link>https://www.michaelgeist.ca/podcast/episode-261-ian-goldberg-on-the-privacy-risks-of-age-assurance-technologies/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=episode-261-ian-goldberg-on-the-privacy-risks-of-age-assurance-technologies</link>
	<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2026 10:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Geist]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.michaelgeist.ca/?post_type=podcast&#038;p=21416</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[Age verification, estimation or inference is seemingly all the rage right now. Vendors are promoting it as the solution to thorny challenges to limit access to certain sites and services and politicians are eager to legislate in that direction, including in Canada with Bill S-209. Hundreds of scientists and technology experts from around the world have taken note of the trend and come together to issue a public letter warning about the privacy, safety and discrimination risks associated with these technologies. Ian Goldberg, who holds the Canada Research Chair in Privacy Enhancing Technologies at the University of Waterloo, was one of the signatories. Ian has long been engaged at the intersection between technology and privacy and joins the Law Bytes podcast to discuss the age assurance technologies, how privacy enhancing technologies could address some of the concerns, and the risks with current legislative approaches.]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[Age verification, estimation or inference is seemingly all the rage right now. Vendors are promoting it as the solution to thorny challenges to limit access to certain sites and services and politicians are eager to legislate in that direction, including]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[Age verification, estimation or inference is seemingly all the rage right now. Vendors are promoting it as the solution to thorny challenges to limit access to certain sites and services and politicians are eager to legislate in that direction, including in Canada with Bill S-209. Hundreds of scientists and technology experts from around the world have taken note of the trend and come together to issue a public letter warning about the privacy, safety and discrimination risks associated with these technologies. Ian Goldberg, who holds the Canada Research Chair in Privacy Enhancing Technologies at the University of Waterloo, was one of the signatories. Ian has long been engaged at the intersection between technology and privacy and joins the Law Bytes podcast to discuss the age assurance technologies, how privacy enhancing technologies could address some of the concerns, and the risks with current legislative approaches.]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://chtbl.com/track/ED9CFB/www.michaelgeist.ca/podcast-download/21416/episode-261-ian-goldberg-on-the-privacy-risks-of-age-assurance-technologies.mp3" length="26914745" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[Age verification, estimation or inference is seemingly all the rage right now. Vendors are promoting it as the solution to thorny challenges to limit access to certain sites and services and politicians are eager to legislate in that direction, including in Canada with Bill S-209. Hundreds of scientists and technology experts from around the world have taken note of the trend and come together to issue a public letter warning about the privacy, safety and discrimination risks associated with these technologies. Ian Goldberg, who holds the Canada Research Chair in Privacy Enhancing Technologies at the University of Waterloo, was one of the signatories. Ian has long been engaged at the intersection between technology and privacy and joins the Law Bytes podcast to discuss the age assurance technologies, how privacy enhancing technologies could address some of the concerns, and the risks with current legislative approaches.]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>00:32:03</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[Michael Geist]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[Age verification, estimation or inference is seemingly all the rage right now. Vendors are promoting it as the solution to thorny challenges to limit access to certain sites and services and politicians are eager to legislate in that direction, including in Canada with Bill S-209. Hundreds of scientists and technology experts from around the world have taken note of the trend and come together to issue a public letter warning about the privacy, safety and discrimination risks associated with these technologies. Ian Goldberg, who holds the Canada Research Chair in Privacy Enhancing Technologies at the University of Waterloo, was one of the signatories. Ian has long been engaged at the intersection between technology and privacy and joins the Law Bytes podcast to discuss the age assurance technologies, how privacy enhancing technologies could address some of the concerns, and the risks with current legislative approaches.]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Episode 260: What the Government Didn’t Want You To Hear About Bill C-4 And Its Weak Political Party Privacy Rules</title>
	<link>https://www.michaelgeist.ca/podcast/episode-260-what-the-government-didnt-want-you-to-hear-about-how-bill-c-4-undermines-political-party-privacy-rules/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=episode-260-what-the-government-didnt-want-you-to-hear-about-how-bill-c-4-undermines-political-party-privacy-rules</link>
	<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2026 10:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Geist]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.michaelgeist.ca/?post_type=podcast&#038;p=21382</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[Last spring, the government quietly inserted provisions that exempt political parties from the application of privacy protections in Bill C-4, an “affordability measures” bill. The government barely acknowledged the provision in its the study of the bill at the House of Commons and refused to even hear witnesses on the issue. The Senate didn’t play along however. It conducted hearings on the privacy rules and the Senators didn’t like what they heard, amending the bill by including a sunset clause on the privacy provisions that gives that the government three years to come up with something better. The bill heads back to the House of Commons, where the government can either accept the change and have the bill pass or reject the change and send it back again to the Senate. This Law Bytes podcast episode tells the story of what the Senate heard on Bill C-4. It is what the government did not want Canadians to hear and would prefer to ignore altogether. There were witnesses from advocacy groups, but the episode focuses on testimony from privacy commissioners (current and former) along with Elections Canada leadership.]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[Last spring, the government quietly inserted provisions that exempt political parties from the application of privacy protections in Bill C-4, an “affordability measures” bill. The government barely acknowledged the provision in its the study of the bill]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[Last spring, the government quietly inserted provisions that exempt political parties from the application of privacy protections in Bill C-4, an “affordability measures” bill. The government barely acknowledged the provision in its the study of the bill at the House of Commons and refused to even hear witnesses on the issue. The Senate didn’t play along however. It conducted hearings on the privacy rules and the Senators didn’t like what they heard, amending the bill by including a sunset clause on the privacy provisions that gives that the government three years to come up with something better. The bill heads back to the House of Commons, where the government can either accept the change and have the bill pass or reject the change and send it back again to the Senate. This Law Bytes podcast episode tells the story of what the Senate heard on Bill C-4. It is what the government did not want Canadians to hear and would prefer to ignore altogether. There were witnesses from advocacy groups, but the episode focuses on testimony from privacy commissioners (current and former) along with Elections Canada leadership.]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://chtbl.com/track/ED9CFB/www.michaelgeist.ca/podcast-download/21382/episode-260-what-the-government-didnt-want-you-to-hear-about-how-bill-c-4-undermines-political-party-privacy-rules.mp3" length="37015121" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[Last spring, the government quietly inserted provisions that exempt political parties from the application of privacy protections in Bill C-4, an “affordability measures” bill. The government barely acknowledged the provision in its the study of the bill at the House of Commons and refused to even hear witnesses on the issue. The Senate didn’t play along however. It conducted hearings on the privacy rules and the Senators didn’t like what they heard, amending the bill by including a sunset clause on the privacy provisions that gives that the government three years to come up with something better. The bill heads back to the House of Commons, where the government can either accept the change and have the bill pass or reject the change and send it back again to the Senate. This Law Bytes podcast episode tells the story of what the Senate heard on Bill C-4. It is what the government did not want Canadians to hear and would prefer to ignore altogether. There were witnesses from advocacy groups, but the episode focuses on testimony from privacy commissioners (current and former) along with Elections Canada leadership.]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>00:44:44</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[Michael Geist]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[Last spring, the government quietly inserted provisions that exempt political parties from the application of privacy protections in Bill C-4, an “affordability measures” bill. The government barely acknowledged the provision in its the study of the bill at the House of Commons and refused to even hear witnesses on the issue. The Senate didn’t play along however. It conducted hearings on the privacy rules and the Senators didn’t like what they heard, amending the bill by including a sunset clause on the privacy provisions that gives that the government three years to come up with something better. The bill heads back to the House of Commons, where the government can either accept the change and have the bill pass or reject the change and send it back again to the Senate. This Law Bytes podcast episode tells the story of what the Senate heard on Bill C-4. It is what the government did not want Canadians to hear and would prefer to ignore altogether. There were witnesses from advocacy g]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Episode 258: Jaxson Khan With an Insider Perspective on AI Policy Development in Canada</title>
	<link>https://www.michaelgeist.ca/podcast/episode-258-jaxson-khan-with-an-insider-perspective-on-ai-policy-development-in-canada/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=episode-258-jaxson-khan-with-an-insider-perspective-on-ai-policy-development-in-canada</link>
	<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2026 11:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Geist]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.michaelgeist.ca/?post_type=podcast&#038;p=21354</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 258: Jaxson Khan With an Insider Perspective on AI Policy Development in Canada

Earlier this month, the government quietly released a “what we heard” report this discussing the response to its 30-day sprint AI consultation from last October. The consultation was promoted as giving Canadians – including a 28 person expert advisory board – the chance to provide their views on AI as the AI Minister Evan Solomon works toward a national AI strategy. The consultation garnered some criticism for its speed and missing perspectives on the expert panel.  More recently on the use of AI to assess the results have sparked further doubts about it.

Jaxson Khan is the CEO and Founder of Aperature AI and a Senior Fellow at the Munk School of Global Affairs and Public Policy at the University of Toronto. But before that, he served as Senior Policy Advisor the Minister of Innovation Science and Industry, where AI was one of his lead responsibilities. Jaxson joins the Law Bytes podcast to provide an insider perspective on AI policy development along with his thoughts on the AI consultation and its results.

&nbsp;]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 258: Jaxson Khan With an Insider Perspective on AI Policy Development in Canada

Earlier this month, the government quietly released a “what we heard” report this discussing the response to its 30-day sprint AI consultati]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 258: Jaxson Khan With an Insider Perspective on AI Policy Development in Canada

Earlier this month, the government quietly released a “what we heard” report this discussing the response to its 30-day sprint AI consultation from last October. The consultation was promoted as giving Canadians – including a 28 person expert advisory board – the chance to provide their views on AI as the AI Minister Evan Solomon works toward a national AI strategy. The consultation garnered some criticism for its speed and missing perspectives on the expert panel.  More recently on the use of AI to assess the results have sparked further doubts about it.

Jaxson Khan is the CEO and Founder of Aperature AI and a Senior Fellow at the Munk School of Global Affairs and Public Policy at the University of Toronto. But before that, he served as Senior Policy Advisor the Minister of Innovation Science and Industry, where AI was one of his lead responsibilities. Jaxson joins the Law Bytes podcast to provide an insider perspective on AI policy development along with his thoughts on the AI consultation and its results.

&nbsp;]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://chtbl.com/track/ED9CFB/www.michaelgeist.ca/podcast-download/21354/episode-258-jaxson-khan-with-an-insider-perspective-on-ai-policy-development-in-canada.mp3" length="30075565" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 258: Jaxson Khan With an Insider Perspective on AI Policy Development in Canada

Earlier this month, the government quietly released a “what we heard” report this discussing the response to its 30-day sprint AI consultation from last October. The consultation was promoted as giving Canadians – including a 28 person expert advisory board – the chance to provide their views on AI as the AI Minister Evan Solomon works toward a national AI strategy. The consultation garnered some criticism for its speed and missing perspectives on the expert panel.  More recently on the use of AI to assess the results have sparked further doubts about it.

Jaxson Khan is the CEO and Founder of Aperature AI and a Senior Fellow at the Munk School of Global Affairs and Public Policy at the University of Toronto. But before that, he served as Senior Policy Advisor the Minister of Innovation Science and Industry, where AI was one of his lead responsibilities. Jaxson joins the Law Bytes podcast to provide an insider perspective on AI policy development along with his thoughts on the AI consultation and its results.

&nbsp;]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>00:38:09</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[Michael Geist]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 258: Jaxson Khan With an Insider Perspective on AI Policy Development in Canada

Earlier this month, the government quietly released a “what we heard” report this discussing the response to its 30-day sprint AI consultation from last October. The consultation was promoted as giving Canadians – including a 28 person expert advisory board – the chance to provide their views on AI as the AI Minister Evan Solomon works toward a national AI strategy. The consultation garnered some criticism for its speed and missing perspectives on the expert panel.  More recently on the use of AI to assess the results have sparked further doubts about it.

Jaxson Khan is the CEO and Founder of Aperature AI and a Senior Fellow at the Munk School of Global Affairs and Public Policy at the University of Toronto. But before that, he served as Senior Policy Advisor the Minister of Innovation Science and Industry, where AI was one of his lead responsibilities. Jaxson joins the]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Episode 257: Lisa Given on What Canada Can Learn From Australia’s Youth Social Media Ban</title>
	<link>https://www.michaelgeist.ca/podcast/episode-257-lisa-given-on-what-canada-can-learn-from-australias-youth-social-media-ban/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=episode-257-lisa-given-on-what-canada-can-learn-from-australias-youth-social-media-ban</link>
	<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2026 11:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Geist]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.michaelgeist.ca/?post_type=podcast&#038;p=21344</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[Social media bans for younger users have begun to take hold in various countries, particularly in Europe. In Canada, Bill S-209 may ostensibly be about underage access to pornography sites, but the bill’s proponents seem positively giddy at the prospect of a broader application to social media. This trend started in Australia, which passed a social media ban for those under 16 in late 2024 with the law taking effect just a couple of months ago.
Lisa Given is the Distinguished Professor of Information Sciences at the Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology or RMIT in Melbourne, Australia. She has been closely tracking and commenting on the Australian legislation and she joins the Law Bytes podcast to discuss its origins, how the law functions, the concerns it has raised, and what lessons Canada might draw from the experience to date.]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[Social media bans for younger users have begun to take hold in various countries, particularly in Europe. In Canada, Bill S-209 may ostensibly be about underage access to pornography sites, but the bill’s proponents seem positively giddy at the prospect ]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[Social media bans for younger users have begun to take hold in various countries, particularly in Europe. In Canada, Bill S-209 may ostensibly be about underage access to pornography sites, but the bill’s proponents seem positively giddy at the prospect of a broader application to social media. This trend started in Australia, which passed a social media ban for those under 16 in late 2024 with the law taking effect just a couple of months ago.
Lisa Given is the Distinguished Professor of Information Sciences at the Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology or RMIT in Melbourne, Australia. She has been closely tracking and commenting on the Australian legislation and she joins the Law Bytes podcast to discuss its origins, how the law functions, the concerns it has raised, and what lessons Canada might draw from the experience to date.]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://chtbl.com/track/ED9CFB/www.michaelgeist.ca/podcast-download/21344/episode-257-lisa-given-on-what-canada-can-learn-from-australias-youth-social-media-ban.mp3" length="25377881" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[Social media bans for younger users have begun to take hold in various countries, particularly in Europe. In Canada, Bill S-209 may ostensibly be about underage access to pornography sites, but the bill’s proponents seem positively giddy at the prospect of a broader application to social media. This trend started in Australia, which passed a social media ban for those under 16 in late 2024 with the law taking effect just a couple of months ago.
Lisa Given is the Distinguished Professor of Information Sciences at the Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology or RMIT in Melbourne, Australia. She has been closely tracking and commenting on the Australian legislation and she joins the Law Bytes podcast to discuss its origins, how the law functions, the concerns it has raised, and what lessons Canada might draw from the experience to date.]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>00:32:30</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[Michael Geist]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[Social media bans for younger users have begun to take hold in various countries, particularly in Europe. In Canada, Bill S-209 may ostensibly be about underage access to pornography sites, but the bill’s proponents seem positively giddy at the prospect of a broader application to social media. This trend started in Australia, which passed a social media ban for those under 16 in late 2024 with the law taking effect just a couple of months ago.
Lisa Given is the Distinguished Professor of Information Sciences at the Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology or RMIT in Melbourne, Australia. She has been closely tracking and commenting on the Australian legislation and she joins the Law Bytes podcast to discuss its origins, how the law functions, the concerns it has raised, and what lessons Canada might draw from the experience to date.]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 255: Grappling with Grok &#8211; Heidi Tworek on the Limits of Canadian Law</title>
	<link>https://www.michaelgeist.ca/podcast/the-law-bytes-podcast-episode-255-grappling-with-grok-heidi-tworek-on-the-limits-of-canadian-law/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-law-bytes-podcast-episode-255-grappling-with-grok-heidi-tworek-on-the-limits-of-canadian-law</link>
	<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2026 11:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Geist]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.michaelgeist.ca/?post_type=podcast&#038;p=21306</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[The Law Bytes podcast is back, starting with an episode on the limits of Canadian law in addressing the concerns associated with Grok AI, the AI chatbot that garnered global attention over the widespread creation and distribution of AI-generated sexualized deep fakes. Weaving together online harms, privacy, AI regulation, and platform regulation into a single issue, there have been service bans in some countries but Canada has thus far struggled to respond.
To help understand what has taken place and Canada’s law and policy options, Professor Heidi Tworek returns to the Law Bytes podcast. Professor Tworek is the Canada Research Chair and Professor of History and Public Policy at the University of British Columbia, where she also directs the Centre for the Study of Democratic Institutions. Her work explores how new communications technologies affect democracy in the past and present and she served on the government’s online harms advisory board.]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[The Law Bytes podcast is back, starting with an episode on the limits of Canadian law in addressing the concerns associated with Grok AI, the AI chatbot that garnered global attention over the widespread creation and distribution of AI-generated sexualiz]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[The Law Bytes podcast is back, starting with an episode on the limits of Canadian law in addressing the concerns associated with Grok AI, the AI chatbot that garnered global attention over the widespread creation and distribution of AI-generated sexualized deep fakes. Weaving together online harms, privacy, AI regulation, and platform regulation into a single issue, there have been service bans in some countries but Canada has thus far struggled to respond.
To help understand what has taken place and Canada’s law and policy options, Professor Heidi Tworek returns to the Law Bytes podcast. Professor Tworek is the Canada Research Chair and Professor of History and Public Policy at the University of British Columbia, where she also directs the Centre for the Study of Democratic Institutions. Her work explores how new communications technologies affect democracy in the past and present and she served on the government’s online harms advisory board.]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://chtbl.com/track/ED9CFB/www.michaelgeist.ca/podcast-download/21306/the-law-bytes-podcast-episode-255-grappling-with-grok-heidi-tworek-on-the-limits-of-canadian-law.mp3" length="24248393" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Law Bytes podcast is back, starting with an episode on the limits of Canadian law in addressing the concerns associated with Grok AI, the AI chatbot that garnered global attention over the widespread creation and distribution of AI-generated sexualized deep fakes. Weaving together online harms, privacy, AI regulation, and platform regulation into a single issue, there have been service bans in some countries but Canada has thus far struggled to respond.
To help understand what has taken place and Canada’s law and policy options, Professor Heidi Tworek returns to the Law Bytes podcast. Professor Tworek is the Canada Research Chair and Professor of History and Public Policy at the University of British Columbia, where she also directs the Centre for the Study of Democratic Institutions. Her work explores how new communications technologies affect democracy in the past and present and she served on the government’s online harms advisory board.]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>00:29:57</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[Michael Geist]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[The Law Bytes podcast is back, starting with an episode on the limits of Canadian law in addressing the concerns associated with Grok AI, the AI chatbot that garnered global attention over the widespread creation and distribution of AI-generated sexualized deep fakes. Weaving together online harms, privacy, AI regulation, and platform regulation into a single issue, there have been service bans in some countries but Canada has thus far struggled to respond.
To help understand what has taken place and Canada’s law and policy options, Professor Heidi Tworek returns to the Law Bytes podcast. Professor Tworek is the Canada Research Chair and Professor of History and Public Policy at the University of British Columbia, where she also directs the Centre for the Study of Democratic Institutions. Her work explores how new communications technologies affect democracy in the past and present and she served on the government’s online harms advisory board.]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Episode 253: Guy Rub on the Unconvincing Case for a New Canadian Artists&#8217; Resale Right</title>
	<link>https://www.michaelgeist.ca/podcast/episode-253-guy-rub-on-the-unconvincing-case-for-a-new-canadian-artist-resale-right/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=episode-253-guy-rub-on-the-unconvincing-case-for-a-new-canadian-artist-resale-right</link>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2025 11:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Geist]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.michaelgeist.ca/?post_type=podcast&#038;p=21255</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[The creation of an Artists' Resale Right has been adopted in many countries to at best mixed reviews. They’re unsurprisingly widely supported by potential beneficiaries, but the data on who actually benefits raises real questions about the wisdom of the policy. Canada may be headed in the same policy direction as the government recently announced in its budget plans to introduce the measure. Professor Guy Rub is the Vincent J. Marella Professor of Law at Temple University’s Beasley School of Law and an expert in the intersection between intellectual property law, commercial law, the arts, and economic theory. Professor Rub has written critically about the Artists' Resale Right including as part of a submission to a House of Commons committee that studied the issue several years ago. He joins the Law Bytes podcast to discuss the policy measure and its drawbacks, including his view that it primarily benefits artists who are wealthy, old, or dead.]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[The creation of an Artists Resale Right has been adopted in many countries to at best mixed reviews. They’re unsurprisingly widely supported by potential beneficiaries, but the data on who actually benefits raises real questions about the wisdom of the p]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[The creation of an Artists' Resale Right has been adopted in many countries to at best mixed reviews. They’re unsurprisingly widely supported by potential beneficiaries, but the data on who actually benefits raises real questions about the wisdom of the policy. Canada may be headed in the same policy direction as the government recently announced in its budget plans to introduce the measure. Professor Guy Rub is the Vincent J. Marella Professor of Law at Temple University’s Beasley School of Law and an expert in the intersection between intellectual property law, commercial law, the arts, and economic theory. Professor Rub has written critically about the Artists' Resale Right including as part of a submission to a House of Commons committee that studied the issue several years ago. He joins the Law Bytes podcast to discuss the policy measure and its drawbacks, including his view that it primarily benefits artists who are wealthy, old, or dead.]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://chtbl.com/track/ED9CFB/www.michaelgeist.ca/podcast-download/21255/episode-253-guy-rub-on-the-unconvincing-case-for-a-new-canadian-artist-resale-right.mp3" length="26920721" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[The creation of an Artists' Resale Right has been adopted in many countries to at best mixed reviews. They’re unsurprisingly widely supported by potential beneficiaries, but the data on who actually benefits raises real questions about the wisdom of the policy. Canada may be headed in the same policy direction as the government recently announced in its budget plans to introduce the measure. Professor Guy Rub is the Vincent J. Marella Professor of Law at Temple University’s Beasley School of Law and an expert in the intersection between intellectual property law, commercial law, the arts, and economic theory. Professor Rub has written critically about the Artists' Resale Right including as part of a submission to a House of Commons committee that studied the issue several years ago. He joins the Law Bytes podcast to discuss the policy measure and its drawbacks, including his view that it primarily benefits artists who are wealthy, old, or dead.]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>00:35:59</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[Michael Geist]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[The creation of an Artists' Resale Right has been adopted in many countries to at best mixed reviews. They’re unsurprisingly widely supported by potential beneficiaries, but the data on who actually benefits raises real questions about the wisdom of the policy. Canada may be headed in the same policy direction as the government recently announced in its budget plans to introduce the measure. Professor Guy Rub is the Vincent J. Marella Professor of Law at Temple University’s Beasley School of Law and an expert in the intersection between intellectual property law, commercial law, the arts, and economic theory. Professor Rub has written critically about the Artists' Resale Right including as part of a submission to a House of Commons committee that studied the issue several years ago. He joins the Law Bytes podcast to discuss the policy measure and its drawbacks, including his view that it primarily benefits artists who are wealthy, old, or dead.]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Episode 252: Len St-Aubin on the CRTC’s Plan To Modernize Canadian Content Rules</title>
	<link>https://www.michaelgeist.ca/podcast/episode-252-len-st-aubin-on-the-crtcs-plan-to-modernize-canadian-content-rules/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=episode-252-len-st-aubin-on-the-crtcs-plan-to-modernize-canadian-content-rules</link>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2025 11:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Geist]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.michaelgeist.ca/?post_type=podcast&#038;p=21238</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[The CRTC recently released its much anticipated decision on Canadian content rules, the first of two decisions that could reshape broadcasting and film/TV production in Canada. The Commission promoted its Cancon approach as offering new flexibility into the system but the fine print matters as some changes may be more restrictive than they appear at first glance. To help make sense of the decision, Len St-Aubin, the former Director General of Telecommunications Policy at Industry Canada, joins the Law Bytes podcast. Len provided consulting services to Netflix until 2020 and has since been an active participant in the debate on Internet policy as part of the Canadian Internet Society.]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[The CRTC recently released its much anticipated decision on Canadian content rules, the first of two decisions that could reshape broadcasting and film/TV production in Canada. The Commission promoted its Cancon approach as offering new flexibility into ]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[The CRTC recently released its much anticipated decision on Canadian content rules, the first of two decisions that could reshape broadcasting and film/TV production in Canada. The Commission promoted its Cancon approach as offering new flexibility into the system but the fine print matters as some changes may be more restrictive than they appear at first glance. To help make sense of the decision, Len St-Aubin, the former Director General of Telecommunications Policy at Industry Canada, joins the Law Bytes podcast. Len provided consulting services to Netflix until 2020 and has since been an active participant in the debate on Internet policy as part of the Canadian Internet Society.]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://chtbl.com/track/ED9CFB/www.michaelgeist.ca/podcast-download/21238/episode-252-len-st-aubin-on-the-crtcs-plan-to-modernize-canadian-content-rules.mp3" length="33971033" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[The CRTC recently released its much anticipated decision on Canadian content rules, the first of two decisions that could reshape broadcasting and film/TV production in Canada. The Commission promoted its Cancon approach as offering new flexibility into the system but the fine print matters as some changes may be more restrictive than they appear at first glance. To help make sense of the decision, Len St-Aubin, the former Director General of Telecommunications Policy at Industry Canada, joins the Law Bytes podcast. Len provided consulting services to Netflix until 2020 and has since been an active participant in the debate on Internet policy as part of the Canadian Internet Society.]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>00:41:20</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[Michael Geist]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[The CRTC recently released its much anticipated decision on Canadian content rules, the first of two decisions that could reshape broadcasting and film/TV production in Canada. The Commission promoted its Cancon approach as offering new flexibility into the system but the fine print matters as some changes may be more restrictive than they appear at first glance. To help make sense of the decision, Len St-Aubin, the former Director General of Telecommunications Policy at Industry Canada, joins the Law Bytes podcast. Len provided consulting services to Netflix until 2020 and has since been an active participant in the debate on Internet policy as part of the Canadian Internet Society.]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Episode 251: Jennifer Pybus on the Debate Over Canadian Digital Sovereignty</title>
	<link>https://www.michaelgeist.ca/podcast/ep-251-jennifer-pybus-on-the-canadian-digital-sovereignty-debate/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=ep-251-jennifer-pybus-on-the-canadian-digital-sovereignty-debate</link>
	<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2025 11:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Geist]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.michaelgeist.ca/?post_type=podcast&#038;p=21230</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[Digital sovereignty is hot the digital policy phrase of the moment driving discussion on Canadian digital policy involving AI, digital infrastructure, privacy, and cultural policy among others. Yet despite its widespread use, its meaning remains opaque as it often used to frame – or reframe – longstanding policy positions. The government has begun to flesh out the issue with Treasury Board recently releasing a white paper on digital sovereignty that provides a useful starting point for discussion. Jennifer Pybus, the Canada Research Chair in Data, Democracy and AI at York University joins the Law Bytes podcast to discuss the white paper and Canada’s digital sovereignty debate.]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[Digital sovereignty is hot the digital policy phrase of the moment driving discussion on Canadian digital policy involving AI, digital infrastructure, privacy, and cultural policy among others. Yet despite its widespread use, its meaning remains opaque a]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[Digital sovereignty is hot the digital policy phrase of the moment driving discussion on Canadian digital policy involving AI, digital infrastructure, privacy, and cultural policy among others. Yet despite its widespread use, its meaning remains opaque as it often used to frame – or reframe – longstanding policy positions. The government has begun to flesh out the issue with Treasury Board recently releasing a white paper on digital sovereignty that provides a useful starting point for discussion. Jennifer Pybus, the Canada Research Chair in Data, Democracy and AI at York University joins the Law Bytes podcast to discuss the white paper and Canada’s digital sovereignty debate.]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://chtbl.com/track/ED9CFB/www.michaelgeist.ca/podcast-download/21230/ep-251-jennifer-pybus-on-the-canadian-digital-sovereignty-debate.mp3" length="32516285" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[Digital sovereignty is hot the digital policy phrase of the moment driving discussion on Canadian digital policy involving AI, digital infrastructure, privacy, and cultural policy among others. Yet despite its widespread use, its meaning remains opaque as it often used to frame – or reframe – longstanding policy positions. The government has begun to flesh out the issue with Treasury Board recently releasing a white paper on digital sovereignty that provides a useful starting point for discussion. Jennifer Pybus, the Canada Research Chair in Data, Democracy and AI at York University joins the Law Bytes podcast to discuss the white paper and Canada’s digital sovereignty debate.]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>00:37:58</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[Michael Geist]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[Digital sovereignty is hot the digital policy phrase of the moment driving discussion on Canadian digital policy involving AI, digital infrastructure, privacy, and cultural policy among others. Yet despite its widespread use, its meaning remains opaque as it often used to frame – or reframe – longstanding policy positions. The government has begun to flesh out the issue with Treasury Board recently releasing a white paper on digital sovereignty that provides a useful starting point for discussion. Jennifer Pybus, the Canada Research Chair in Data, Democracy and AI at York University joins the Law Bytes podcast to discuss the white paper and Canada’s digital sovereignty debate.]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Episode 247: My Senate Appearance on the Bill That Could Lead to Canada-Wide Blocking of X, Reddit and ChatGPT</title>
	<link>https://www.michaelgeist.ca/podcast/episode-247-my-senate-appearance-on-the-bill-that-could-lead-to-canada-wide-blocking-of-x-reddit-and-chatgpt/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=episode-247-my-senate-appearance-on-the-bill-that-could-lead-to-canada-wide-blocking-of-x-reddit-and-chatgpt</link>
	<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2025 10:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Geist]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.michaelgeist.ca/?post_type=podcast&#038;p=21184</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[Bill S-209, the legislative effort to establish age verification requirements for sites and services that are said to facilitate access to pornography, is back. The bill has some modest improvements from the earlier S-210, but the core concerns – overbroad scope that lumps in social media companies, Internet providers, and AI services with pornography sites, the privacy and equity implications of mandated age verification, and the use of nationwide website blocking – remain. Last week, I appeared before the Standing Senate Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs where I identified many of the concerns with the bill and engaged in a detailed discussion with multiple senators. This week’s Law Bytes podcast goes inside the hearing room for my opening statement and the Q&amp;A with Senators that followed.]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[Bill S-209, the legislative effort to establish age verification requirements for sites and services that are said to facilitate access to pornography, is back. The bill has some modest improvements from the earlier S-210, but the core concerns – overbro]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[Bill S-209, the legislative effort to establish age verification requirements for sites and services that are said to facilitate access to pornography, is back. The bill has some modest improvements from the earlier S-210, but the core concerns – overbroad scope that lumps in social media companies, Internet providers, and AI services with pornography sites, the privacy and equity implications of mandated age verification, and the use of nationwide website blocking – remain. Last week, I appeared before the Standing Senate Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs where I identified many of the concerns with the bill and engaged in a detailed discussion with multiple senators. This week’s Law Bytes podcast goes inside the hearing room for my opening statement and the Q&amp;A with Senators that followed.]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://chtbl.com/track/ED9CFB/www.michaelgeist.ca/podcast-download/21184/episode-247-my-senate-appearance-on-the-bill-that-could-lead-to-canada-wide-blocking-of-x-reddit-and-chatgpt.mp3" length="29512593" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[Bill S-209, the legislative effort to establish age verification requirements for sites and services that are said to facilitate access to pornography, is back. The bill has some modest improvements from the earlier S-210, but the core concerns – overbroad scope that lumps in social media companies, Internet providers, and AI services with pornography sites, the privacy and equity implications of mandated age verification, and the use of nationwide website blocking – remain. Last week, I appeared before the Standing Senate Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs where I identified many of the concerns with the bill and engaged in a detailed discussion with multiple senators. This week’s Law Bytes podcast goes inside the hearing room for my opening statement and the Q&amp;A with Senators that followed.]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>00:35:32</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[Michael Geist]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[Bill S-209, the legislative effort to establish age verification requirements for sites and services that are said to facilitate access to pornography, is back. The bill has some modest improvements from the earlier S-210, but the core concerns – overbroad scope that lumps in social media companies, Internet providers, and AI services with pornography sites, the privacy and equity implications of mandated age verification, and the use of nationwide website blocking – remain. Last week, I appeared before the Standing Senate Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs where I identified many of the concerns with the bill and engaged in a detailed discussion with multiple senators. This week’s Law Bytes podcast goes inside the hearing room for my opening statement and the Q&amp;A with Senators that followed.]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Episode 245: Kate Robertson on Bill C-2’s Cross-Border Data Sharing Privacy Risks</title>
	<link>https://www.michaelgeist.ca/podcast/episode-245-kate-robertson-on-bill-c-2s-cross-border-data-sharing-privacy-risks/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=episode-245-kate-robertson-on-bill-c-2s-cross-border-data-sharing-privacy-risks</link>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2025 10:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Geist]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.michaelgeist.ca/?post_type=podcast&#038;p=21154</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[Bill C-2, the government’s proposed lawful access legislation, has been the subject of several prior episodes covering warrantless disclosure of information as part of the new information demand power in Part 14 of the bill as well as some of the surveillance technology capabilities found in Part 15. Those remain major issues, but there is another element of the bill that deserves greater attention, particularly at this moment when the Canada – US relationship is increasingly fraught.  That issue involves mandated data sharing with implications for Canada’s international treaty obligations under the “Second Additional Protocol” to the Budapest Convention as well as the US Cloud Act. Kate Robertson, a lawyer and senior research associate at the Citizen Lab in the Munk School at the University of Toronto, wrote an extensive brief on these issues soon after the bill was introduced. She joins the Law Bytes podcast to talk about a critical Bill C-2 issue that has thus far attracted limited attention.]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[Bill C-2, the government’s proposed lawful access legislation, has been the subject of several prior episodes covering warrantless disclosure of information as part of the new information demand power in Part 14 of the bill as well as some of the surveil]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[Bill C-2, the government’s proposed lawful access legislation, has been the subject of several prior episodes covering warrantless disclosure of information as part of the new information demand power in Part 14 of the bill as well as some of the surveillance technology capabilities found in Part 15. Those remain major issues, but there is another element of the bill that deserves greater attention, particularly at this moment when the Canada – US relationship is increasingly fraught.  That issue involves mandated data sharing with implications for Canada’s international treaty obligations under the “Second Additional Protocol” to the Budapest Convention as well as the US Cloud Act. Kate Robertson, a lawyer and senior research associate at the Citizen Lab in the Munk School at the University of Toronto, wrote an extensive brief on these issues soon after the bill was introduced. She joins the Law Bytes podcast to talk about a critical Bill C-2 issue that has thus far attracted limited attention.]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://chtbl.com/track/ED9CFB/www.michaelgeist.ca/podcast-download/21154/episode-245-kate-robertson-on-bill-c-2s-cross-border-data-sharing-privacy-risks.mp3" length="41025641" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[Bill C-2, the government’s proposed lawful access legislation, has been the subject of several prior episodes covering warrantless disclosure of information as part of the new information demand power in Part 14 of the bill as well as some of the surveillance technology capabilities found in Part 15. Those remain major issues, but there is another element of the bill that deserves greater attention, particularly at this moment when the Canada – US relationship is increasingly fraught.  That issue involves mandated data sharing with implications for Canada’s international treaty obligations under the “Second Additional Protocol” to the Budapest Convention as well as the US Cloud Act. Kate Robertson, a lawyer and senior research associate at the Citizen Lab in the Munk School at the University of Toronto, wrote an extensive brief on these issues soon after the bill was introduced. She joins the Law Bytes podcast to talk about a critical Bill C-2 issue that has thus far attracted limited attention.]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>00:50:24</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[Michael Geist]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[Bill C-2, the government’s proposed lawful access legislation, has been the subject of several prior episodes covering warrantless disclosure of information as part of the new information demand power in Part 14 of the bill as well as some of the surveillance technology capabilities found in Part 15. Those remain major issues, but there is another element of the bill that deserves greater attention, particularly at this moment when the Canada – US relationship is increasingly fraught.  That issue involves mandated data sharing with implications for Canada’s international treaty obligations under the “Second Additional Protocol” to the Budapest Convention as well as the US Cloud Act. Kate Robertson, a lawyer and senior research associate at the Citizen Lab in the Munk School at the University of Toronto, wrote an extensive brief on these issues soon after the bill was introduced. She joins the Law Bytes podcast to talk about a critical Bill C-2 issue that has thus far attracted limited]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/

Minified using disk

Served from: www.michaelgeist.ca @ 2026-04-13 23:45:04 by W3 Total Cache
-->