<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.michaelgeist.ca/wp-content/plugins/seriously-simple-podcasting/templates/feed-stylesheet.xsl"?><rss version="2.0"
	 xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	 xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	 xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	 xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	 xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	 xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	 xmlns:googleplay="http://www.google.com/schemas/play-podcasts/1.0"
	 xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	>
		<channel>
		<title>Law Bytes</title>
		<atom:link href="https://www.michaelgeist.ca/feed/podcast/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		<link>https://www.michaelgeist.ca/</link>
		<description>In recent years the intersection between law, technology, and policy has exploded as digital policy has become a mainstream concern in Canada and around the world. This podcast explores digital policies in conversations with people studying the legal and policy challenges, set the rules, or are experts in the field. It provides a Canadian perspective, but since the internet is global, examining international developments and Canada’s role in shaping global digital policy is be an important part of the story.

Lawbytes is hosted by Michael Geist, a law professor at the University of Ottawa, where he holds the Canada Research Chair in Internet and E-commerce Law and where he is a member of the Centre for Law, Technology and Society.</description>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 12:43:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<copyright>Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International</copyright>
		<itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:author>Michael Geist</itunes:author>
		<itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
		<itunes:summary>In recent years the intersection between law, technology, and policy has exploded as digital policy has become a mainstream concern in Canada and around the world. This podcast explores digital policies in conversations with people studying the legal and policy challenges, set the rules, or are experts in the field. It provides a Canadian perspective, but since the internet is global, examining international developments and Canada’s role in shaping global digital policy is be an important part of the story.

Lawbytes is hosted by Michael Geist, a law professor at the University of Ottawa, where he holds the Canada Research Chair in Internet and E-commerce Law and where he is a member of the Centre for Law, Technology and Society.</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:owner>
			<itunes:name>Michael Geist</itunes:name>
			<itunes:email>mgeist@pobox.com</itunes:email>
		</itunes:owner>
		<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:category text="Technology">
		</itunes:category>
		<podcast:locked owner="mgeist@pobox.com">yes</podcast:locked>
		<podcast:guid>d8ab6d8e-7cf9-572c-9a2c-ae69ac67f1cc</podcast:guid>
		
		<!-- podcast_generator="SSP by Castos/2.16.2" Seriously Simple Podcasting plugin for WordPress (https://wordpress.org/plugins/seriously-simple-podcasting/) -->
		<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.0.12</generator>
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">70762648</site>
<item>
	<title>Episode 276: Information Commissioner Caroline Maynard on Canada’s Access to Information Failures and Why Access Delayed is Access Denied</title>
	<link>https://www.michaelgeist.ca/podcast/episode-276-information-commissioner-caroline-maynard-on-canadas-access-to-information-failures-and-why-access-delayed-is-access-denied/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=episode-276-information-commissioner-caroline-maynard-on-canadas-access-to-information-failures-and-why-access-delayed-is-access-denied</link>
	<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 10:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Geist]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.michaelgeist.ca/?post_type=podcast&#038;p=22017</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[Despite repeated studies and promises for reform, Canada’s access to information system has long been plagued by long delays, overbroad exclusions, insufficient resources, and an Information Commissioner without the resources and powers needed to fully ensure compliance.
The government is currently undertaking yet another reform process as the Treasury Board has released proposed changes. They’ve left Caroline Maynard, Canada’s Information Commissioner, largely unimpressed. She is relieved the government is open to change, but warns that the approaches “lack ambition” and, more pointedly, that the review “must not become a justification for further secrecy.” Commissioner Maynard joins the Law Bytes podcast to walk through her concerns with the government’s plans and her proposals for improving Canada’s access to information law.]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[Despite repeated studies and promises for reform, Canada’s access to information system has long been plagued by long delays, overbroad exclusions, insufficient resources, and an Information Commissioner without the resources and powers needed to fully e]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[Despite repeated studies and promises for reform, Canada’s access to information system has long been plagued by long delays, overbroad exclusions, insufficient resources, and an Information Commissioner without the resources and powers needed to fully ensure compliance.
The government is currently undertaking yet another reform process as the Treasury Board has released proposed changes. They’ve left Caroline Maynard, Canada’s Information Commissioner, largely unimpressed. She is relieved the government is open to change, but warns that the approaches “lack ambition” and, more pointedly, that the review “must not become a justification for further secrecy.” Commissioner Maynard joins the Law Bytes podcast to walk through her concerns with the government’s plans and her proposals for improving Canada’s access to information law.]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://chtbl.com/track/ED9CFB/www.michaelgeist.ca/podcast-download/22017/episode-276-information-commissioner-caroline-maynard-on-canadas-access-to-information-failures-and-why-access-delayed-is-access-denied.mp3" length="25804157" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[Despite repeated studies and promises for reform, Canada’s access to information system has long been plagued by long delays, overbroad exclusions, insufficient resources, and an Information Commissioner without the resources and powers needed to fully ensure compliance.
The government is currently undertaking yet another reform process as the Treasury Board has released proposed changes. They’ve left Caroline Maynard, Canada’s Information Commissioner, largely unimpressed. She is relieved the government is open to change, but warns that the approaches “lack ambition” and, more pointedly, that the review “must not become a justification for further secrecy.” Commissioner Maynard joins the Law Bytes podcast to walk through her concerns with the government’s plans and her proposals for improving Canada’s access to information law.]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>00:33:44</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[Michael Geist]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[Despite repeated studies and promises for reform, Canada’s access to information system has long been plagued by long delays, overbroad exclusions, insufficient resources, and an Information Commissioner without the resources and powers needed to fully ensure compliance.
The government is currently undertaking yet another reform process as the Treasury Board has released proposed changes. They’ve left Caroline Maynard, Canada’s Information Commissioner, largely unimpressed. She is relieved the government is open to change, but warns that the approaches “lack ambition” and, more pointedly, that the review “must not become a justification for further secrecy.” Commissioner Maynard joins the Law Bytes podcast to walk through her concerns with the government’s plans and her proposals for improving Canada’s access to information law.]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Episode 275: David Loukidelis on Why Stripping Privacy Enforcement from Canada’s Privacy Commissioner in Bill C-36 is Unnecessarily Risky Policy</title>
	<link>https://www.michaelgeist.ca/podcast/episode-275-david-loukidelis-on-why-stripping-privacy-enforcement-from-canadas-privacy-commissioner-in-bill-c-36-is-unnecessarily-risky-policy/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=episode-275-david-loukidelis-on-why-stripping-privacy-enforcement-from-canadas-privacy-commissioner-in-bill-c-36-is-unnecessarily-risky-policy</link>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 10:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Geist]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.michaelgeist.ca/?post_type=podcast&#038;p=21983</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[The government’s privacy reform bill was supposed to earn applause for its effort to modernize outdated rules and provide Canadians with stronger privacy protections. Yet the decision to strip the Privacy Commissioner of Canada of responsibility for private-sector privacy law and shift that responsibility to the Digital Safety Commission has sparked widespread concern among Canadian privacy experts. This week’s Law Bytes podcast speaks to David Loukidelis, one of Canada’s best-regarded former privacy commissioners. Loukidelis served as BC's Information and Privacy Commissioner from 1999 to 2010, where he was responsible for the enforcement of BC's Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act and Personal Information Protection Act, which came into force in 2004. He joins me on the podcast to share his thoughts on the enforcement changes in the bill and what it may mean for privacy in Canada.]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[The government’s privacy reform bill was supposed to earn applause for its effort to modernize outdated rules and provide Canadians with stronger privacy protections. Yet the decision to strip the Privacy Commissioner of Canada of responsibility for priv]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[The government’s privacy reform bill was supposed to earn applause for its effort to modernize outdated rules and provide Canadians with stronger privacy protections. Yet the decision to strip the Privacy Commissioner of Canada of responsibility for private-sector privacy law and shift that responsibility to the Digital Safety Commission has sparked widespread concern among Canadian privacy experts. This week’s Law Bytes podcast speaks to David Loukidelis, one of Canada’s best-regarded former privacy commissioners. Loukidelis served as BC's Information and Privacy Commissioner from 1999 to 2010, where he was responsible for the enforcement of BC's Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act and Personal Information Protection Act, which came into force in 2004. He joins me on the podcast to share his thoughts on the enforcement changes in the bill and what it may mean for privacy in Canada.]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://chtbl.com/track/ED9CFB/www.michaelgeist.ca/podcast-download/21983/episode-275-david-loukidelis-on-why-stripping-privacy-enforcement-from-canadas-privacy-commissioner-in-bill-c-36-is-unnecessarily-risky-policy.mp3" length="24201533" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[The government’s privacy reform bill was supposed to earn applause for its effort to modernize outdated rules and provide Canadians with stronger privacy protections. Yet the decision to strip the Privacy Commissioner of Canada of responsibility for private-sector privacy law and shift that responsibility to the Digital Safety Commission has sparked widespread concern among Canadian privacy experts. This week’s Law Bytes podcast speaks to David Loukidelis, one of Canada’s best-regarded former privacy commissioners. Loukidelis served as BC's Information and Privacy Commissioner from 1999 to 2010, where he was responsible for the enforcement of BC's Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act and Personal Information Protection Act, which came into force in 2004. He joins me on the podcast to share his thoughts on the enforcement changes in the bill and what it may mean for privacy in Canada.]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>00:31:59</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[Michael Geist]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[The government’s privacy reform bill was supposed to earn applause for its effort to modernize outdated rules and provide Canadians with stronger privacy protections. Yet the decision to strip the Privacy Commissioner of Canada of responsibility for private-sector privacy law and shift that responsibility to the Digital Safety Commission has sparked widespread concern among Canadian privacy experts. This week’s Law Bytes podcast speaks to David Loukidelis, one of Canada’s best-regarded former privacy commissioners. Loukidelis served as BC's Information and Privacy Commissioner from 1999 to 2010, where he was responsible for the enforcement of BC's Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act and Personal Information Protection Act, which came into force in 2004. He joins me on the podcast to share his thoughts on the enforcement changes in the bill and what it may mean for privacy in Canada.]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Episode 273: Rebroadcast of the Globe and Mail’s The Decibel on Canada’s First Steps Towards a Social Media Ban</title>
	<link>https://www.michaelgeist.ca/podcast/episode-273-rebroadcast-of-the-globe-and-mails-the-decibel-on-canadas-first-steps-towards-a-social-media-ban/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=episode-273-rebroadcast-of-the-globe-and-mails-the-decibel-on-canadas-first-steps-towards-a-social-media-ban</link>
	<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2026 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Geist]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.michaelgeist.ca/?post_type=podcast&#038;p=21929</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[Bill C-34, the Safe Social Media Act, has quickly become a lightning rod for debate since its introduction earlier this month. The issue that invariably tops the list is the kids’ social media ban. Bill C-34, along with the recently introduced Bill C-36, will be covered from multiple angles in the weeks ahead. For the moment, I am pleased to rebroadcast a recent episode of the Globe and Mail’s The Decibel podcast. I was invited to appear on the program, where I was interviewed by Sherrill Sutherland about Bill C-34, the ban, and online harms and safety more broadly. I am grateful to the Globe for granting permission to rebroadcast the episode on my podcast uncut, in its entirety.]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[Bill C-34, the Safe Social Media Act, has quickly become a lightning rod for debate since its introduction earlier this month. The issue that invariably tops the list is the kids’ social media ban. Bill C-34, along with the recently introduced Bill C-36,]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[Bill C-34, the Safe Social Media Act, has quickly become a lightning rod for debate since its introduction earlier this month. The issue that invariably tops the list is the kids’ social media ban. Bill C-34, along with the recently introduced Bill C-36, will be covered from multiple angles in the weeks ahead. For the moment, I am pleased to rebroadcast a recent episode of the Globe and Mail’s The Decibel podcast. I was invited to appear on the program, where I was interviewed by Sherrill Sutherland about Bill C-34, the ban, and online harms and safety more broadly. I am grateful to the Globe for granting permission to rebroadcast the episode on my podcast uncut, in its entirety.]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://chtbl.com/track/ED9CFB/www.michaelgeist.ca/podcast-download/21929/episode-273-rebroadcast-of-the-globe-and-mails-the-decibel-on-canadas-first-steps-towards-a-social-media-ban.mp3" length="27669731" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[Bill C-34, the Safe Social Media Act, has quickly become a lightning rod for debate since its introduction earlier this month. The issue that invariably tops the list is the kids’ social media ban. Bill C-34, along with the recently introduced Bill C-36, will be covered from multiple angles in the weeks ahead. For the moment, I am pleased to rebroadcast a recent episode of the Globe and Mail’s The Decibel podcast. I was invited to appear on the program, where I was interviewed by Sherrill Sutherland about Bill C-34, the ban, and online harms and safety more broadly. I am grateful to the Globe for granting permission to rebroadcast the episode on my podcast uncut, in its entirety.]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>00:28:36</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[Michael Geist]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[Bill C-34, the Safe Social Media Act, has quickly become a lightning rod for debate since its introduction earlier this month. The issue that invariably tops the list is the kids’ social media ban. Bill C-34, along with the recently introduced Bill C-36, will be covered from multiple angles in the weeks ahead. For the moment, I am pleased to rebroadcast a recent episode of the Globe and Mail’s The Decibel podcast. I was invited to appear on the program, where I was interviewed by Sherrill Sutherland about Bill C-34, the ban, and online harms and safety more broadly. I am grateful to the Globe for granting permission to rebroadcast the episode on my podcast uncut, in its entirety.]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Episode 270: Roundtable on the Bill C-22 Risks for Canadian Tech Companies Featuring VPN Services Tailscale and Windscribe</title>
	<link>https://www.michaelgeist.ca/podcast/episode-270-roundtable-on-the-bill-c-22-risks-for-canadian-tech-companies-featuring-vpn-services-tailscale-and-windscribe/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=episode-270-roundtable-on-the-bill-c-22-risks-for-canadian-tech-companies-featuring-vpn-services-tailscale-and-windscribe</link>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 10:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Geist]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.michaelgeist.ca/?post_type=podcast&#038;p=21754</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[Over the past week, the concerns over Bill C-22, the government’s lawful access bill, continued to mount. Many companies, notably including Apple, Google, Meta, Signal, and DuckDuckGo, have spoken out against the bill. So too has the VPN sector, with some warning that they can’t remain in Canada if the bill goes ahead as is. This week, the CEOs of two of the companies that have spoken out against Bill C-22 join the Law Bytes podcast to explain. Avery Pennerun, the CEO of Tailscale, and Yegor Sak, the CEO of Windscribe, explain their businesses, discuss concerns about mandatory metadata retention and backdoor access to encryption, and consider what the law might mean for the future of their companies in Canada.]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[Over the past week, the concerns over Bill C-22, the government’s lawful access bill, continued to mount. Many companies, notably including Apple, Google, Meta, Signal, and DuckDuckGo, have spoken out against the bill. So too has the VPN sector, with som]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[Over the past week, the concerns over Bill C-22, the government’s lawful access bill, continued to mount. Many companies, notably including Apple, Google, Meta, Signal, and DuckDuckGo, have spoken out against the bill. So too has the VPN sector, with some warning that they can’t remain in Canada if the bill goes ahead as is. This week, the CEOs of two of the companies that have spoken out against Bill C-22 join the Law Bytes podcast to explain. Avery Pennerun, the CEO of Tailscale, and Yegor Sak, the CEO of Windscribe, explain their businesses, discuss concerns about mandatory metadata retention and backdoor access to encryption, and consider what the law might mean for the future of their companies in Canada.]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://chtbl.com/track/ED9CFB/www.michaelgeist.ca/podcast-download/21754/episode-270-roundtable-on-the-bill-c-22-risks-for-canadian-tech-companies-featuring-vpn-services-tailscale-and-windscribe.mp3" length="24729325" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[Over the past week, the concerns over Bill C-22, the government’s lawful access bill, continued to mount. Many companies, notably including Apple, Google, Meta, Signal, and DuckDuckGo, have spoken out against the bill. So too has the VPN sector, with some warning that they can’t remain in Canada if the bill goes ahead as is. This week, the CEOs of two of the companies that have spoken out against Bill C-22 join the Law Bytes podcast to explain. Avery Pennerun, the CEO of Tailscale, and Yegor Sak, the CEO of Windscribe, explain their businesses, discuss concerns about mandatory metadata retention and backdoor access to encryption, and consider what the law might mean for the future of their companies in Canada.]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>00:28:55</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[Michael Geist]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[Over the past week, the concerns over Bill C-22, the government’s lawful access bill, continued to mount. Many companies, notably including Apple, Google, Meta, Signal, and DuckDuckGo, have spoken out against the bill. So too has the VPN sector, with some warning that they can’t remain in Canada if the bill goes ahead as is. This week, the CEOs of two of the companies that have spoken out against Bill C-22 join the Law Bytes podcast to explain. Avery Pennerun, the CEO of Tailscale, and Yegor Sak, the CEO of Windscribe, explain their businesses, discuss concerns about mandatory metadata retention and backdoor access to encryption, and consider what the law might mean for the future of their companies in Canada.]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Episode 269: Inside the Bill C-22 Committee Hearing for the Case Against Government’s Lawful Access Plans</title>
	<link>https://www.michaelgeist.ca/podcast/episode-269-inside-the-bill-c-22-hearing-for-the-case-against-governments-lawful-access-plans/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=episode-269-inside-the-bill-c-22-hearing-for-the-case-against-governments-lawful-access-plans</link>
	<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 10:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Geist]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.michaelgeist.ca/?post_type=podcast&#038;p=21720</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[The government’s lawful access bill has been the target of criticism for weeks, with companies, governments, and experts on privacy and security all sounding the alarm. Much of the momentum against the bill began to build once the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security held hearings on the legislation, providing an opportunity for critics to voice their concerns. Those hearings continue this week with both Google and Apple scheduled to appear. For this episode of the Law Bytes podcast, I go into the hearing room for my appearance on Bill C-22. The appearance was a rerun of the podcast episode featuring a roundtable on the bill with David Fraser and Robert Diab. This episode starts with my opening statement and follows with exchanges with MPs from all parties on a wide range of issues.]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[The government’s lawful access bill has been the target of criticism for weeks, with companies, governments, and experts on privacy and security all sounding the alarm. Much of the momentum against the bill began to build once the Standing Committee on P]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[The government’s lawful access bill has been the target of criticism for weeks, with companies, governments, and experts on privacy and security all sounding the alarm. Much of the momentum against the bill began to build once the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security held hearings on the legislation, providing an opportunity for critics to voice their concerns. Those hearings continue this week with both Google and Apple scheduled to appear. For this episode of the Law Bytes podcast, I go into the hearing room for my appearance on Bill C-22. The appearance was a rerun of the podcast episode featuring a roundtable on the bill with David Fraser and Robert Diab. This episode starts with my opening statement and follows with exchanges with MPs from all parties on a wide range of issues.]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://chtbl.com/track/ED9CFB/www.michaelgeist.ca/podcast-download/21720/episode-269-inside-the-bill-c-22-hearing-for-the-case-against-governments-lawful-access-plans.mp3" length="28692341" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[The government’s lawful access bill has been the target of criticism for weeks, with companies, governments, and experts on privacy and security all sounding the alarm. Much of the momentum against the bill began to build once the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security held hearings on the legislation, providing an opportunity for critics to voice their concerns. Those hearings continue this week with both Google and Apple scheduled to appear. For this episode of the Law Bytes podcast, I go into the hearing room for my appearance on Bill C-22. The appearance was a rerun of the podcast episode featuring a roundtable on the bill with David Fraser and Robert Diab. This episode starts with my opening statement and follows with exchanges with MPs from all parties on a wide range of issues.]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>00:33:42</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[Michael Geist]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[The government’s lawful access bill has been the target of criticism for weeks, with companies, governments, and experts on privacy and security all sounding the alarm. Much of the momentum against the bill began to build once the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security held hearings on the legislation, providing an opportunity for critics to voice their concerns. Those hearings continue this week with both Google and Apple scheduled to appear. For this episode of the Law Bytes podcast, I go into the hearing room for my appearance on Bill C-22. The appearance was a rerun of the podcast episode featuring a roundtable on the bill with David Fraser and Robert Diab. This episode starts with my opening statement and follows with exchanges with MPs from all parties on a wide range of issues.]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Ep. 265 &#8211; Jason Millar on Claude Mythos, Project Glasswing, and the Governance Crisis in Frontier AI</title>
	<link>https://www.michaelgeist.ca/podcast/ep-265-jason-millar-on-claude-mythos-project-glasswing-and-the-governance-crisis-in-frontier-ai/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=ep-265-jason-millar-on-claude-mythos-project-glasswing-and-the-governance-crisis-in-frontier-ai</link>
	<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 10:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Geist]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.michaelgeist.ca/?post_type=podcast&#038;p=21554</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[In a year in which AI has truly dominated much of the news cycle, the story of Anthropic’s Mythos may be the biggest story of them all. A version of the popular Claude AI service is reportedly so powerful that the company can’t release it to the public yet. As governments race to meet with company officials, there are serious cybersecurity risks, prompting many leading software companies to join a new working group to get ahead of the issue before the AI model is publicly released.

<a href="https://www.craiedl.ca/team/jason-millar">Jason Millar</a> is a colleague at the University of Ottawa, where he holds the Canada Research Chair in the Ethical Engineering of Robotics and Artificial Intelligence. He joins the Law Bytes podcast to talk about Anthropic’s Mythos, the AI governance challenges, the importance of distinguishing between AI security and AI safety, and what governments should be doing to address this latest AI challenge.

<strong>Show Notes:</strong>

<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_brOOGx9Chs">ABC News, Cybersecurity Concerns About Anthropic’s ‘Claude Mythos’ Explained, April 9, 2026</a>]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[In a year in which AI has truly dominated much of the news cycle, the story of Anthropic’s Mythos may be the biggest story of them all. A version of the popular Claude AI service is reportedly so powerful that the company can’t release it to the public y]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[In a year in which AI has truly dominated much of the news cycle, the story of Anthropic’s Mythos may be the biggest story of them all. A version of the popular Claude AI service is reportedly so powerful that the company can’t release it to the public yet. As governments race to meet with company officials, there are serious cybersecurity risks, prompting many leading software companies to join a new working group to get ahead of the issue before the AI model is publicly released.

<a href="https://www.craiedl.ca/team/jason-millar">Jason Millar</a> is a colleague at the University of Ottawa, where he holds the Canada Research Chair in the Ethical Engineering of Robotics and Artificial Intelligence. He joins the Law Bytes podcast to talk about Anthropic’s Mythos, the AI governance challenges, the importance of distinguishing between AI security and AI safety, and what governments should be doing to address this latest AI challenge.

<strong>Show Notes:</strong>

<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_brOOGx9Chs">ABC News, Cybersecurity Concerns About Anthropic’s ‘Claude Mythos’ Explained, April 9, 2026</a>]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://chtbl.com/track/ED9CFB/www.michaelgeist.ca/podcast-download/21554/ep-265-jason-millar-on-claude-mythos-project-glasswing-and-the-governance-crisis-in-frontier-ai.mp3" length="27268425" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[In a year in which AI has truly dominated much of the news cycle, the story of Anthropic’s Mythos may be the biggest story of them all. A version of the popular Claude AI service is reportedly so powerful that the company can’t release it to the public yet. As governments race to meet with company officials, there are serious cybersecurity risks, prompting many leading software companies to join a new working group to get ahead of the issue before the AI model is publicly released.

Jason Millar is a colleague at the University of Ottawa, where he holds the Canada Research Chair in the Ethical Engineering of Robotics and Artificial Intelligence. He joins the Law Bytes podcast to talk about Anthropic’s Mythos, the AI governance challenges, the importance of distinguishing between AI security and AI safety, and what governments should be doing to address this latest AI challenge.

Show Notes:

ABC News, Cybersecurity Concerns About Anthropic’s ‘Claude Mythos’ Explained, April 9, 2026]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>00:34:38</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[Michael Geist]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[In a year in which AI has truly dominated much of the news cycle, the story of Anthropic’s Mythos may be the biggest story of them all. A version of the popular Claude AI service is reportedly so powerful that the company can’t release it to the public yet. As governments race to meet with company officials, there are serious cybersecurity risks, prompting many leading software companies to join a new working group to get ahead of the issue before the AI model is publicly released.

Jason Millar is a colleague at the University of Ottawa, where he holds the Canada Research Chair in the Ethical Engineering of Robotics and Artificial Intelligence. He joins the Law Bytes podcast to talk about Anthropic’s Mythos, the AI governance challenges, the importance of distinguishing between AI security and AI safety, and what governments should be doing to address this latest AI challenge.

Show Notes:

ABC News, Cybersecurity Concerns About Anthropic’s ‘Claude Mythos’ Explained, April 9, 2]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Episode 261: Ian Goldberg on the Privacy Risks of Age Assurance Technologies</title>
	<link>https://www.michaelgeist.ca/podcast/episode-261-ian-goldberg-on-the-privacy-risks-of-age-assurance-technologies/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=episode-261-ian-goldberg-on-the-privacy-risks-of-age-assurance-technologies</link>
	<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2026 10:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Geist]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.michaelgeist.ca/?post_type=podcast&#038;p=21416</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[Age verification, estimation or inference is seemingly all the rage right now. Vendors are promoting it as the solution to thorny challenges to limit access to certain sites and services and politicians are eager to legislate in that direction, including in Canada with Bill S-209. Hundreds of scientists and technology experts from around the world have taken note of the trend and come together to issue a public letter warning about the privacy, safety and discrimination risks associated with these technologies. Ian Goldberg, who holds the Canada Research Chair in Privacy Enhancing Technologies at the University of Waterloo, was one of the signatories. Ian has long been engaged at the intersection between technology and privacy and joins the Law Bytes podcast to discuss the age assurance technologies, how privacy enhancing technologies could address some of the concerns, and the risks with current legislative approaches.]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[Age verification, estimation or inference is seemingly all the rage right now. Vendors are promoting it as the solution to thorny challenges to limit access to certain sites and services and politicians are eager to legislate in that direction, including]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[Age verification, estimation or inference is seemingly all the rage right now. Vendors are promoting it as the solution to thorny challenges to limit access to certain sites and services and politicians are eager to legislate in that direction, including in Canada with Bill S-209. Hundreds of scientists and technology experts from around the world have taken note of the trend and come together to issue a public letter warning about the privacy, safety and discrimination risks associated with these technologies. Ian Goldberg, who holds the Canada Research Chair in Privacy Enhancing Technologies at the University of Waterloo, was one of the signatories. Ian has long been engaged at the intersection between technology and privacy and joins the Law Bytes podcast to discuss the age assurance technologies, how privacy enhancing technologies could address some of the concerns, and the risks with current legislative approaches.]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://chtbl.com/track/ED9CFB/www.michaelgeist.ca/podcast-download/21416/episode-261-ian-goldberg-on-the-privacy-risks-of-age-assurance-technologies.mp3" length="26914745" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[Age verification, estimation or inference is seemingly all the rage right now. Vendors are promoting it as the solution to thorny challenges to limit access to certain sites and services and politicians are eager to legislate in that direction, including in Canada with Bill S-209. Hundreds of scientists and technology experts from around the world have taken note of the trend and come together to issue a public letter warning about the privacy, safety and discrimination risks associated with these technologies. Ian Goldberg, who holds the Canada Research Chair in Privacy Enhancing Technologies at the University of Waterloo, was one of the signatories. Ian has long been engaged at the intersection between technology and privacy and joins the Law Bytes podcast to discuss the age assurance technologies, how privacy enhancing technologies could address some of the concerns, and the risks with current legislative approaches.]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>00:32:03</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[Michael Geist]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[Age verification, estimation or inference is seemingly all the rage right now. Vendors are promoting it as the solution to thorny challenges to limit access to certain sites and services and politicians are eager to legislate in that direction, including in Canada with Bill S-209. Hundreds of scientists and technology experts from around the world have taken note of the trend and come together to issue a public letter warning about the privacy, safety and discrimination risks associated with these technologies. Ian Goldberg, who holds the Canada Research Chair in Privacy Enhancing Technologies at the University of Waterloo, was one of the signatories. Ian has long been engaged at the intersection between technology and privacy and joins the Law Bytes podcast to discuss the age assurance technologies, how privacy enhancing technologies could address some of the concerns, and the risks with current legislative approaches.]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Episode 260: What the Government Didn’t Want You To Hear About Bill C-4 And Its Weak Political Party Privacy Rules</title>
	<link>https://www.michaelgeist.ca/podcast/episode-260-what-the-government-didnt-want-you-to-hear-about-how-bill-c-4-undermines-political-party-privacy-rules/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=episode-260-what-the-government-didnt-want-you-to-hear-about-how-bill-c-4-undermines-political-party-privacy-rules</link>
	<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2026 10:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Geist]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.michaelgeist.ca/?post_type=podcast&#038;p=21382</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[Last spring, the government quietly inserted provisions that exempt political parties from the application of privacy protections in Bill C-4, an “affordability measures” bill. The government barely acknowledged the provision in its the study of the bill at the House of Commons and refused to even hear witnesses on the issue. The Senate didn’t play along however. It conducted hearings on the privacy rules and the Senators didn’t like what they heard, amending the bill by including a sunset clause on the privacy provisions that gives that the government three years to come up with something better. The bill heads back to the House of Commons, where the government can either accept the change and have the bill pass or reject the change and send it back again to the Senate. This Law Bytes podcast episode tells the story of what the Senate heard on Bill C-4. It is what the government did not want Canadians to hear and would prefer to ignore altogether. There were witnesses from advocacy groups, but the episode focuses on testimony from privacy commissioners (current and former) along with Elections Canada leadership.]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[Last spring, the government quietly inserted provisions that exempt political parties from the application of privacy protections in Bill C-4, an “affordability measures” bill. The government barely acknowledged the provision in its the study of the bill]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[Last spring, the government quietly inserted provisions that exempt political parties from the application of privacy protections in Bill C-4, an “affordability measures” bill. The government barely acknowledged the provision in its the study of the bill at the House of Commons and refused to even hear witnesses on the issue. The Senate didn’t play along however. It conducted hearings on the privacy rules and the Senators didn’t like what they heard, amending the bill by including a sunset clause on the privacy provisions that gives that the government three years to come up with something better. The bill heads back to the House of Commons, where the government can either accept the change and have the bill pass or reject the change and send it back again to the Senate. This Law Bytes podcast episode tells the story of what the Senate heard on Bill C-4. It is what the government did not want Canadians to hear and would prefer to ignore altogether. There were witnesses from advocacy groups, but the episode focuses on testimony from privacy commissioners (current and former) along with Elections Canada leadership.]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://chtbl.com/track/ED9CFB/www.michaelgeist.ca/podcast-download/21382/episode-260-what-the-government-didnt-want-you-to-hear-about-how-bill-c-4-undermines-political-party-privacy-rules.mp3" length="37015121" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[Last spring, the government quietly inserted provisions that exempt political parties from the application of privacy protections in Bill C-4, an “affordability measures” bill. The government barely acknowledged the provision in its the study of the bill at the House of Commons and refused to even hear witnesses on the issue. The Senate didn’t play along however. It conducted hearings on the privacy rules and the Senators didn’t like what they heard, amending the bill by including a sunset clause on the privacy provisions that gives that the government three years to come up with something better. The bill heads back to the House of Commons, where the government can either accept the change and have the bill pass or reject the change and send it back again to the Senate. This Law Bytes podcast episode tells the story of what the Senate heard on Bill C-4. It is what the government did not want Canadians to hear and would prefer to ignore altogether. There were witnesses from advocacy groups, but the episode focuses on testimony from privacy commissioners (current and former) along with Elections Canada leadership.]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>00:44:44</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[Michael Geist]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[Last spring, the government quietly inserted provisions that exempt political parties from the application of privacy protections in Bill C-4, an “affordability measures” bill. The government barely acknowledged the provision in its the study of the bill at the House of Commons and refused to even hear witnesses on the issue. The Senate didn’t play along however. It conducted hearings on the privacy rules and the Senators didn’t like what they heard, amending the bill by including a sunset clause on the privacy provisions that gives that the government three years to come up with something better. The bill heads back to the House of Commons, where the government can either accept the change and have the bill pass or reject the change and send it back again to the Senate. This Law Bytes podcast episode tells the story of what the Senate heard on Bill C-4. It is what the government did not want Canadians to hear and would prefer to ignore altogether. There were witnesses from advocacy g]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Episode 258: Jaxson Khan With an Insider Perspective on AI Policy Development in Canada</title>
	<link>https://www.michaelgeist.ca/podcast/episode-258-jaxson-khan-with-an-insider-perspective-on-ai-policy-development-in-canada/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=episode-258-jaxson-khan-with-an-insider-perspective-on-ai-policy-development-in-canada</link>
	<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2026 11:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Geist]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.michaelgeist.ca/?post_type=podcast&#038;p=21354</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 258: Jaxson Khan With an Insider Perspective on AI Policy Development in Canada

Earlier this month, the government quietly released a “what we heard” report this discussing the response to its 30-day sprint AI consultation from last October. The consultation was promoted as giving Canadians – including a 28 person expert advisory board – the chance to provide their views on AI as the AI Minister Evan Solomon works toward a national AI strategy. The consultation garnered some criticism for its speed and missing perspectives on the expert panel.  More recently on the use of AI to assess the results have sparked further doubts about it.

Jaxson Khan is the CEO and Founder of Aperature AI and a Senior Fellow at the Munk School of Global Affairs and Public Policy at the University of Toronto. But before that, he served as Senior Policy Advisor the Minister of Innovation Science and Industry, where AI was one of his lead responsibilities. Jaxson joins the Law Bytes podcast to provide an insider perspective on AI policy development along with his thoughts on the AI consultation and its results.

&nbsp;]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 258: Jaxson Khan With an Insider Perspective on AI Policy Development in Canada

Earlier this month, the government quietly released a “what we heard” report this discussing the response to its 30-day sprint AI consultati]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 258: Jaxson Khan With an Insider Perspective on AI Policy Development in Canada

Earlier this month, the government quietly released a “what we heard” report this discussing the response to its 30-day sprint AI consultation from last October. The consultation was promoted as giving Canadians – including a 28 person expert advisory board – the chance to provide their views on AI as the AI Minister Evan Solomon works toward a national AI strategy. The consultation garnered some criticism for its speed and missing perspectives on the expert panel.  More recently on the use of AI to assess the results have sparked further doubts about it.

Jaxson Khan is the CEO and Founder of Aperature AI and a Senior Fellow at the Munk School of Global Affairs and Public Policy at the University of Toronto. But before that, he served as Senior Policy Advisor the Minister of Innovation Science and Industry, where AI was one of his lead responsibilities. Jaxson joins the Law Bytes podcast to provide an insider perspective on AI policy development along with his thoughts on the AI consultation and its results.

&nbsp;]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://chtbl.com/track/ED9CFB/www.michaelgeist.ca/podcast-download/21354/episode-258-jaxson-khan-with-an-insider-perspective-on-ai-policy-development-in-canada.mp3" length="30075565" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 258: Jaxson Khan With an Insider Perspective on AI Policy Development in Canada

Earlier this month, the government quietly released a “what we heard” report this discussing the response to its 30-day sprint AI consultation from last October. The consultation was promoted as giving Canadians – including a 28 person expert advisory board – the chance to provide their views on AI as the AI Minister Evan Solomon works toward a national AI strategy. The consultation garnered some criticism for its speed and missing perspectives on the expert panel.  More recently on the use of AI to assess the results have sparked further doubts about it.

Jaxson Khan is the CEO and Founder of Aperature AI and a Senior Fellow at the Munk School of Global Affairs and Public Policy at the University of Toronto. But before that, he served as Senior Policy Advisor the Minister of Innovation Science and Industry, where AI was one of his lead responsibilities. Jaxson joins the Law Bytes podcast to provide an insider perspective on AI policy development along with his thoughts on the AI consultation and its results.

&nbsp;]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>00:38:09</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[Michael Geist]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 258: Jaxson Khan With an Insider Perspective on AI Policy Development in Canada

Earlier this month, the government quietly released a “what we heard” report this discussing the response to its 30-day sprint AI consultation from last October. The consultation was promoted as giving Canadians – including a 28 person expert advisory board – the chance to provide their views on AI as the AI Minister Evan Solomon works toward a national AI strategy. The consultation garnered some criticism for its speed and missing perspectives on the expert panel.  More recently on the use of AI to assess the results have sparked further doubts about it.

Jaxson Khan is the CEO and Founder of Aperature AI and a Senior Fellow at the Munk School of Global Affairs and Public Policy at the University of Toronto. But before that, he served as Senior Policy Advisor the Minister of Innovation Science and Industry, where AI was one of his lead responsibilities. Jaxson joins the]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Episode 257: Lisa Given on What Canada Can Learn From Australia’s Youth Social Media Ban</title>
	<link>https://www.michaelgeist.ca/podcast/episode-257-lisa-given-on-what-canada-can-learn-from-australias-youth-social-media-ban/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=episode-257-lisa-given-on-what-canada-can-learn-from-australias-youth-social-media-ban</link>
	<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2026 11:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Geist]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.michaelgeist.ca/?post_type=podcast&#038;p=21344</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[Social media bans for younger users have begun to take hold in various countries, particularly in Europe. In Canada, Bill S-209 may ostensibly be about underage access to pornography sites, but the bill’s proponents seem positively giddy at the prospect of a broader application to social media. This trend started in Australia, which passed a social media ban for those under 16 in late 2024 with the law taking effect just a couple of months ago.
Lisa Given is the Distinguished Professor of Information Sciences at the Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology or RMIT in Melbourne, Australia. She has been closely tracking and commenting on the Australian legislation and she joins the Law Bytes podcast to discuss its origins, how the law functions, the concerns it has raised, and what lessons Canada might draw from the experience to date.]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[Social media bans for younger users have begun to take hold in various countries, particularly in Europe. In Canada, Bill S-209 may ostensibly be about underage access to pornography sites, but the bill’s proponents seem positively giddy at the prospect ]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[Social media bans for younger users have begun to take hold in various countries, particularly in Europe. In Canada, Bill S-209 may ostensibly be about underage access to pornography sites, but the bill’s proponents seem positively giddy at the prospect of a broader application to social media. This trend started in Australia, which passed a social media ban for those under 16 in late 2024 with the law taking effect just a couple of months ago.
Lisa Given is the Distinguished Professor of Information Sciences at the Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology or RMIT in Melbourne, Australia. She has been closely tracking and commenting on the Australian legislation and she joins the Law Bytes podcast to discuss its origins, how the law functions, the concerns it has raised, and what lessons Canada might draw from the experience to date.]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://chtbl.com/track/ED9CFB/www.michaelgeist.ca/podcast-download/21344/episode-257-lisa-given-on-what-canada-can-learn-from-australias-youth-social-media-ban.mp3" length="25377881" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[Social media bans for younger users have begun to take hold in various countries, particularly in Europe. In Canada, Bill S-209 may ostensibly be about underage access to pornography sites, but the bill’s proponents seem positively giddy at the prospect of a broader application to social media. This trend started in Australia, which passed a social media ban for those under 16 in late 2024 with the law taking effect just a couple of months ago.
Lisa Given is the Distinguished Professor of Information Sciences at the Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology or RMIT in Melbourne, Australia. She has been closely tracking and commenting on the Australian legislation and she joins the Law Bytes podcast to discuss its origins, how the law functions, the concerns it has raised, and what lessons Canada might draw from the experience to date.]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>00:32:30</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[Michael Geist]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[Social media bans for younger users have begun to take hold in various countries, particularly in Europe. In Canada, Bill S-209 may ostensibly be about underage access to pornography sites, but the bill’s proponents seem positively giddy at the prospect of a broader application to social media. This trend started in Australia, which passed a social media ban for those under 16 in late 2024 with the law taking effect just a couple of months ago.
Lisa Given is the Distinguished Professor of Information Sciences at the Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology or RMIT in Melbourne, Australia. She has been closely tracking and commenting on the Australian legislation and she joins the Law Bytes podcast to discuss its origins, how the law functions, the concerns it has raised, and what lessons Canada might draw from the experience to date.]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/

Minified using disk

Served from: www.michaelgeist.ca @ 2026-07-26 12:48:38 by W3 Total Cache
-->