University of Toronto law professor Lisa Austin has a Globe op-ed on lawful access that highlights the difference between phone book data and Internet data likely captured by the forthcoming legislation.
Latest Posts
The Daily Digital Lock Dissenter, Day 45: Digital Security Coalition
Anti-circumvention rules should not apply in non-infringing circumstances, so they do not inadvertently impede ongoing research and innovation. The risk is in harming emerging Canadian digital security companies, and putting a “liability chill” on research in this area.
Copyright in the Balance This Week at the Supreme Court of Canada
My weekly technology law column (Toronto Star version, homepage version) notes the cases feature a who’s who of the Canadian copyright and communications world with the Entertainment Software Association of Canada (ESAC), Canadian Recording Industry Association, Apple, Bell Canada, Rogers Communications, and leading copyright collectives such as SOCAN and Access Copyright among the litigants.
The common theme among the cases is that they all originate with the Copyright Board of Canada. Whether the board is asked to establish tariffs for the communication of music or the copying of materials in schools, its decisions have become highly contested and invariably subject to judicial review.
It is possible that the Supreme Court is chiefly interested in the administrative law issues raised by the board rather than substantive copyright questions. Should it choose to wade into the copyright concerns, however, two issues jump out as the key ones.
Tories Have Yet to Prove Case for E-Snooping Bill
The Globe’s John Ibbitson on why the government has not made the case for lawful access. Ibbitson reports that the lawful access legislation will be bundled into a single bill to be introduced later this month or early next year. Public Safety Minister Vic Toews issues a non-responsive response, as […]
The Daily Digital Lock Dissenter, Day 44: New Brunswick Public Library Service
The circumvention of a digital lock for non-infringing purposes should be permitted.
An exception should also be made to anti-circumvention clauses to ensure that access to government information, laws, and court cases are never inaccessible to Canadians. As citizens, we should have an inalienable right to access this information.