Articles by: Michael Geist

Clearing Up the Copyright Confusion: Fair Dealing and Bill C-32

Fair dealing has played a prominent role in the hearings on Bill C-32, with education and creator groups debating the merits and impact of the proposed reforms.  Unfortunately, much of the discussion has confused rather than clarified the issue with misleading claims about potential losses, inaccurate comments on copyright and Internet materials, and dubious arguments about the compliance of the reforms under international copyright law.

Given the recent discussion, this lengthy post [also available as a PDF] seeks to clear up the confusion with an opening basic introduction to fair dealing and the proposed reforms followed by answers to many of the questions that have been raised over the past few months (a similar review of the digital lock rules can be found here [PDF]).

Bill C-32 and Fair Dealing – The Basics

Read more ›

December 15, 2010 26 comments News

GeistFAQonFairDealing

Geistfaqonfairdealing.pdf

Read more ›

December 15, 2010 Comments are Disabled General

Geist FAQ on Fair Dealing

geistfaqfairdealing.pdf

Read more ›

December 14, 2010 Comments are Disabled General

Geist Fair Dealing FAQ

geistfairdealingfaq.pdf

Read more ›

December 14, 2010 Comments are Disabled General
The No iPod Tax Press Conference: An Alternative Script

The No iPod Tax Press Conference: An Alternative Script

Clement & Moore on iPod Tax

Earlier today I walked a few blocks from my office to Ottawa’s Rideau Centre to attend a press conference with Industry Minister Tony Clement and Canadian Heritage Minister James Moore, who promised an important announcement.  The two ministers stood in front of an HMV and a group of students wearing t-shirts with No iPod tax logos on the back to declare that they were firmly set against a massive new tax on technology for all the holiday shoppers in the mall.  The Ministers claimed that all three opposition parties supported a tax of up to $75, which (reminiscent of the Dion “tax on everything” campaign) would apply to all technology devices and even cars.

The press conference suggests that opposition to extending the private copying levy may be the key positioning point for the government in support of Bill C-32.  Rather than focusing on the bill’s actual provisions, the government will argue that the bill deserves support from the public because of what isn’t there – the levy extension.  However, an alternate press conference might have featured the following script (the actual script is here):

Read more ›

December 14, 2010 77 comments News