Post Tagged with: "Copyright Microsite – About the Canadian DMCA"

Prentice’s Made in Canada Spin

Susan Delacourt of the Toronto Star reports that people have spotted signs around the Industry Canada headquarters sporting the slogan "Made in Canada Copyright Reform." The report suggests that Industry Minister Jim Prentice has dropped the "Putting Consumers First" line that he used at the spectrum auction announcement (consumers are […]

Read more ›

June 10, 2008 27 comments News

Why Notice-and-Notice Should Be Part of the Canadian DMCA

One of the few good points in the expected Canadian DMCA is likely to be Industry Minister Jim Prentice's decision to stick with a notice-and-notice approach for ISP liability.  I've described the system here.  This is the same approach that was proposed in Bill C-60 and has been used on […]

Read more ›

June 6, 2008 6 comments News

Prentice’s DMCA Indecision

The Globe and Mail reports this morning that the introduction of the Canadian DMCA has now been delayed until next week, though some MPs apparently believe that today is still the day.  While the indecision may be attributable to any number of things (the GM layoff announcement, the current pressure on the government arising from the Bernier affair, or the public criticism of a Canadian DMCA and ACTA), the real source of the problem is that Prentice has treated the copyright file primarily as a communications issue rather than as a policy one.  From the moment of his appointment as the Minister of Industry, his instructions from the Prime Minister have been clear – introduce a copyright bill and make sure that the U.S. is happy with it.  With that, the fear is that the concerns of many Canadian stakeholders have taken a backseat to satisfying the demands of the PMO and the USA.

Over the past two weeks, the plans for introducing the bill have continuously changed.  Sources say the initial plan was to get it out immediately after the Victoria Day weekend, press for the completion of second reading before the summer break, and then conduct summer hearings.  Now it may be just to get it out, or to wait until next week and do a dump and dash – introduce the Canadian DMCA and make a quick exit to Asia for the OECD meeting. 

I would argue that much of this could have been solved with greater transparency and consultation. 

Read more ›

June 4, 2008 20 comments News

Prentice’s DMCA Indecision

The Globe and Mail reports this morning that the introduction of the Canadian DMCA has now been delayed until next week, though some MPs apparently believe that today is still the day.  While the indecision may be attributable to any number of things (the GM layoff announcement, the current pressure on the government arising from the Bernier affair, or the public criticism of a Canadian DMCA and ACTA), the real source of the problem is that Prentice has treated the copyright file primarily as a communications issue rather than as a policy one.  From the moment of his appointment as the Minister of Industry, his instructions from the Prime Minister have been clear – introduce a copyright bill and make sure that the U.S. is happy with it.  With that, the fear is that the concerns of many Canadian stakeholders have taken a backseat to satisfying the demands of the PMO and the USA.

Over the past two weeks, the plans for introducing the bill have continuously changed.  Sources say the initial plan was to get it out immediately after the Victoria Day weekend, press for the completion of second reading before the summer break, and then conduct summer hearings.  Now it may be just to get it out, or to wait until next week and do a dump and dash – introduce the Canadian DMCA and make a quick exit to Asia for the OECD meeting. 

I would argue that much of this could have been solved with greater transparency and consultation. 

Read more ›

June 4, 2008 Comments are Disabled Stop CDMCA

Report Says Canadian DMCA To Include $500 Fine Per Download

The National Post reports that the Canadian DMCA, which may be introduced tomorrow, will include a "personal use download" fine of $500.  The front page story indicates that the fine (presumably a new form of statutory damage award) could be awarded on a per infringement basis, leading the possibility of […]

Read more ›

June 3, 2008 65 comments News