In addition to my Hill Times op-ed this week on the transformation of Canadian Heritage Minister James Moore from iPod minister to iPadlock minister, the paper includes a second article with some predictions for copyright reform.  The opening of the article includes a quote from Canadian Heritage Parliamentary Secretary Dean Del Mastro on the reform process:

"It would be naïve of me to say that we could introduce a bill on copyright that would be loved on all sides."

Del Mastro's comment is consistent with the conventional wisdom on copyright reform, namely that it is a contentious issue pitting users against creators that is difficult to reconcile.  Yet the conventional wisdom here may be wrong.  It is true that a copyright bill is unlikely to be loved by all sides. In fact, a bill loved by any side is probably a bill that does not strike the right balance (that is one of the reasons Moore's shift to strong support for C-61 digital lock rules is so problematic – one group loves it, some tolerate it, many hate it).  Far better, is a bill that is acceptable to all sides.  That means there will be compromises for all with the goal of crafting a bill that meets the most stakeholder needs and maintains the copyright balance.

Is that possible?  I think so.  The key elements in such a bill would include:

Read more ›