Fair Dealing by Giulia Forsythe (CC BY-NC-SA 2.0) https://flic.kr/p/dRkXwP

Fair Dealing by Giulia Forsythe (CC BY-NC-SA 2.0) https://flic.kr/p/dRkXwP

Copyright

Creators’ Copyright Coalition View of C-32 Stakeholders

“Creators vs. “educators, computer whizzes, and pirates.”

Read more ›

January 5, 2011 17 comments News

Vancouver Sun: Copyright fees Could Force Universities to Embrace Digital Age

The Vancouver Sun picks up on my earlier column on how Canadian universities may increasingly shift toward using technology to deliver materials in light of fees demanded by Access Copyright.  Macleans also covered the same issue last week and Osgoode Hall Dean Lorne Sossin predicts that this year could be […]

Read more ›

January 4, 2011 1 comment News

Copyright Predictions for 2011

Howard Knopf posts 12 copyright law and reform predictions for 2011, with an emphasis on Canada.

Read more ›

January 4, 2011 1 comment News

Public Domain Day 2011

Wallace McLean offers his annual Public Domain Day list of authors whose works entered into the public domain on January 1, 2011.

Read more ›

January 4, 2011 Comments are Disabled News

The Letters of the Law: 2010 in Tech Law from A to Z

The past twelve months in law and technology were exceptionally active, with the passage of anti-spam legislation, record penalties for violating the do-not-call list, and relentless lobbying on new Canadian copyright legislation. A look back at 2010 from A to Z (Toronto Star version, homepage version):

A is for the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement, which concluded in October with a watered-down treaty after the U.S. caved on several controversial Internet issues.

B is for Black v. Breeden, an Ontario Court of Appeal ruling involving postings on the Hollinger International, Inc. website that Conrad Black claimed were defamatory.

C is for Crookes v. Newton, the high-profile Supreme Court case that addressed the liability hyperlinks between websites.
                        
D is for the do-not-call list, which gained new life when the CRTC pressured Bell into paying $1.3 million for multiple violations of the list rules.

E is for the Electronic Commerce Protection Act, the initial name of Canada’s anti-spam legislation that received royal assent in December, six years after a task force recommended new Canadian spam laws.

Read more ›

December 28, 2010 12 comments Columns