Professor Geist comments on CNET and Canadian Press on the stunning Federal Court of Canada decision involving CRIA's request to compel ISPs to disclose the identities of their subscribers. The court denied the motion, ruling that CRIA failed to present the prima facie case needed to warrant disclosure. The court concluded that CRIA did not demonstrate that file sharers actually infringe on Canadian copyright law as it currently stands. see: Court Rejects Music Lawsuit also see: Judge: File Sharing Legal in Canada
Federal Court Denies CRIA Motion
March 31, 2004
Tags: CRIA / Federal Court / MotionCopyright Microsite - Canadian Copyrightcopyright reformCopyright Microsite - Music Industry
Share this post

Law Bytes
Episode 161: Canadian Chamber of Commerce President Perrin Beatty on Why the Government’s Bill C-18 Motion Establishes a Dangerous, Undemocratic Precedent
byMichael Geist

March 20, 2023
Michael Geist
March 13, 2023
Michael Geist
March 6, 2023
Michael Geist
February 27, 2023
Michael Geist
Search Results placeholder
Recent Posts
The Latest Bill C-11 Debate: Sacrificing Freedom of Expression for Quebec Culture Lobby Support
The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 161: Canadian Chamber of Commerce President Perrin Beatty on Why the Government’s Bill C-18 Motion Establishes a Dangerous, Undemocratic Precedent
The Biden Visit to Canada: Why Digital Policy is Emerging as a Serious Trade Tension
The Government’s Fishing Expedition: Why the Bill C-18 Motion Establishes a Dangerous Precedent For Those Who Dare to Oppose Legislation
Canadian Chamber of Commerce Warns on Government-Backed Bill C-18 Motion: “A Serious Threat to the Privacy of Canadians”