The Canadian Supreme Court issued the long-awaited Tariff 22 decision this morning. The court allowed the appeal, overturning a Federal Court decision to impose liability on ISPs for caching of content. The case also has a key jurisdictional element as the court ruled that there may be liability under Canadian copyright law at both the country where the music was transmitted as well as where it was received. The bottom line — the ISPs are big winners as they have had their position as an intermediary strongly affirmed by the court. When combined with another Supreme Court decision from earlier this year (CCH), the Canadian Supreme Court has made it very clear that ISPs should not be held responsible for copyright holders claims of infringement where they act as conduits for the transmission of data. There are three other key elements to the case. First, the court addresses the issue of Internet jurisdiction and rightly concludes that Canadian law may extend outside the country in certain circumstances. Second, it raises the prospect for a notice and takedown system, suggesting that the government should consider establishing rules around this issue. Third, one judge dives into the peer-to-peer file sharing case, expressing significant concern over the prospect for monitoring end users downloading habits and cautioning that copyright law should be interpreted with full respect for privacy rights. see: CAIP v. SOCAN also see: ISPs Free From Paying Royalties for Downloads 
				
								
			Supreme Court Issues Tariff 22 Decision
						June 30, 2004
						
		Tags: supreme court  /  Tariff 22Copyright Microsite - Music IndustryCopyright ColumnsCopyright Microsite - Canadian Copyright
					Share this post

Law Bytes
Episode 247: My Senate Appearance on the Bill That Could Lead to Canada-Wide Blocking of X, Reddit and ChatGPT
byMichael Geist

October 27, 2025
							Michael Geist
					October 20, 2025
							Michael Geist
					October 6, 2025
							Michael Geist
					September 22, 2025
							Michael Geist
					September 15, 2025
							Michael Geist
					Search Results placeholder
Recent Posts
 We Need More Canada in the Training Data: My Appearance Before the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage on AI and the Creative Sector We Need More Canada in the Training Data: My Appearance Before the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage on AI and the Creative Sector
 The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 247: My Senate Appearance on the Bill That Could Lead to Canada-Wide Blocking of X, Reddit and ChatGPT The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 247: My Senate Appearance on the Bill That Could Lead to Canada-Wide Blocking of X, Reddit and ChatGPT
 The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 246: Mohamed Zohiri on the Rise and Emerging Regulation of Stablecoins The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 246: Mohamed Zohiri on the Rise and Emerging Regulation of Stablecoins
 Senate Bill Would Grant Government Regulatory Power to Mandate Age Verification For Search, Social Media and AI Services Accompanied By Threat of Court Ordered Blocking of Lawful Content Senate Bill Would Grant Government Regulatory Power to Mandate Age Verification For Search, Social Media and AI Services Accompanied By Threat of Court Ordered Blocking of Lawful Content
 Government Reverses on Bill C-2: Removes Lawful Access Warrantless Demand Powers in New Border Bill Government Reverses on Bill C-2: Removes Lawful Access Warrantless Demand Powers in New Border Bill
