Add the National Union of Public and General Employees and the Council of Canadians to the list concerned with net neutrality. The CBC provides additional coverage.
Mounting Calls for Net Neutrality Action
March 28, 2008
Share this post
6 Comments

Law Bytes
Episode 264: Jon Penney on Chilling Effects in the Digital Age
byMichael Geist

March 30, 2026
Michael Geist
March 16, 2026
Michael Geist
Search Results placeholder
Michael Geist on Substack
Recent Posts
The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 264: Jon Penney on Chilling Effects in the Digital Age
Heads They Win, Tails We Lose: What Lies Behind the U.S. Trade Battle For Control over Data
Still Not a Privacy Law: Bill C-25’s Political Party Privacy Provisions Fall Short Again
Could Bill C-22 Make Canadians Less Safe? The Systemic Vulnerability Gap in Canada’s New Surveillance Law
Why the Verdict on Social Media Defective Design Harming Children Gets the Instinct Right But the Law Wrong

Nice
Great find! Thanks for posting the links.
Bell and Rogers are colluding to fix the price and services offered – they both throttle p2p and both have similar bit caps and their prices are pretty much the same and they pretty much control all of Ontario.. The only alternate option consumers have is a 3rd party DSL provider and now Bell is eliminating this option completely! People need to to be aware of what is happening so I hope these organizations continue to take a stance on this issue and the CBC keeps up the good work as I don’t see any Rogers or BCE owned news outlets reporting any of this (unless I have missed it which I may have).
Separating the competitive access issues
An article for IT World Canada’s BLOG may help clarify some of the specifics…
Separating the competitive access issues from the Net Neutrality issues.
[ link ]
and the Stop The Throttler! campaign:
[ link ]
Something very strange has happend to my Bell DSL since they announced the shaping.. I am now getting an extra 200Kbs(from 369 to 560 roughly) from bell on downloads during peak time.. Could they be shaping the service so that the 3rd party isp’s can’t match their service?
DDS
This is monopolizing against the public interest by entities that could be very soon foreign controlled. A matter of National Interest and Security.