It did not attract much attention, but last week the CRTC ruled that it is extending its Internet Traffic Management Practices framework to wireless data services. The ITMP framework address some net neutrality concerns. The CRTC had previously indicated that it expected wireless companies to comply with the framework, but the decision (which is effective immediately) provides a stronger legal foundation on the issue.
CRTC Extends Net Neutrality Rules to Wireless Data Services
6 Comments
Recent Posts
Senate Bill Would Grant Government Regulatory Power to Mandate Age Verification For Search, Social Media and AI Services Accompanied By Threat of Court Ordered Blocking of Lawful Content 
Government Reverses on Bill C-2: Removes Lawful Access Warrantless Demand Powers in New Border Bill 
Why The Recent TikTok Privacy Ruling Swaps Privacy for Increased Surveillance 
The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 245: Kate Robertson on Bill C-2’s Cross-Border Data Sharing Privacy Risks 
The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 244: Kris Klein on the Long Road to a Right to be Forgotten Under Canadian Privacy Law
Does this mean that wireless providers cannot now disallow VOIP (e.g. skype) on their networks?
dunno
Seems to me that the likes of Bell’s crippled firmwares on their “not-so-smart” phones that prevent competing apps can now get them in some heat.
Wasn’t aware of “Telecom Regulatory Policy CRTC 2009-657”.
http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/archive/2009/2009-657.htm
Jim R. It appears they need CRTC approval before blocking VOIP, and the CRTC will want to know why VOIP needs to be blocked to ensure the integrity of the network.
sure you can use VOIP…
I’m sure you’ll be able to legally use VOIP on your cell phone. Just so long as it doesn’t involve circumventing any TPMs…
curgoth,
The terms of service of several wireless providers explicitly disallow VOIP – hence, my question, as it would appear that there’s now a conflict between those TOSs and the ITMP framework.
Jim, Many ISP prohibit hosting “servers” or sharing your Internet connection as well. By the same token, that would appear to conflict with the ITMP framework.