No related posts.


Win, Lose or Draw?: The Federal Court of Appeal Overrules a Key Copyright Case on Procedural Grounds
The Lawful Access Debate Begins: Canadians Should Pay Attention to What the Government Isn’t Saying
The Global Battle for Data Control: How the 2026 U.S. Report on Trade Barriers Targets Data Sovereignty Worldwide
The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 264: Jon Penney on Chilling Effects in the Digital Age
Heads They Win, Tails We Lose: What Lies Behind the U.S. Trade Battle For Control over Data
Michael Geist
mgeist@uottawa.ca
This web site is licensed under a Creative Commons License, although certain works referenced herein may be separately licensed.
Sigh…
Always one step forward, two steps back.
Something missing
There’s something missing from the “Understanding Cyber Threats” section.
Those closed source, patented/copyrighted/DRMed applications that no one but their authors know what they are really doing. Like those iPhone/Android applications that “phone home” to their creators sending a wealth of personal information without the user being aware of what’s really happening.
Check here:
http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9179894/Free_Android_apps_scrape_personal_data_send_it_to_China?taxonomyId=75
or here:
http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/1725670/black-hat-android-wallpaper-apps-stealing
Time to check again what closed source/DRM are really about.
Nap.
…
And an iPhone related one:
http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/dear_iphone_users_your_apps_are_spying_on_you.php
Nap.
RE:Napalm
Very good observations, Napalm. When it comes to a privacy/proprietary software/DRM standpoint, the iPhone OS is proabably the worst of the two (and Windows Phone 7 will probably be just as bad). At least Android is Free-as-in-freedom software to an extent.
BTW, the term “closed source” just doesn’t send the right message. “Proprietary” is a more accurate term, FYI.