The creation of an Artists’ Resale Right has been adopted in many countries to at best mixed reviews. They’re unsurprisingly widely supported by potential beneficiaries, but the data on who actually benefits raises real questions about the wisdom of the policy. Canada may be headed in the same policy direction as the government recently announced in its budget plans to introduce the measure. Professor Guy Rub is the Vincent J. Marella Professor of Law at Temple University’s Beasley School of Law and an expert in the intersection between intellectual property law, commercial law, the arts, and economic theory. Professor Rub has written critically about the Artists’ Resale Right including as part of a submission to a House of Commons committee that studied the issue several years ago. He joins the Law Bytes podcast to discuss the policy measure and its drawbacks, including his view that it primarily benefits artists who are wealthy, old, or dead.
The podcast can be downloaded here, accessed on YouTube, and is embedded below. Subscribe to the podcast via Apple Podcast, Spotify or the RSS feed. Updates on the podcast on X/Twitter at @Lawbytespod.
Credits:
ABC News (Australia), Dealers Critical of Art Royalties, January 19, 2012








Gather, protect, and expand – experience the excitement of steal a brainrot, where your collection of Brainrots fuels your empire.
Find out how this single mom was able to earn $6k/monthly for working at her home for a few hours a day and how you can do it yourself .. Read More
TAB in my name
Sure it’s essentially a regressive policy that benefits the wealthiest visual artists most. However, it also acts as a 5% tax increase on the extremely wealthy that trade in such art in order to take advantage of freeport tax loopholes. Here the tax doesn’t go to a central government account for more nuanced use, but instead bypasses that to go to artists directly. It’d be great to tax and redistribute as part of a broader arts program to help artists that could use it more, but this doesn’t come with the easy to identify word “tax” which is easy to get the public to oppose and crush (see carbon tax).
Interesting discussion! It makes me think twice about whether the artists’ resale right really helps most artists or just a few wealthy ones.
Professor Rub’s insights are sharp. A simple resale right might only benefit elite artists, ignoring those at the bottom.
Worried this becomes an “art tax,” driving Canadian trades abroad. Good intentions, but difficult execution.
I particularly appreciate the clarity and conviction with which you addressed this complex snow rider 3d.