University of Toronto law professor Lisa Austin has a Globe op-ed on lawful access that highlights the difference between phone book data and Internet data likely captured by the forthcoming legislation.
News
The Daily Digital Lock Dissenter, Day 45: Digital Security Coalition
Anti-circumvention rules should not apply in non-infringing circumstances, so they do not inadvertently impede ongoing research and innovation. The risk is in harming emerging Canadian digital security companies, and putting a “liability chill” on research in this area.
Tories Have Yet to Prove Case for E-Snooping Bill
The Globe’s John Ibbitson on why the government has not made the case for lawful access. Ibbitson reports that the lawful access legislation will be bundled into a single bill to be introduced later this month or early next year. Public Safety Minister Vic Toews issues a non-responsive response, as […]
The Daily Digital Lock Dissenter, Day 44: New Brunswick Public Library Service
The circumvention of a digital lock for non-infringing purposes should be permitted.
An exception should also be made to anti-circumvention clauses to ensure that access to government information, laws, and court cases are never inaccessible to Canadians. As citizens, we should have an inalienable right to access this information.
Swiss Government Says Copyright Enforcement Rules Sufficient
Switzerland has completed a major government study on whether new measures are need to address online copyright infringement. The study concludes that no new legislative action is needed, citing the high costs and negative effects of three strikes and you’re out policies. It is noteworthy that Switzerland participated in the […]