Latest Posts

Domain Name Dispute Puts Dot-Ca in the Spotlight

My weekly Law Bytes column (freely available hyperlinked version, Toronto Star version, homepage version) focuses on the recent Canadian parliamentary discussion on domain name disputes. As discussed about ten days ago, the impetus for governmental interest in domain name disputes and Internet governance is the registration of several domain names bearing the names of sitting Members of Parliament by the Defend Marriage Coalition, an opponent of same-sex marriage legislation.

Read more ›

June 13, 2005 Comments are Disabled Columns

Groundhog Day

Readers of the Toronto Star will know that the paper recently published a letter to the editor from CRIA President Graham Henderson responding to my column on the privacy implications of the Federal Court of Appeal file sharing case. Henderson didn't think much of the column, opening his letter by stating that "Michael Geist's on-going vendetta against the record industry assumes new dimensions each week."

The Star edited some of the rest of the letter, but CRIA has now posted it in full on its site. The first paragraph actually continues in the same vein, with Henderson stating that "I think readers are entitled to start asking what motive is at the root of this single minded, attack dog mentality."

Since the start of the year, I've written 23 columns for the Star. They've addressed a wide range of issues including a national online library, patents, Internet pharmacies, broadband access, Internet telephony, spam, lawful access, ISP accountability, and censorship in China. Two columns have focused on intellectual property issues in developing countries and three have discussed privacy law issues. In fact, only seven columns considered copyright matters and just three columns explicitly focus on the music industry and copyright.

My motivations are pretty transparent. I am concerned about the impact of potential copyright reforms advocated by CRIA that have been shown elsewhere to have a negative impact on privacy, free speech, creativity, security, and research. I am concerned with policies that do little to benefit Canadian creators while sending increasing royalties to large multinational corporations based outside the country. I am concerned by public rhetoric that seeks to label as "theft" activities that may be permissible under Canadian law. I am concerned that Canadian copyright laws are not focused on policies that could genuinely foster greater Canadian creativity and access to Canadian culture.

I would argue that CRIA's motivations are also pretty transparent. Consider the development of the private copying levy in Canada and the ongoing debate on file sharing.

Read more ›

June 13, 2005 1 comment News

Cancon Week

This is shaping up to be a big week for Canadian content issues. On Thursday the CRTC will issue its satellite radio decision which is likely to feature discussion on how Canadian content requirements can or will be ported from traditional radio to satellite radio. Meanwhile, the Canadian Press is […]

Read more ›

June 13, 2005 Comments are Disabled News

Wishful Thinking

The Globe and Mail's Jack Kapica has posted in an interesting story on a recent appearance on Canada AM by CRIA President Graham Henderson. Discussing the upcoming copyright bill, Henderson told viewers that "That there is no question that there is language in this proposed bill that is going to […]

Read more ›

June 10, 2005 Comments are Disabled News

CRIA’s New Take on Copyright Reform

"This is terrific news. Canada is one step closer to having a copyright law that will reflect the realities of the digital marketplace and allow the music industry a chance to prosper. We want to thank the government and the opposition parties for their support in getting to this stage." […]

Read more ›

June 8, 2005 Comments are Disabled News