Post Tagged with: "prentice"

The Copyright MPs

Industry Minister Jim Prentice has understandably been the focal point of the Canadian DMCA given that it is his bill and his call as to whether the government will proceed with anti-education, anti-consumer, and anti-business copyright legislation. While every MP should be paying close attention to copyright – anecdotal evidence suggests that the majority of MPs from all parties have heard from constituents about the issue – there is a subset that should be particularly concerned.

The Copyright MPs are a group of 27 MPs (nine percent of all MPs) who share two key attributes – they won their riding by 10 percent or less in the last election and their riding is home to a university. The combination is important since it is these MPs – not the very safe Jim Prentice – who will face the consequences of the Prentice bill that will harm a generation well versed in digital technologies, social networks, and the Internet. In some ridings, less than 1,000 votes – roughly the size of some large first year courses – is needed to swing the entire riding. In all, there are 10 Conservatives, 11 Liberals, 4 NDP, and 2 Bloc. Who are the Copyright MPs?

The ten Conservative Copyright MPs who will be on the hotseat are:

MP	Riding	University	Winning Percentage	Runner Up Party
Rahim Jaffer (C)	Edmonton-Strathcona	U of Alberta	9.2 percent	NDP
Dean Del Mastro (C)	Peterborough	Trent	3.6 percent	Liberal
James Lunney (C)	Nanaimo-Alberni	Malaspina	9.1 percent	NDP
Rod Bruinooge (C)	Winnipeg South	U of Manitoba	0.2 percent	Liberal
David Sweet (C)	Ancaster-Dundas-Flamborough	McMaster	4.6 percent	Liberal
Norman Doyle (C)	St. John's East	Memorial	10.5 percent	Liberal
Peter MacKay (C)	Central Nova	St. FX	7.8 percent	NDP
Colin Carrie (C)	Oshawa	UOIT	5.2 percent	NDP
Betty Hinton (C)	Kamloops-Thompson-Cariboo	Thompson Rivers	8.5 percent	NDP
Joe Comuzzi (L)	Thunder Bay-Superior North	Lakehead	1.0 percent	NDP

January 23, 2008 — Comments are Disabled — Stop CDMCA

Canadian Copyright Lobby Seeking Mandated ISP Filtering

CRIA's Graham Henderson was in Ottawa today together with several other music groups to make their case for immediate copyright reform. Perhaps responding to the recent masthead editorials in the Vancouver Sun and National Post, the group met with the Ottawa Citizen's editorial board which has posted an MP3 version of the conversation. While there are some shots at me (counterfactual information?) and the obligatory distribution of Barry Sookman's attack on me and the Facebook group, there are two story lines that are worth noting (in addition to the ironic use of the CMCC's Feist as the Canadian artist example and the weak response to the Privacy Commissioner of Canada's concerns).

The first is that there is a great deal of common ground between what Henderson, CIRPA's Duncan McKie and the other attendees want and the Fair Copyright for Canada principles. Henderson and McKie both indicate that they have no intention of launching file sharing lawsuits, which should make the changes to the statutory damages provisions relatively non-contentious (though not a big win for users either). More importantly, several people in the room say they want WIPO, not the DMCA. That can be consistent with the Fair Copyright for Canada principles – linking anti-circumvention legislation to copyright infringement, avoiding a ban on devices that can be used to circumvent, and distribution as part of the making available right are all consistent with WIPO implementation.

While that is the good news, the second big story – which can easily be missed if you aren't paying attention – should send a chill down the spine of millions of Canadians.

January 22, 2008 — 61 comments — News

Canadian Copyright Lobby Seeking Mandated ISP Filtering

While that is the good news, the second big story – which can easily be missed if you aren't paying attention – should send a chill down the spine of millions of Canadians.

January 22, 2008 — Comments are Disabled — Stop CDMCA

The CCC on Copyright Reform

The Creators' Copyright Coalition is out this morning with its position on copyright reform. The CCC includes many large creator associations and copyright collectives. Though there are some notable exceptions – the Canadian Music Creators Coalition, Appropriation Art, and the Documentary Organization of Canada to name three – there are some important voices here.

While the government's focus on copyright reform has centred on new technologies, the CCC's position paper seems to focus primarily on non-digital issues. Indeed, the CCC is clearly troubled by the growing concern from users (it talks of "the tendency to privilege users") and of the Supreme Court of Canada's emphasis on balancing copyright (it laments that users are "now officially part of an on-going process of striking a 'necessary balance'"). The position paper sets out to scale back user concerns by dropping the SCC's balance objective to one where the "Copyright Act's main objective is to protect the moral and economic rights of creators." Moreover, it seeks to limit the fair dealing provision, by specifically excluding any commercial purposes from within its ambit.

In addition to shifting away from a copyright balance, the CCC looks at copyright reform primarily as the opportunity to introduce new rights and fees. In particular:

January 21, 2008 — 15 comments — News

The CCC on Copyright Reform

In addition to shifting away from a copyright balance, the CCC looks at copyright reform primarily as the opportunity to introduce new rights and fees. In particular:

January 21, 2008 — Comments are Disabled — Stop CDMCA