copyright-trap-action-3 by EFF https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2015/08/tpps-copyright-term-extension-isnt-made-artists-its-made-and-big-content-companies (CC BY 3.0 US)

copyright-trap-action-3 by EFF https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2015/08/tpps-copyright-term-extension-isnt-made-artists-its-made-and-big-content-companies (CC BY 3.0 US)

Episode 40: “Copyright Term Extension is a Tax on Consumers” – Paul Heald on What Extending Copyright Term Could Mean for Canada

Law Bytes
Law Bytes
Episode 40: “Copyright Term Extension is a Tax on Consumers” - Paul Heald on What Extending Copyright Term Could Mean for Canada
/

Copyright term extension has emerged as a major policy issue in Canada in recent months. Canada’s general copyright term is life of the author plus 50 years and successive governments have rejected lobbying pressure to extend by an additional 20 years. That changed with the new NAFTA, which includes a life plus 70 years requirement. Canada negotiated a 30 month transition period with no need to extend the copyright term during that time. The Canadian copyright review recommended that any extension include a registration requirement for the extra 20 years.

Paul Heald is a law professor at the University of Illinois, where he has led the world in conducting extensive empirical analysis on the effects of copyright term extension and the value of the public domain. His work has used some creative methods examining data on sites such as Amazon and Wikipedia to learn more about the effects of term extension. He joined me on the podcast to discuss his findings and new work he has been doing on the data in Canada.

The podcast can be downloaded here and is embedded below. Subscribe to the podcast via Apple Podcast, Google Play, Spotify or the RSS feed. Updates on the podcast on Twitter at @Lawbytespod.

Show Notes:

How Copyright Keeps Works Disappeared
The Valuation of Unprotected Works: A Case Study of Public Domain Photographs on Wikipedia

Credits:

House of Commons, January 31, 2020

3 Comments

  1. While onne tiip may function on a particular day or week, another tip
    may work better another. Again, she is a person who reads,
    writes, leaves comments and can be helpful to others. http://us9.co/frankoceankingkrule953200

  2. FirebirdSUV says:

    It is good that scientists from universities are taking part in the discussion of this problem. After all, important research is being carried out in their laboratories and most of the patents belong to them. On the one hand, patents help to avoid plagiarism and a decrease in product quality, but on the other hand, large corporations abuse this and lobby for their probation in order to get additional profit. When I wrote my plagiarism free essay based on https://paperell.net/plagiarism-free-essay-writing, I wanted the main idea in my published material to be that a patent should not be valid for more than 50 years. Yes, initially protecting patents helps us do new research, but the abuse of patents makes life more difficult for many people.

  3. Pauline George says:

    Navigating the complexities of copyright law, much like my academic challenges, has been a journey. In the realm of studies, I found solace and support in tools like StoryboardThat, a service that turned obstacles into opportunities. It’s more than just a platform; it’s my secret weapon to tackle intricate subjects. When facing difficulties, I go to website StoryboardThat and create visual aids like alphabetical order worksheets. The process of crafting these resources not only reinforces my understanding but also transforms hurdles into stepping stones. StoryboardThat is my go-to website for turning study challenges into victories.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

*

*