Text: Small Text  Normal Text  Large Text  Larger Text

    Canadian DMCA: C-61

    Why Copyright? Canadian Voices on Copyright Law

    Canadian DMCA: 61 Reforms to C-61

    Canadian DMCA: What You Need to Know

    Posts On Hot Issues

    Blog Archive

    PrevPrevAugust 2010NextNext
    SMTWTFS
    1234567
    891011121314
    15161718192021
    22232425262728
    293031

    The Bloc on C-32: Only Consumers Suffer Frustration From Digital Locks

    PDF  | Print |  E-mail
    Thursday June 17, 2010
    After a post on the Bloc's position on three strikes, I was contacted by Bloc Heritage critic MP Carole Lavallée, who wanted to clarify her position on the government's copyright bill.  She provided a detailed response that argues that three strikes is worth considering and expressess doubt about the value of placing digital locks at the foundation of the new copyright bill. Lavallée notes that digital locks do little for creators and create considerable harm and frustration for consumers.  She adds that WIPO is an obsolete approach, advocating instead for the introduction of a levy system.

    It should be noted that this suggests that all three opposition parties have now expressed concern with C-32's digital lock provisions. The NDP have been outspoken in their opposition and Liberal critic Marc Garneau has indicated that the bill is missing an exception to allow consumers to break locks for private, non-commercial purposes.  With the Bloc now stating that locks are not a solution, the minority Conservatives will need to find a compromise in order to pass the bill.

    Her full response - posted with permission - is below:


    Tags:
    , , ,
    Share: Slashdot, Digg, Del.icio.us, Newsfeeder, Reddit, StumbleUpon, TwitterTagsShare
    View
     

    Moore's Strong Rejection of Three Strikes Model for Canada

    PDF  | Print |  E-mail
    Friday June 04, 2010

    It did not attract much media attention other than a few tweets, but perhaps the most noteworthy aspect of the Ministerial news conference on Wednesday launching Bill C-32 was the comments from Canadian Heritage Minister James Moore on the possibility on bringing a three-strikes and you're out (or "graduated response") system to Canada.  While some have encouraged the government to move in that direction in recent months, Moore slammed the door shut on that possibility.  According to Moore:

    One of the proposals that was suggested was the idea that Canada would have a three strikes rule, which is what they have in France.  We don’t agree with that. I don’t think a three strikes rule is in the best interests of consumers. Which is what, consumers would receive three notices or three allegations of impropriety and then their internet would be cut off.  It would be devastating for individual Canadians, bad for consumers, because now, access to the internet is part of our everyday lives, not just for movies and for songs, but for doing banking, for taking care of your mortgage, for communicating with your kids, for communicating with family across the country. This is an essential part of our economy, so we disagreed with the idea of a three strikes rule.

    This is good news, particularly given comments this week from Bloc MP Carole Lavallée, who seemingly thinks three strikes is too generous.  She urged the government to adopt a two strikes and you're out policy.

    Update: I received an email from Ms. Lavallée this afternoon indicating that the Canoe story did not fully capture her views.  She says that three strikes is an option that should be discussed, but that she did not put it forward as a firm solution.


    Tags:
    , , , ,
    Share: Slashdot, Digg, Del.icio.us, Newsfeeder, Reddit, StumbleUpon, TwitterTagsShare
     

    Liberals, Bloc, and NDP All Support Motion To Extend Private Copying Levy

    PDF  | Print |  E-mail
    Tuesday March 16, 2010
    MPs from the Liberals, Bloc, and NDP today all supported a motion at the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage to extend the private copying levy to devices such as iPods.  The motion, proposed by Bloc MP Carole Lavallée, provided:

    That the Committee recommends that the government amend Part VIII of the Copyright Act so that the definition of “audio recording medium” extends to devices with internal memory, so that the levy on copying music will apply to digital music recorders as well, thereby entitling music creators to some compensation for the copies made of their work.

    Interestingly, the committee was split - 5 in support ( Charlie Angus, Carole Lavallée, Roger Pomerleau, Scott Simms, Justin Trudeau) and 5 against (Rod Bruinooge, Dean Del Mastro, Royal Galipeau, Nina Grewal, Tim Uppal).  That left it to Conservative Chair Gary Schellenberger who voted in favour of the motion.  That is seemingly at odds with comments today from Canadian Heritage Minister James Moore and Industry Minister Tony Clement who were strongly opposed to measure.
    Tags:
    , ,
    Share: Slashdot, Digg, Del.icio.us, Newsfeeder, Reddit, StumbleUpon, TwitterTagsShare
     

    Duceppe Points To Copyright As Area of Disagreement

    PDF  | Print |  E-mail
    Tuesday September 02, 2008
    Howard Knopf notes that disagreement over the copyright bill [MP3 version of CBC World At Six] was one of the issues specifically raised Bloc leader Gilles Duceppe's meeting last week with Prime Minister Stephen Harper, increasing the likelihood that copyright could emerge as an issue during the forthcoming election campaign.
    Tags:
    , , , , , ,
    Share: Slashdot, Digg, Del.icio.us, Newsfeeder, Reddit, StumbleUpon, TwitterTagsShare
     
    << Start < Prev 1 2 Next > End >>

    Results 1 - 4 of 6