Text: Small Text  Normal Text  Large Text  Larger Text

    Canadian DMCA: C-61

    Why Copyright? Canadian Voices on Copyright Law

    Canadian DMCA: 61 Reforms to C-61

    Canadian DMCA: What You Need to Know

    Posts On Hot Issues

    Blog Archive

    PrevPrevAugust 2010NextNext
    SMTWTFS
    1234567
    891011121314
    15161718192021
    22232425262728
    293031

    CBC on the Throttled Fundraiser For Sick Kids

    PDF  | Print |  E-mail
    Friday July 10, 2009

    CBC reports on Brad Fox's appearance before the CRTC this week, when he described how Bell throttled an online fundraiser in November 2008 when it was mistaken for P2P traffic.

    Update: Brad Fox provides further details on the couchathon and the traffic shaping.


    Tags:
    , , ,
    Share: Slashdot, Digg, Del.icio.us, Newsfeeder, Reddit, StumbleUpon, TwitterTagsShare
     

    Did the CRTC Misunderstand the CAIP Throttling Case Against Bell?

    PDF  | Print |  E-mail
    Wednesday July 08, 2009
    Today's CRTC network management hearing featured some stunning discussion on the throttling of wholesale services that undoubtedly left many observers wondering whether the Commission actually understood what it was doing in the CAIP throttling complaint against Bell (CAIP has asked the Commission to reconsider the decision).  The discussion started when MTS Allstream adopted the position that dominant carriers should not be permitted to throttle or traffic shape at the wholesale level.  In other words, any traffic management practices should be limited to the ISP that interacts directly with a customer at the retail level.  MTS argued that the wholesale service (known as GAS or Gateway Access Service) is more like a private virtual network, where the ISP is purchasing capacity.  The GAS is not strictly an Internet service and MTS assured the Commission that the use of the wholesale services should not have a congestion impact on the carrier's retail Internet services.

    This is relevant since the CAIP complaint involved GAS.  CAIP was concerned that Bell's throttling was being done not to relieve congestion, but rather for competitive reasons.  It believed that Bell was concerned that independent ISPs would offer retail customers non-throttled services (which ISPs like TekSavvy did), which might lead some to consumers to leave Bell (which they began to do).  Of course, this is an illustration of why competition would address many net neutrality concerns (assuming consumers can choose an alternate provider).  Yet Bell's approach was to throttle everyone's service at the retail and wholesale level, so that this form of competition would be eliminated.  And the CRTC, perhaps not even understanding the specifics of the services at issue, let them get away with it.

    Tags:
    , , , , , ,
    Share: Slashdot, Digg, Del.icio.us, Newsfeeder, Reddit, StumbleUpon, TwitterTagsShare
     

    CFTPA on Bell's Throttling Practices

    PDF  | Print |  E-mail
    Thursday June 25, 2009
    P2PNet points to a submission from the Canadian Film and Television Production Association that argues that Bell's throttling practices unduly disadvantage P2P content, P2P apps, and end-users accessing legal P2P content.
    Tags:
    , , ,
    Share: Slashdot, Digg, Del.icio.us, Newsfeeder, Reddit, StumbleUpon, TwitterTagsShare
     

    Is Throttling Necessary?

    PDF  | Print |  E-mail
    Wednesday January 07, 2009
    CBC's Search Engine has a great podcast that tries to answer the question that will dominate the CRTC's net neutrality hearing - is throttlng actually necessary?
    Tags:
    , ,
    Share: Slashdot, Digg, Del.icio.us, Newsfeeder, Reddit, StumbleUpon, TwitterTagsShare
     
    << Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next > End >>

    Results 1 - 4 of 29