The Supreme Court of Canada continues to distinguish itself as the leading high court in the world for recognizing the need for balance in intellectual property law matters. The latest example is this morning’s pair of trademark decisions involving Mattel’s Barbie trademark and champagne maker Veuve Cliquot. In both cases, the trademark holder, arguing the fame of its brand, sought to stop small businesses from using the names in unrelated commercial activities (a Barbie restaurant and Cliquot line of clothing stores). The court ruled against the "famous" trademark holder in both cases, affirming the limits of trademark law that prevent rights holders from claiming a total monopoly for all good and services in their name given that there was limited likelihood of consumer confusion. The judgments, both written by Justice Binnie, again demonstrate that the court values both the importance of IP protection and the need for limits to such protection.
Supreme Court Rules Against Overbroad Trademark Rights
June 2, 2006
Share this post

Law Bytes
Episode 241: Scott Benzie on How Government Policy Eroded Big Tech Support for Canadian Culture
byMichael Geist

July 21, 2025
Michael Geist
June 30, 2025
Michael Geist
June 23, 2025
Michael Geist
Search Results placeholder
Recent Posts
The Sound of Silence: On Being Jewish in Canada in 2025
The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 241: Scott Benzie on How Government Policy Has Eroded Big Tech Support for Canadian Culture
What Is the Canadian Government Doing With Its Incoherent Approach to TikTok?
The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 240: Dean Beeby on Why Canada’s Language Laws May Stop Government From Posting Access to Information Records Online
Risky Business: The Legal and Privacy Concerns of Mandatory Age Verification Technologies