The Supreme Court of Canada continues to distinguish itself as the leading high court in the world for recognizing the need for balance in intellectual property law matters. The latest example is this morning’s pair of trademark decisions involving Mattel’s Barbie trademark and champagne maker Veuve Cliquot. In both cases, the trademark holder, arguing the fame of its brand, sought to stop small businesses from using the names in unrelated commercial activities (a Barbie restaurant and Cliquot line of clothing stores). The court ruled against the "famous" trademark holder in both cases, affirming the limits of trademark law that prevent rights holders from claiming a total monopoly for all good and services in their name given that there was limited likelihood of consumer confusion. The judgments, both written by Justice Binnie, again demonstrate that the court values both the importance of IP protection and the need for limits to such protection.
Supreme Court Rules Against Overbroad Trademark Rights
June 2, 2006
Share this post

Law Bytes
Episode 232: What Will Canadian Digital Policy Look Like Under the New Liberal Carney Government?
byMichael Geist

May 5, 2025
Michael Geist
March 31, 2025
Michael Geist
March 24, 2025
Michael Geist
March 10, 2025
Michael Geist
Search Results placeholder
Recent Posts
When the Drumbeat of Intolerance Becomes Too Loud to Ignore: Reflections on Campus Antisemitism, Academic Freedom and My Global Technology Law Exchange Course
Solomon’s Choice: Charting the Future of AI Policy in Canada
The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 232: What Will Canadian Digital Policy Look Like Under the New Liberal Carney Government?
The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 231: Sara Bannerman on How Canadian Political Parties Maximize Voter Data Collection and Minimize Privacy Safeguards
The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 230: Aengus Bridgman on the 2025 Federal Election, Social Media Platforms, and Misinformation