The CBC reports that Union des consommateurs, a non-profit group based in Montreal, is preparing a submission that must be filed with Canada's telecommunications regulator by Monday as part of the group's request for strict rules concerning "premium" text messages.
Consumer Groups Seek Tighter Rules on ‘Premium’ SMS Charges
March 9, 2009
Share this post
3 Comments

Law Bytes
Episode 257: Lisa Given on What Canada Can Learn From Australia’s Youth Social Media Ban
byMichael Geist

February 9, 2026
Michael Geist
Episode 256: Jennifer Quaid on Taking On Big Tech With the Competition Act's Private Right of Access
February 2, 2026
Michael Geist
The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 255: Grappling with Grok – Heidi Tworek on the Limits of Canadian Law
January 26, 2026
Michael Geist
December 22, 2025
Michael Geist
December 8, 2025
Michael Geist
Search Results placeholder
Recent Posts
The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 257: Lisa Given on What Canada Can Learn From Australia’s Youth Social Media Ban
Court Ordered Social Media Site Blocking Coming to Canada?: Trojan Horse Online Harms Bill Clears Senate Committee Review
An Illusion of Consensus: What the Government Isn’t Saying About the Results of its AI Consultation
The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 256: Jennifer Quaid on Taking On Big Tech With the Competition Act’s Private Right of Access
Government Says There Are No Plans for National Digital ID To Access Services

Good
I agree with the Consumers Union.
If people are being told to pay or lose their service then that’s not following procedure now is it?
Bell, videotron, rogers, et al. get their money (and collection fee) and they seem to think you have no recourse.
This is another case where there customer/consumers must file with the CCTS and wait a month for a decision. Then if (and ONLY if) the decision is in their favor, the cell providers give your money back about 3-months later.
I don’t know about Rogers or videotron, but Bell is a 3 month wait for a credit.
And if the CCTS doesn’t come back with a favorable response because you didn’t explain yourself well enough, too bad for you.
I don’t see anything on these teclo’s websites showing how you can contest the SMS charges either. Nothing. Nothing at all.
The Consumers Union webpage shows how though, and its a run-around! Its made to discourage you.
1. Complain to the telco
2. Send a check in seperately for the extra charges “under protest”
3. Write the CWTA (the body who controls the Short codes)
4. write the CCTS
5. wait for replies from everyone.
wait, rinse, repeat. And meanwhile you paid and continue to pay.
As stated, even if you’re canceled, these SMS’s can continue to come in for a few days or a week later (and you pay) till it ends.
The you have to go through the same run-around again listed above.
Its made to discourage you.
If there is a billing dispute why should it take 5 steps and a letter writing campaign.
I’m all for this.
Everyone should read the full record
The full record is available on the CRTC’s website, with the Union application and the response from the industry. http://www.crtc.gc.ca/PartVII/eng/2009/8620/u11_200901951.htm
Good
TY for the link!
I read it all.
I find the telecom response a bit disturbing and I see some holes, problems and issues.
Does anyone else? Am I alone?