The CBC reports that Union des consommateurs, a non-profit group based in Montreal, is preparing a submission that must be filed with Canada's telecommunications regulator by Monday as part of the group's request for strict rules concerning "premium" text messages.
Consumer Groups Seek Tighter Rules on ‘Premium’ SMS Charges
March 9, 2009
Share this post
3 Comments

Law Bytes
Episode 235: Teresa Scassa on the Alberta Clearview AI Ruling That Could Have a Big Impact on Privacy and Generative AI
byMichael Geist

May 5, 2025
Michael Geist
Search Results placeholder
Recent Posts
Quebec’s Streaming Regulation Bill 109: Unconstitutional, Unnecessary, and Unworkable
Why the Government’s Plan for Warrantless Access to Internet Subscriber Information Will Lead to Millions of Disclosure Demands Each Year
The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 235: Teresa Scassa on the Alberta Clearview AI Ruling That Could Have a Big Impact on Privacy and Generative AI
What Is With This Government and Privacy?: Political Party Privacy Safeguards Removed in “Affordability Measures” Bill
More Than Just Phone Book Data: Why the Government is Dangerously Misleading on its Warrantless Demands for Internet Subscriber Information
Good
I agree with the Consumers Union.
If people are being told to pay or lose their service then that’s not following procedure now is it?
Bell, videotron, rogers, et al. get their money (and collection fee) and they seem to think you have no recourse.
This is another case where there customer/consumers must file with the CCTS and wait a month for a decision. Then if (and ONLY if) the decision is in their favor, the cell providers give your money back about 3-months later.
I don’t know about Rogers or videotron, but Bell is a 3 month wait for a credit.
And if the CCTS doesn’t come back with a favorable response because you didn’t explain yourself well enough, too bad for you.
I don’t see anything on these teclo’s websites showing how you can contest the SMS charges either. Nothing. Nothing at all.
The Consumers Union webpage shows how though, and its a run-around! Its made to discourage you.
1. Complain to the telco
2. Send a check in seperately for the extra charges “under protest”
3. Write the CWTA (the body who controls the Short codes)
4. write the CCTS
5. wait for replies from everyone.
wait, rinse, repeat. And meanwhile you paid and continue to pay.
As stated, even if you’re canceled, these SMS’s can continue to come in for a few days or a week later (and you pay) till it ends.
The you have to go through the same run-around again listed above.
Its made to discourage you.
If there is a billing dispute why should it take 5 steps and a letter writing campaign.
I’m all for this.
Everyone should read the full record
The full record is available on the CRTC’s website, with the Union application and the response from the industry. http://www.crtc.gc.ca/PartVII/eng/2009/8620/u11_200901951.htm
Good
TY for the link!
I read it all.
I find the telecom response a bit disturbing and I see some holes, problems and issues.
Does anyone else? Am I alone?