The CBC reports that Union des consommateurs, a non-profit group based in Montreal, is preparing a submission that must be filed with Canada's telecommunications regulator by Monday as part of the group's request for strict rules concerning "premium" text messages.
Consumer Groups Seek Tighter Rules on ‘Premium’ SMS Charges
March 9, 2009
Share this post
3 Comments

Law Bytes
Episode 280: A Fall Update on Where Things Stand on Canadian Digital Policy Reforms
byMichael Geist

October 26, 2026
Michael Geist
October 19, 2026
Michael Geist
August 10, 2026
Michael Geist
Search Results placeholder
Michael Geist on Substack
Recent Posts
Ofcom Did the Work Canada Plans to Skip: What the UK’s Age Verification Report Reveals About the Bill C-34 Social Media Ban
The Age Verification Bill That Won’t Die: How Bill S-209 Complicates the Government’s Bill C-34 Online Safety Plan
The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 280: A Fall Update on Where Things Stand on Canadian Digital Policy Reforms
The Wrong Ban: The Heritage Committee Backed a Targeted Ad Ban for Kids and Stopped Short of a Social Media Ban, Yet the Government Chose the Reverse
Regulator First, Rules Later: Bill C-34 Debate Shows the Government Wants a Digital Safety Commission Before It Figures Out What It Will Do

Good
I agree with the Consumers Union.
If people are being told to pay or lose their service then that’s not following procedure now is it?
Bell, videotron, rogers, et al. get their money (and collection fee) and they seem to think you have no recourse.
This is another case where there customer/consumers must file with the CCTS and wait a month for a decision. Then if (and ONLY if) the decision is in their favor, the cell providers give your money back about 3-months later.
I don’t know about Rogers or videotron, but Bell is a 3 month wait for a credit.
And if the CCTS doesn’t come back with a favorable response because you didn’t explain yourself well enough, too bad for you.
I don’t see anything on these teclo’s websites showing how you can contest the SMS charges either. Nothing. Nothing at all.
The Consumers Union webpage shows how though, and its a run-around! Its made to discourage you.
1. Complain to the telco
2. Send a check in seperately for the extra charges “under protest”
3. Write the CWTA (the body who controls the Short codes)
4. write the CCTS
5. wait for replies from everyone.
wait, rinse, repeat. And meanwhile you paid and continue to pay.
As stated, even if you’re canceled, these SMS’s can continue to come in for a few days or a week later (and you pay) till it ends.
The you have to go through the same run-around again listed above.
Its made to discourage you.
If there is a billing dispute why should it take 5 steps and a letter writing campaign.
I’m all for this.
Everyone should read the full record
The full record is available on the CRTC’s website, with the Union application and the response from the industry. http://www.crtc.gc.ca/PartVII/eng/2009/8620/u11_200901951.htm
Good
TY for the link!
I read it all.
I find the telecom response a bit disturbing and I see some holes, problems and issues.
Does anyone else? Am I alone?