Facing an advertising lawsuit of its own, Rogers has filed suit against Bell over its wireless advertising claims. Rogers notes that Bell has virtually no customers on its new network and cannot substantiate reliability claims.
Rogers Sues Bell Over Ad Claims
2 Comments
Recent Posts
The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 265: Jason Millar on Claude Mythos, Project Glasswing, and the Governance Crisis in Frontier AI 
A Standard That Doesn’t Exist: Parliamentary Secretary for Justice Offers Misleading Defence of Bill C-22’s Lower Threshold for Subscriber Information 
More Surveillance Demands to Come?: Government Admits Bill C-22’s Lawful Access Provisions Could Be Expanded 
Win, Lose or Draw?: The Federal Court of Appeal Overrules a Key Copyright Case on Procedural Grounds 
The Lawful Access Debate Begins: Canadians Should Pay Attention to What the Government Isn’t Saying
Well…
That may be the case but it wouldn’t be hard to be more reliable than Rogers.
If Rogers is the “most reliable” in Canada then we have pretty terrible infrastructure. I have missed call notifications all the time yet the phone doesn’t ring, I get booted from the 3G all the time when doing data. I get almost 0 service in Saskatchewan below the #1. If I’m at a cafe pull of iphone users I can’t do much data.
The pot calling the other pot black…
Personally, I’m sick of both of these companies. I’m sick about the way they’re allowed to completely lie about everything in their advertisements.
And, I’m sick about the way they’re allowed to keep piling on new customers, based on these false claims, and using the increasing volume of customers as an excuse as to why they can’t deliver anything they say, and why they need to interfere with the services they’re still charging full price for!