The Public Domain blog takes issue with a recent off-hand comment from Bloc MP Thierry St-Cyr, who suggested that there is no copyright in comments made during Question Period debate. The reality is the opposite – the government asserts crown copyright in the House of Commons official record, Hansard.
Bloc MP St-Cyr and Crown Copyright
						April 1, 2010
						
		Share this post
2 Comments

Law Bytes
Episode 246: Mohamed Zohiri on the Rise and Emerging Regulation of Stablecoins
byMichael Geist

October 20, 2025
							Michael Geist
					October 6, 2025
							Michael Geist
					September 22, 2025
							Michael Geist
					September 15, 2025
							Michael Geist
					July 28, 2025
							Michael Geist
					Search Results placeholder
Recent Posts
 The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 246: Mohamed Zohiri on the Rise and Emerging Regulation of Stablecoins The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 246: Mohamed Zohiri on the Rise and Emerging Regulation of Stablecoins
 Senate Bill Would Grant Government Regulatory Power to Mandate Age Verification For Search, Social Media and AI Services Accompanied By Threat of Court Ordered Blocking of Lawful Content Senate Bill Would Grant Government Regulatory Power to Mandate Age Verification For Search, Social Media and AI Services Accompanied By Threat of Court Ordered Blocking of Lawful Content
 Government Reverses on Bill C-2: Removes Lawful Access Warrantless Demand Powers in New Border Bill Government Reverses on Bill C-2: Removes Lawful Access Warrantless Demand Powers in New Border Bill
 Why The Recent TikTok Privacy Ruling Swaps Privacy for Increased Surveillance Why The Recent TikTok Privacy Ruling Swaps Privacy for Increased Surveillance
 The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 245: Kate Robertson on Bill C-2’s Cross-Border Data Sharing Privacy Risks The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 245: Kate Robertson on Bill C-2’s Cross-Border Data Sharing Privacy Risks

Actual crown copyright, yes, but
looking at the excerpt from Hansard in the article it appears to me that there is little to no impact to the average citizen… It appears that the crown claims effective copyright (in as much as they restrict what can be done with it) only for “for-profit” uses or for reproductions which claim to be official. What does this mean? It means that you can’t print copies, or sell online, copies of Hansard. There may be a couple others, but…
but what?
Why should there be copyright in such crown works at all?
Many other countries make do without similar provisions. In fact, liberalizing the use, even commercial use, of government produced works, unleashes private-sector activity; witness the multiple third-party publications of the Warren Commission and 9/11 reports in the US.
And, on the flipside, over restrictive government copyright impedes cultural activity and industry; just try clearing rights to crown documents in the UK or Canada.