Federal Court Open Door to Business Method Patents
October 15, 2010
Tags: amazon / business methods / patents
Share this post
Episode 167: Inside My Senate Committee Appearance on the Many Risks of Bill C-18
May 15, 2023
May 1, 2023
Episode 164: Teresa Scassa on the Latest Canadian Court Ruling on Facebook and What It Might Mean for Privacy Reform
April 24, 2023
Episode 163: Cohere AI CEO Aidan Gomez on the Emerging Legal and Regulatory Challenges for Artificial Intelligence
April 17, 2023
Search Results placeholder
- The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 168: Privacy Commissioner of Canada Philippe Dufresne on How to Fix Bill C-27
- CRTC Chair Vicky Eatrides Faces Her First Big Test: Is the Commission Serious About Public Participation on Bill C-11?
- Ready, Fire, Aim: Eleven Thoughts on the CRTC’s Bill C-11 Consultations
- The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 167: Inside My Senate Committee Appearance on the Many Risks of Bill C-18
- The Government’s Epic Bill C-18 Miscalculation on Mandating Payments for Links
Law, Privacy and Surveillance in Canada in the Post-Snowden Era (University of Ottawa Press, 2015)
The Copyright Pentalogy: How the Supreme Court of Canada Shook the Foundations of Canadian Copyright Law (University of Ottawa Press, 2013)
From “Radical Extremism” to “Balanced Copyright”: Canadian Copyright and the Digital Agenda (Irwin Law, 2010)
In the Public Interest: The Future of Canadian Copyright Law (Irwin Law, 2005) .
Apparently, they feel they work so damn great down South…
Yep, it’s all Microsoft vs. Apple vs. Oracle vs. Google down there.
Not in making better products, of course, but to see who can acquire the most software patents to sue and extort each other with.
Mind you, all that the FCC said was that the Commissioner erred in her rejection of the patent due to a policy that business processes are not patentable; they did not grant the patent, they ruled only on the fact that there is not class exemption for business processes. The ordered re-examination means that the patent may still be rejected due to “obviousness”.
This leaves the door open to the patenting of things like new marketing methods or “quality” methodologies. Each patent application would then still have to go through other tests to see if it was patentable.
Patents are used as hunting licences south of the border. Software companies are moving operations out of the US to try to avoid the madness. The government should be ready with legislation to step in and stop this before it leaves us completely screwed.
Sarcasticly … Serious
“Anything under the sun” is not patentable, but surely “anything under the sun, made by man is”. It is funny how on one hand we claim that we are not doing so well in the e-commerce and e-business sector and on the other hand we make it easier to patent software. No wonder developing countries are expected to enforce stronger patent regimes, following this logic I really believe it is for their own good…