5 Comments

1. Ben Harack says:

   May 10, 2011 at 10:09 am

   Read the piece, didn’t see lawful access mentioned
   I just read through the piece you linked. The only thing as far as I know that might be lawful access is: “Giving law enforcement up-to-date tools to fight crime in today’s high-tech communications environment;” Which is general enough that it doesn’t say much.
2. Joe says:

   May 10, 2011 at 12:57 pm

   @Ben Harack
   That’s the sentence they use instead of lawful access or anything that might elaborate on the bill.
3. Anonymous says:

   May 10, 2011 at 1:27 pm

   Somebody ask the professor!
   What is this you’ve dug up here? Is this “warrantless DPI”? Backdoor to https?

   When you get a chance, Mr. Chairman.
4. Crockett says:

   May 10, 2011 at 2:51 pm

   Braveheart …
   Anonymous — Hi, John.
5. mandelbr0t says:

   May 17, 2011 at 9:29 pm

   Internet Censorship
   This story is being buried by mainstream media. Thanks for making this public. The proposed legislation is a scary slippery slope to Canadians losing all civil rights. The US is forcing us to adopt a police state so that they can fight their wars. I wish that Canadian politicians were intelligent enough to see that this is both a dangerous and ineffective idea.